Eating Behaviors in Australian Military Personnel: Constructing a System of Interest for a Social Marketing Intervention

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS Social Marketing Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-08-25 DOI:10.1177/1524500420948487
R. Anibaldi, J. Carins, S. Rundle‐Thiele
{"title":"Eating Behaviors in Australian Military Personnel: Constructing a System of Interest for a Social Marketing Intervention","authors":"R. Anibaldi, J. Carins, S. Rundle‐Thiele","doi":"10.1177/1524500420948487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Eating behaviors are complex and have particular significance for military personnel who require sound nutrition to support health and physical fitness for job performance. Policies and guidelines for the provision of nutritionally appropriate food/drink on base and in the field do exist; however, many military personnel have poor dietary habits, and these habits are evident early in their career. Social marketing could assist in changing unhealthy eating behaviors of personnel through implementation of feasible interventions co-created with stakeholders that are valued by Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel. Focus of the article: The article reports the first phase of a systemic co-inquiry into unhealthy eating behaviors of military personnel. This study aimed to gain an initial framing of the problem situation and thus hypothesize a “system of interest” in which to conduct future work. Research questions What components (e.g., ideas, objects, attributes, activities) are perceived to be relevant for eating behaviors in military personnel? Do interrelationships and interconnections among components suggest how unhealthy eating behaviors may emerge? Are there places that suggest viable leverage points as opportunities for changing unhealthy eating behaviors through delivery of offerings that ADF personnel value? Program Design/Approach: This study was part of a systemic inquiry approach. Methods: Data for the study included document analysis and 14 semi-structured depth interviews with ADF stakeholders. Data were thematically analyzed to construct a system of interest in which to explore how eating behaviors emerge among personnel and ADF-controlled leverage points that can be used to increase healthy eating for ADF personnel through social marketing intervention. Results: The data analysis identified alternative systems of interest in which to explore how eating behaviors emerge among personnel. Demand and supply side leverage points were identified. On the supply side, the encouragement of patronage through menu innovation, investment in facilities, cooking skills training, and auditing provision were opportunities for social marketing intervention. On the demand side, education and training coupled with communications that challenge cultural and regulatory norms and link to military values were areas that programs seeking to increase healthy eating in ADF personnel could focus on. Importance to the Social Marketing Field: As an approach for addressing “wicked” problems, the application of systems thinking in social marketing has privileged an ontological concept of system as a metaphor for reality. This approach assists in expanding the focus of change beyond the individual to include factors in social, economic, and policy environments. By using systems thinking as an epistemological device, this article offers an approach that may be applied to overcome practical and philosophical limitations in the application of systems thinking. Recommendations for Research or Practice: Research on alternative methods for applying systems thinking is recommended to strengthen the potential of system approaches in the field of social marketing. Limitations: This study is part of a broader program, and its findings on the problem of unhealthy eating behaviors in ADF are preliminary. Limitations specific to the study include the possibility of “reductionism” in stakeholder identification and self-selection bias in participation.","PeriodicalId":46085,"journal":{"name":"Social Marketing Quarterly","volume":"26 1","pages":"229 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1524500420948487","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Marketing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500420948487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Eating behaviors are complex and have particular significance for military personnel who require sound nutrition to support health and physical fitness for job performance. Policies and guidelines for the provision of nutritionally appropriate food/drink on base and in the field do exist; however, many military personnel have poor dietary habits, and these habits are evident early in their career. Social marketing could assist in changing unhealthy eating behaviors of personnel through implementation of feasible interventions co-created with stakeholders that are valued by Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel. Focus of the article: The article reports the first phase of a systemic co-inquiry into unhealthy eating behaviors of military personnel. This study aimed to gain an initial framing of the problem situation and thus hypothesize a “system of interest” in which to conduct future work. Research questions What components (e.g., ideas, objects, attributes, activities) are perceived to be relevant for eating behaviors in military personnel? Do interrelationships and interconnections among components suggest how unhealthy eating behaviors may emerge? Are there places that suggest viable leverage points as opportunities for changing unhealthy eating behaviors through delivery of offerings that ADF personnel value? Program Design/Approach: This study was part of a systemic inquiry approach. Methods: Data for the study included document analysis and 14 semi-structured depth interviews with ADF stakeholders. Data were thematically analyzed to construct a system of interest in which to explore how eating behaviors emerge among personnel and ADF-controlled leverage points that can be used to increase healthy eating for ADF personnel through social marketing intervention. Results: The data analysis identified alternative systems of interest in which to explore how eating behaviors emerge among personnel. Demand and supply side leverage points were identified. On the supply side, the encouragement of patronage through menu innovation, investment in facilities, cooking skills training, and auditing provision were opportunities for social marketing intervention. On the demand side, education and training coupled with communications that challenge cultural and regulatory norms and link to military values were areas that programs seeking to increase healthy eating in ADF personnel could focus on. Importance to the Social Marketing Field: As an approach for addressing “wicked” problems, the application of systems thinking in social marketing has privileged an ontological concept of system as a metaphor for reality. This approach assists in expanding the focus of change beyond the individual to include factors in social, economic, and policy environments. By using systems thinking as an epistemological device, this article offers an approach that may be applied to overcome practical and philosophical limitations in the application of systems thinking. Recommendations for Research or Practice: Research on alternative methods for applying systems thinking is recommended to strengthen the potential of system approaches in the field of social marketing. Limitations: This study is part of a broader program, and its findings on the problem of unhealthy eating behaviors in ADF are preliminary. Limitations specific to the study include the possibility of “reductionism” in stakeholder identification and self-selection bias in participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚军人饮食行为:构建社会营销干预的利益体系
背景:饮食行为是复杂的,对于需要良好营养来支持健康和身体素质的军人来说,饮食行为具有特殊的意义。在基地和外地提供营养适当的食物/饮料的政策和准则确实存在;然而,许多军人的饮食习惯很差,这些习惯在他们的职业生涯早期就很明显。社会营销可以通过实施澳大利亚国防军人员重视的与利益攸关方共同制定的可行干预措施,帮助改变人员的不健康饮食行为。文章重点:文章报道了对军事人员不健康饮食行为的系统共同调查的第一阶段。本研究的目的是获得问题情况的初步框架,从而假设一个“利益系统”,以进行未来的工作。哪些组成部分(例如,想法,物体,属性,活动)被认为与军事人员的饮食行为有关?成分之间的相互关系和相互联系是否表明不健康饮食行为是如何产生的?通过提供ADF人员重视的产品,是否存在建议可行的杠杆点作为改变不健康饮食行为的机会?项目设计/方法:本研究是系统调查方法的一部分。方法:研究数据包括文献分析和对ADF利益相关者的14次半结构化深度访谈。对数据进行主题分析,构建一个感兴趣的系统,探讨人员的饮食行为如何产生以及ADF控制的杠杆点,这些杠杆点可用于通过社会营销干预增加ADF人员的健康饮食。结果:数据分析确定了其他感兴趣的系统,以探索如何在人员中出现饮食行为。确定了需求侧和供给侧的杠杆点。在供应方面,通过菜单创新、设施投资、烹饪技能培训和审计提供来鼓励光顾是社会营销干预的机会。在需求方面,教育和培训与挑战文化和监管规范的沟通以及与军事价值观的联系是寻求增加ADF人员健康饮食的方案可以关注的领域。对社会营销领域的重要性:作为解决“邪恶”问题的一种方法,系统思维在社会营销中的应用赋予了系统作为现实隐喻的本体论概念的特权。这种方法有助于将变化的焦点从个人扩展到包括社会、经济和政策环境中的因素。通过将系统思维作为一种认识论手段,本文提供了一种可能用于克服系统思维应用中的实践和哲学限制的方法。研究或实践建议:建议对应用系统思维的替代方法进行研究,以加强系统方法在社会营销领域的潜力。局限性:这项研究是一个更广泛的项目的一部分,它对ADF中不健康饮食行为问题的发现是初步的。本研究特有的局限性包括利益相关者识别中的“还原论”可能性和参与中的自我选择偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Prospect of Social Marketing in Enhancing the Acquisition and Utilization of Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs) for the Prevention of Malaria in a Rural Area of Imo State, South-Eastern Nigeria Examining the Effect of Message Strategies on Peruvian Mothers´ Intentions to Increase Fruit Intake Among Children The good death: The interplay between group dynamics, end of life decision making, and creative consumption Flushing out homeowner perceptions to improve voluntary septic to sewer conversion with social marketing Comparison of COVID-19 Behaviour Change Campaign Ads in Tanzania: Results From a Randomised Controlled Survey-Based Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1