Study of the adhesion of microhybrid and nanohybrid diacrylic composite resins to dental hard tissues

Q4 Dentistry Revista Romana de Stomatologie Pub Date : 2019-09-30 DOI:10.37897/rjs.2019.3.7
B. Gălbinașu, Vlad-Cristian Grigore, A. Ghita, I. Pătrașcu
{"title":"Study of the adhesion of microhybrid and nanohybrid diacrylic composite resins to dental hard tissues","authors":"B. Gălbinașu, Vlad-Cristian Grigore, A. Ghita, I. Pătrașcu","doi":"10.37897/rjs.2019.3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. The aim of the present study is to compare the adhesive capacity of the microhybrid and nanohybrid diacrylic composite resins to enamel, dentin and cement. Materials and method. Standardized cavities were made at the cervical level on the vestibular surfaces of 8 maxillary third molars without caries or fractures. The cavities were filled with microhybrid (Filtek Z250 – 3M ESPE), respectively nanohybrid composites (Filtek Z550 – 3M ESPE), half of the teeth also receiving an intermediate layer of flowable composite (Gradia Direct LoFlo – GC). All of them were subjected to a thermocycling process (300 cycles in water of 5°C/55°C). After the isolation of the teeth with nail polish, they were introduced into 1% methylene blue for 24 hours. Subsequently, they were embedded in an epoxy resin (EpoThinTM 2 – Buehler), polished and sectioned mesio-distally with Beta Grinder/Polisher-Buehler. Sections were selected where the greatest degree of methylene blue penetration was detected to be analyzed by optical polarized light microscopy (Axio Imager A1m – Zeiss). Results. All teeth showed microinfiltration of the cement, while only half showed it also in enamel. There are no microinfiltration differences between microand nanohybrid composite resins. The intermediate layer of flowable composite does not influence microinfiltration.","PeriodicalId":33514,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjs.2019.3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. The aim of the present study is to compare the adhesive capacity of the microhybrid and nanohybrid diacrylic composite resins to enamel, dentin and cement. Materials and method. Standardized cavities were made at the cervical level on the vestibular surfaces of 8 maxillary third molars without caries or fractures. The cavities were filled with microhybrid (Filtek Z250 – 3M ESPE), respectively nanohybrid composites (Filtek Z550 – 3M ESPE), half of the teeth also receiving an intermediate layer of flowable composite (Gradia Direct LoFlo – GC). All of them were subjected to a thermocycling process (300 cycles in water of 5°C/55°C). After the isolation of the teeth with nail polish, they were introduced into 1% methylene blue for 24 hours. Subsequently, they were embedded in an epoxy resin (EpoThinTM 2 – Buehler), polished and sectioned mesio-distally with Beta Grinder/Polisher-Buehler. Sections were selected where the greatest degree of methylene blue penetration was detected to be analyzed by optical polarized light microscopy (Axio Imager A1m – Zeiss). Results. All teeth showed microinfiltration of the cement, while only half showed it also in enamel. There are no microinfiltration differences between microand nanohybrid composite resins. The intermediate layer of flowable composite does not influence microinfiltration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微杂化和纳米杂化二丙烯酸复合树脂与牙硬组织的黏附研究
客观的本研究的目的是比较微杂化和纳米杂化二丙烯酸酯复合树脂对牙釉质、牙本质和水泥的粘附能力。材料和方法。在没有龋齿或骨折的8颗上颌第三磨牙的前庭表面上,在颈部水平上制作了标准化的龋齿。空腔填充有微杂化材料(Filtek Z250–3M ESPE)和纳米杂化复合材料(Filtec Z550–3M ESP),一半的牙齿还接受可流动复合材料的中间层(Gradia Direct LoFlo–GC)。所有这些都经过了热循环过程(在5°C/55°C的水中进行300次循环)。在用指甲油分离牙齿后,将它们引入1%亚甲蓝中24小时。随后,将它们嵌入环氧树脂(EpoThinTM 2–Buehler)中,用Beta Grinder/Polisher-Buehler进行抛光和近端切片。选择检测到亚甲基蓝渗透程度最大的切片,通过光学偏振光显微镜(Axio Imager A1m–Zeiss)进行分析。后果所有牙齿都显示出水泥的微过滤,而只有一半的牙齿在牙釉质中也显示出这种情况。微米和纳米杂化复合树脂之间没有微过滤差异。可流动复合材料的中间层不影响微过滤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
SEM and EDS comparative studies about the homogeneity of some cements used for luting of posts Ultrastructural studies on implants failure with immediate or late loading The causes of adhesive direct dental restorations failures A systematic review of sinus floor augmentation complications. Does graft type influence the complications rate? The RT-PCR additional value in detecting periodontal pathogens in periodontitis patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1