The Roads We Take: Cellular Targets and Pathways Leading Biologics Across the Blood–Brain Barrier

Habib Baghirov
{"title":"The Roads We Take: Cellular Targets and Pathways Leading Biologics Across the Blood–Brain Barrier","authors":"Habib Baghirov","doi":"10.3389/fddev.2022.946045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biologics are at the frontier of CNS disease treatment. This applies both to therapeutic molecules such as peptides, antibodies and RNA interference agents, and to delivery vehicles of biological origin such as viral vectors and extracellular vesicles. Unlike small molecules, biologics are not likely to diffuse across cell membranes. To get into and across brain capillary endothelial cells (BCEC) forming the blood–brain barrier, they normally employ active, energy-dependent processes. They can initiate these processes non-specifically or trigger them by interaction with various receptor or transporter molecules at the luminal surface of BCEC. Designing biologics to use this specific engagement is more common in smaller formats, especially peptides and antibodies, but can also apply to targeted vehicles. This targeted design has employed a number of molecules expressed on BCEC – the transferrin receptor being the most common example, although there has been progress in identifying molecules that are even more specific to BCEC. In addition, the format of biologics and a multitude of their biophysical properties affect the way they interact with BCEC, and this diversity is even more salient between different classes of biologics. It affects the entire span of interaction with BCEC, from the initial engagement at the luminal surface to intracellular sorting, and eventually, entrapment or routing toward exocytosis into the brain parenchyma. In this article, I reviewed the progress in identifying novel targets that make the interactions between biologics and BCEC more specific, and in our understanding of the interplay between the properties of biologics and these interactions.","PeriodicalId":73079,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in drug delivery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fddev.2022.946045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biologics are at the frontier of CNS disease treatment. This applies both to therapeutic molecules such as peptides, antibodies and RNA interference agents, and to delivery vehicles of biological origin such as viral vectors and extracellular vesicles. Unlike small molecules, biologics are not likely to diffuse across cell membranes. To get into and across brain capillary endothelial cells (BCEC) forming the blood–brain barrier, they normally employ active, energy-dependent processes. They can initiate these processes non-specifically or trigger them by interaction with various receptor or transporter molecules at the luminal surface of BCEC. Designing biologics to use this specific engagement is more common in smaller formats, especially peptides and antibodies, but can also apply to targeted vehicles. This targeted design has employed a number of molecules expressed on BCEC – the transferrin receptor being the most common example, although there has been progress in identifying molecules that are even more specific to BCEC. In addition, the format of biologics and a multitude of their biophysical properties affect the way they interact with BCEC, and this diversity is even more salient between different classes of biologics. It affects the entire span of interaction with BCEC, from the initial engagement at the luminal surface to intracellular sorting, and eventually, entrapment or routing toward exocytosis into the brain parenchyma. In this article, I reviewed the progress in identifying novel targets that make the interactions between biologics and BCEC more specific, and in our understanding of the interplay between the properties of biologics and these interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们所走的道路:细胞目标和途径引导生物制剂通过血脑屏障
生物制剂是中枢神经系统疾病治疗的前沿。这既适用于治疗性分子,如多肽、抗体和RNA干扰剂,也适用于生物来源的递送载体,如病毒载体和细胞外囊泡。与小分子不同,生物制剂不太可能跨越细胞膜扩散。为了进入和穿过形成血脑屏障的脑毛细血管内皮细胞(BCEC),它们通常采用主动的、能量依赖的过程。它们可以非特异性地启动这些过程,也可以通过与BCEC管腔表面的各种受体或转运分子相互作用来触发这些过程。设计利用这种特殊作用的生物制剂在较小的形式中更常见,尤其是肽和抗体,但也可以应用于靶向载体。这种靶向设计采用了许多在BCEC上表达的分子——转铁蛋白受体是最常见的例子,尽管在识别BCEC特异性更大的分子方面取得了进展。此外,生物制剂的形式及其众多生物物理特性影响它们与BCEC相互作用的方式,这种多样性在不同类别的生物制剂之间更为突出。它影响了与BCEC相互作用的整个过程,从最初的管腔表面接触到细胞内分选,最终被困住或向胞外分泌方向进入脑实质。在这篇文章中,我回顾了识别新的靶点,使生物制剂和BCEC之间的相互作用更具体的进展,以及我们对生物制剂的性质和这些相互作用之间的相互作用的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategies and delivery systems for cell-based therapy in autoimmunity Preliminary results on novel adjuvant combinations suggest enhanced immunogenicity of whole inactivated pandemic influenza vaccines Induction of P-glycoprotein overexpression in brain endothelial cells as a model to study blood-brain barrier efflux transport SpheroMold: modernizing the hanging drop method for spheroid culture 3D-printed weight holders design and testing in mouse models of spinal cord injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1