The discovery of absorptive capacity and the practice of intellectual capital mobilization within change management processes

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Organizational Change Management Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1108/jocm-07-2022-0211
J. Rooney, Thilini Kaushalya, A. Jayawardana
{"title":"The discovery of absorptive capacity and the practice of intellectual capital mobilization within change management processes","authors":"J. Rooney, Thilini Kaushalya, A. Jayawardana","doi":"10.1108/jocm-07-2022-0211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposePrevious studies have argued that improvement in organizational performance though change management processes is grounded in external knowledge acquisition and assimilation. However, there is ambiguity in how existing knowledge, in the form of intellectual capital (IC), is mobilized in this context. In response, this paper develops a context-based mediator model depicting the relationship between IC processes, absorptive capacity (AC) and organizational performance following the introduction of external knowledge.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative longitudinal case study approach is adopted, collecting data over three phases of a quality improvement program over a three-year period.FindingsWith the development of relational capital facilitated thorough changes in the work environment and the structured enhancement of knowledge-processing capabilities, the study identified the mediating role of AC on the relationship between IC mobilization and improved organizational performance.Originality/valueWhilst there have been studies of relationships between IC and organization performance, to the best of the “authors” knowledge, this is one the few empirical studies to explore associations between IC types, existing knowledge sharing processes and IC mobilization, mediated by the AC of a firm, to exploit external knowledge.","PeriodicalId":47958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-07-2022-0211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposePrevious studies have argued that improvement in organizational performance though change management processes is grounded in external knowledge acquisition and assimilation. However, there is ambiguity in how existing knowledge, in the form of intellectual capital (IC), is mobilized in this context. In response, this paper develops a context-based mediator model depicting the relationship between IC processes, absorptive capacity (AC) and organizational performance following the introduction of external knowledge.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative longitudinal case study approach is adopted, collecting data over three phases of a quality improvement program over a three-year period.FindingsWith the development of relational capital facilitated thorough changes in the work environment and the structured enhancement of knowledge-processing capabilities, the study identified the mediating role of AC on the relationship between IC mobilization and improved organizational performance.Originality/valueWhilst there have been studies of relationships between IC and organization performance, to the best of the “authors” knowledge, this is one the few empirical studies to explore associations between IC types, existing knowledge sharing processes and IC mobilization, mediated by the AC of a firm, to exploit external knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在变革管理过程中发现吸收能力和智力资本动员的实践
目的先前的研究认为,通过变革管理过程来提高组织绩效是建立在外部知识获取和同化的基础上的。然而,在这种情况下,以知识资本(IC)形式存在的现有知识是如何被调动的,这一点存在歧义。作为回应,本文开发了一个基于上下文的中介模型,描述了引入外部知识后IC过程、吸收能力(AC)和组织绩效之间的关系。设计/方法/方法采用定性纵向案例研究方法,在三年内收集质量改进计划三个阶段的数据。研究发现,随着关系资本的发展促进了工作环境的彻底改变和知识处理能力的结构化增强,AC在IC动员和提高组织绩效之间的关系中发挥了中介作用。独创性/价值尽管已经对IC和组织绩效之间的关系进行了研究,但据“作者”所知,这是为数不多的实证研究之一,旨在探索IC类型、现有知识共享过程和IC动员之间的联系,由公司的AC介导,以利用外部知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: ■Adapting strategic planning to the need for change ■Leadership research ■Responsibility for change implementation and follow-through ■The psychology of change and its effect on the workforce ■TQM - will it work in your organization? Successful organizations respond intelligently to factors which precipitate change. Economic climates, political trends, changes in consumer demands, management policy or structure, employment levels and financial resources - all these elements are constantly at play to ensure that organizations clinging on to static structures will ultimately lose out. But change is a dynamic and alarming thing - this journal addresses how to manage it positively.
期刊最新文献
Developing and validating a scale for entrepreneurial marketing orientations: EMICO framework and its impact on business performance in startups School principals’ resistance to change: a multilevel analysis of individual factors and contextual conditions A systematic literature review on the network perspective and resource interaction: where are we now and where should we go? “I am served by a Robot!”: internal antecedents of customer acceptance of robotic hotel-service agents Unveiling organizational consciousness: a conceptual framework for nurturing thriving organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1