{"title":"desconstrução da metafísica em Vozes Plurais, de Adriana Cavarero","authors":"Iamni Reche Bezerra","doi":"10.5007/2175-7917.2021.E72079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On this paper, I aim at describing and commenting the configurations of unicity's vocalic ontology as defended by Adriana Cavarero on the work Vozes Plurais: filosofia da expressao vocal (2011). As we will see, the concern Cavarero directs to the voice comes from her critique on the metaphysical effort to unvocalize the logos, privileging the not sounding voice over the voice produced by a throat made of flesh. Therefore, the philosopher defends the necessity of a thought based on the singularity of the voice, which entails attention to a sounding and corporeal voice, one that is, above all, essentially relational. Next, I intend to present the antagonist elements of Cavarero's deconstruction and the one proposed by philosopher Jacques Derrida. As we will see, the matter seems to be properly located on what both her and Derrida, distinctively, indicate as the holding element of antimetaphysical validity.","PeriodicalId":30964,"journal":{"name":"Anuario de Literatura","volume":"26 1","pages":"01-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario de Literatura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7917.2021.E72079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
On this paper, I aim at describing and commenting the configurations of unicity's vocalic ontology as defended by Adriana Cavarero on the work Vozes Plurais: filosofia da expressao vocal (2011). As we will see, the concern Cavarero directs to the voice comes from her critique on the metaphysical effort to unvocalize the logos, privileging the not sounding voice over the voice produced by a throat made of flesh. Therefore, the philosopher defends the necessity of a thought based on the singularity of the voice, which entails attention to a sounding and corporeal voice, one that is, above all, essentially relational. Next, I intend to present the antagonist elements of Cavarero's deconstruction and the one proposed by philosopher Jacques Derrida. As we will see, the matter seems to be properly located on what both her and Derrida, distinctively, indicate as the holding element of antimetaphysical validity.