ORGANIZATIONAL LISTENING DURING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE: PERSPECTIVES OF EMPLOYEES AND EXECUTIVES

Q1 Arts and Humanities International Journal of Listening Pub Date : 2021-06-23 DOI:10.1080/10904018.2021.1941029
Surabhi Sahay
{"title":"ORGANIZATIONAL LISTENING DURING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE: PERSPECTIVES OF EMPLOYEES AND EXECUTIVES","authors":"Surabhi Sahay","doi":"10.1080/10904018.2021.1941029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT During organizational change, organizations increase their listening initiatives to monitor resistance, lower uncertainty, and enhance commitment to change. Scholars have argued that many of these initiatives are superficial in nature and may be compared to inauthentic listening, the key concept explored in this article. In general, while organizational listening has been known to improve employee trust and engagement, organizations struggle to incorporate effective listening due to lack of systems, processes, structures, resources, and skill sets. This study sought to explore the perspectives of both senior-level executives and employees who had provided input during change [i.e., input providers]. Thirty-seven participants from large, publicly held companies were interviewed for the study. The study found that inauthentic listening resulted from change-related restrictions, problematic conduct of solicitation, and limited analysis and presentation of input. Inauthentic listening had negative consequences for the organizations and the input providers. Organizations can enhance listening competencies by selecting culturally sensitive technologies, developing comprehensive analysis mechanisms, adopting a holistic listening approach, and developing empathetic skills for those soliciting input.","PeriodicalId":35114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Listening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10904018.2021.1941029","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Listening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2021.1941029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT During organizational change, organizations increase their listening initiatives to monitor resistance, lower uncertainty, and enhance commitment to change. Scholars have argued that many of these initiatives are superficial in nature and may be compared to inauthentic listening, the key concept explored in this article. In general, while organizational listening has been known to improve employee trust and engagement, organizations struggle to incorporate effective listening due to lack of systems, processes, structures, resources, and skill sets. This study sought to explore the perspectives of both senior-level executives and employees who had provided input during change [i.e., input providers]. Thirty-seven participants from large, publicly held companies were interviewed for the study. The study found that inauthentic listening resulted from change-related restrictions, problematic conduct of solicitation, and limited analysis and presentation of input. Inauthentic listening had negative consequences for the organizations and the input providers. Organizations can enhance listening competencies by selecting culturally sensitive technologies, developing comprehensive analysis mechanisms, adopting a holistic listening approach, and developing empathetic skills for those soliciting input.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织变革中的组织倾听:员工和高管的观点
在组织变革过程中,组织通过提高倾听主动性来监测阻力,降低不确定性,增强变革承诺。学者们认为,许多这样的举措本质上是肤浅的,可以比作不真实的倾听,这是本文探讨的关键概念。一般来说,虽然组织倾听可以提高员工的信任和敬业度,但由于缺乏系统、流程、结构、资源和技能,组织很难整合有效的倾听。本研究试图探索在变革过程中提供输入的高级管理人员和员工[即输入提供者]的观点。这项研究采访了37名来自大型上市公司的参与者。研究发现,不真实的倾听是由与变化相关的限制、有问题的征求行为以及有限的分析和表达输入造成的。不真实的倾听对组织和输入提供者都有负面影响。组织可以通过选择具有文化敏感性的技术、开发综合分析机制、采用整体倾听方法以及开发征求意见者的同理心技能来提高倾听能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Listening
International Journal of Listening Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN INNATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRAITS AND THE ATTITUDES` ASSESSMENT TOWARD ACTIVE LISTENING AMONG EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS LISTENING TO BOOKS’ DURING THE PANDEMIC: EXAMINING THE USES AND GRATIFICATIONS OF AUDIOBOOK LISTENING RHETORICAL LISTENING AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EXPLORING THE BLACK PETE DEBATE IN FLANDERS RHETORICAL LISTENING AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EXPLORING THE BLACK PETE DEBATE IN FLANDERS INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF RESPONSE FORMAT IN COMPUTER-BASED LECTURE COMPREHENSION TASKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1