Tense-aspect conditioned agent marking in Kanakanavu, an Austronesian language of Taiwan

IF 0.6 Q3 LINGUISTICS Open Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1515/opli-2022-0234
Yi-Yang Cheng
{"title":"Tense-aspect conditioned agent marking in Kanakanavu, an Austronesian language of Taiwan","authors":"Yi-Yang Cheng","doi":"10.1515/opli-2022-0234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines two types of lexical effects in the voice system of Kanakanavu, an Austronesian language of Taiwan. The first concerns a well-attested phenomenon in the Austronesian literature: interactions between the semantic transitivity of verbs and their ability (or lack thereof) to undergo voice alternation. The second concerns a phenomenon that is typologically and areally rare in the western Austronesian context – differential agent marking. The pronominal agent in Kanakanavu’s patient-/undergoer-voice construction is differentially case-marked depending on the tense-aspect value of the clause. However, lexical effects are found in how the differentially marked agent is interpreted. When dynamic verbs are used, omitted agents in perfective clauses are interpreted as coreferential with a specific referent mentioned in prior discourse, but those in non-perfective clauses are interpreted as having generic reference, backgrounded, and/or not centrally involved in the situation expressed by the verb. When stative verbs are used, alternation between perfective and imperfective verb forms may have various effects on the interpretation of the agent. In some stative verbs, the agent is interpreted as a prototypical semantic agent in the perfective, but as a semantic experiencer in the imperfective. In other stative verbs, the perfective/non-perfective alternation has to do with whether a change of state is involved, without having any effects on agent interpretation. This study explores how lexical effects manifest across both elicited and natural discourse data. It also presents the phenomenon of differential agent marking in Kanakanavu as neither typical nor representative in the western Austronesian context.","PeriodicalId":43803,"journal":{"name":"Open Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article examines two types of lexical effects in the voice system of Kanakanavu, an Austronesian language of Taiwan. The first concerns a well-attested phenomenon in the Austronesian literature: interactions between the semantic transitivity of verbs and their ability (or lack thereof) to undergo voice alternation. The second concerns a phenomenon that is typologically and areally rare in the western Austronesian context – differential agent marking. The pronominal agent in Kanakanavu’s patient-/undergoer-voice construction is differentially case-marked depending on the tense-aspect value of the clause. However, lexical effects are found in how the differentially marked agent is interpreted. When dynamic verbs are used, omitted agents in perfective clauses are interpreted as coreferential with a specific referent mentioned in prior discourse, but those in non-perfective clauses are interpreted as having generic reference, backgrounded, and/or not centrally involved in the situation expressed by the verb. When stative verbs are used, alternation between perfective and imperfective verb forms may have various effects on the interpretation of the agent. In some stative verbs, the agent is interpreted as a prototypical semantic agent in the perfective, but as a semantic experiencer in the imperfective. In other stative verbs, the perfective/non-perfective alternation has to do with whether a change of state is involved, without having any effects on agent interpretation. This study explores how lexical effects manifest across both elicited and natural discourse data. It also presents the phenomenon of differential agent marking in Kanakanavu as neither typical nor representative in the western Austronesian context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
台湾南岛语族卡纳卡纳武语的时向条件因子标记
摘要本文考察了台湾南岛语族卡纳卡纳武语语音系统中的两类词汇效应。第一个是南岛语文献中一个得到充分证实的现象:动词的语义及物性与它们经历语态变化的能力(或缺乏能力)之间的相互作用。第二种是关于一种在西南岛环境中非常罕见的类型学现象-差异代理标记。在Kanakanavu的病人-/受者-语态结构中,代词代理根据从句的时态-方面值进行不同的格标记。然而,词汇效应是发现如何解释差异标记的代理。当使用动态动词时,完成分句中省略的谓语被解释为与先前语篇中提到的特定指称物有关联,而非完成分句中省略的谓语则被解释为具有一般指称、背景和/或不集中涉及动词所表达的情况。当使用静态动词时,动词完成时和未完成时的交替会对施动者的解释产生不同的影响。在一些静态动词中,主体在完成时被解释为原型语义主体,而在未完成时被解释为语义体验者。在其他静态动词中,完成时/非完成时的交替与状态是否发生变化有关,对主体的解释没有任何影响。本研究探讨了词汇效应如何在引出语篇和自然语篇数据中表现出来。它还提出了卡纳卡纳瓦人的差异标记现象,在西南岛语境中既不典型也不具有代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Linguistics
Open Linguistics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Linguistics is a new academic peer-reviewed journal covering all areas of linguistics. The objective of this journal is to foster free exchange of ideas and provide an appropriate platform for presenting, discussing and disseminating new concepts, current trends, theoretical developments and research findings related to a broad spectrum of topics: descriptive linguistics, theoretical linguistics and applied linguistics from both diachronic and synchronic perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Tense-aspect conditioned agent marking in Kanakanavu, an Austronesian language of Taiwan Excursive questions Spheres of interest: Space and social cognition in Phola deixis Ideophones in Arusa Maasai: Syntax, morphology, and phonetics Deviant language in the literary dialogue: An English–Romanian translational view
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1