A Nationwide Survey on Malaysian Hospital Physicians’ Practices of Intravenous Potassium Chloride Supplementation and Opinions on Premixed Formulation in the Treatment of Hypokalaemia

C. Chong, Melissa Mohammad Hirman
{"title":"A Nationwide Survey on Malaysian Hospital Physicians’ Practices of Intravenous Potassium Chloride Supplementation and Opinions on Premixed Formulation in the Treatment of Hypokalaemia","authors":"C. Chong, Melissa Mohammad Hirman","doi":"10.21315/mjps2023.21.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate the Malaysian hospital physicians’ practices of intravenous potassium chloride in the treatment of hypokalaemia and their opinions on using premixed formulation. This was a nationwide online survey using a self-administered questionnaire. The survey link was sent to the practising hospital physicians in Malaysia through email (n = 1,455), Facebook Messenger (n = 2,734) and posted on Facebook as well. A total of 207 responses were received. The physicians were mostly males (63.8%), aged between 30 years old–39 years old (51.2%) and worked in the government sectors (76.8%). The most preferred dosage of potassium chloride for mild, moderate and severe hypokalaemia was 10 mmol (44.4%), 20 mmol (55.1%) and 30 mmol (37.7%), respectively. The mostly chosen infusion rate of potassium chloride for mild hypokalaemia was over 24 h (41.1%) while for both moderate and severe hypokalaemia were over 1 h–2 h (63.8% and 89.9%, respectively). The concentration of intravenous potassium chloride is the main factor (68.1%) which would influence the infusion route choice. Serum potassium monitoring of every 24 h was chosen by 52.7% of the respondents for mild hypokalaemia while every 1 h–2 h was mostly chosen for moderate and severe hypokalaemia (49.3% and 87.4%, respectively). Cardiac monitoring was mostly opted in severe hypokalaemic patients (70.0%). Majority of physicians agreed that a premixed formulation is easier to administer (64.7%) and safer for the patients (51.7%). In conclusion, there were variations in the prescribing practices among Malaysian physicians to treat hypokalaemia. Most physicians were in favour of premixed formulation.","PeriodicalId":53358,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjps2023.21.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the Malaysian hospital physicians’ practices of intravenous potassium chloride in the treatment of hypokalaemia and their opinions on using premixed formulation. This was a nationwide online survey using a self-administered questionnaire. The survey link was sent to the practising hospital physicians in Malaysia through email (n = 1,455), Facebook Messenger (n = 2,734) and posted on Facebook as well. A total of 207 responses were received. The physicians were mostly males (63.8%), aged between 30 years old–39 years old (51.2%) and worked in the government sectors (76.8%). The most preferred dosage of potassium chloride for mild, moderate and severe hypokalaemia was 10 mmol (44.4%), 20 mmol (55.1%) and 30 mmol (37.7%), respectively. The mostly chosen infusion rate of potassium chloride for mild hypokalaemia was over 24 h (41.1%) while for both moderate and severe hypokalaemia were over 1 h–2 h (63.8% and 89.9%, respectively). The concentration of intravenous potassium chloride is the main factor (68.1%) which would influence the infusion route choice. Serum potassium monitoring of every 24 h was chosen by 52.7% of the respondents for mild hypokalaemia while every 1 h–2 h was mostly chosen for moderate and severe hypokalaemia (49.3% and 87.4%, respectively). Cardiac monitoring was mostly opted in severe hypokalaemic patients (70.0%). Majority of physicians agreed that a premixed formulation is easier to administer (64.7%) and safer for the patients (51.7%). In conclusion, there were variations in the prescribing practices among Malaysian physicians to treat hypokalaemia. Most physicians were in favour of premixed formulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚医院医生静脉补充氯化钾做法的全国调查及对预混制剂治疗低钾血症的意见
本研究旨在评估马来西亚医院医生静脉注射氯化钾治疗低钾血症的做法,以及他们对使用预混制剂的意见。这是一项全国性的在线调查,使用的是一份自我管理的问卷。调查链接通过电子邮件(n = 1,455)和Facebook Messenger (n = 2,734)发送给马来西亚的执业医院医生,并在Facebook上发布。我们共收到207份回应。医生以男性居多(63.8%),年龄介乎30至39岁(51.2%),在政府部门工作(76.8%)。轻度、中度和重度低钾血症患者首选氯化钾剂量分别为10 mmol(44.4%)、20 mmol(55.1%)和30 mmol(37.7%)。轻度低钾血症患者首选氯化钾输注时间超过24 h(41.1%),中度和重度低钾血症患者均选择输注时间超过1 h - 2 h(63.8%和89.9%)。静脉氯化钾浓度是影响输注途径选择的主要因素(68.1%)。对于轻度低钾血症,52.7%的受访者选择每24 h监测一次血钾,而对于中度和重度低钾血症,大多选择每1 h - 2 h监测一次(分别为49.3%和87.4%)。重度低钾血症患者多采用心脏监护(70.0%)。大多数医生认为预混制剂更容易管理(64.7%),对患者更安全(51.7%)。总之,马来西亚医生在治疗低钾血症的处方实践中存在差异。大多数医生赞成预混配方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
DELIVERY OF TRAINING IN HIV/AIDS SERVICES AMONG COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS IN OYO STATE, NIGERIA: AN INTERVENTIONAL STUDY GLYCAEMIC CONTROL AND HYPOGLYCAEMIA AMONG PATIENTS WITH DIABETES IN A PHARMACIST-MANAGED INSULIN TITRATION PROGRAMME SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PHARMACIST-LED HOME MEDICATION REVIEWS TO IMPROVE ADHERENCE TO ANTIDIABETIC MEDICATIONS AMONG ADULT TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS AN OVERVIEW ON CUBOSOMES AS REMARKABLE NANOCARRIER FOR DRUG DELIVERY A Nationwide Survey on Malaysian Hospital Physicians’ Practices of Intravenous Potassium Chloride Supplementation and Opinions on Premixed Formulation in the Treatment of Hypokalaemia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1