Influence of phosphorus fertiliser blends on grain yield, nutrient concentration, and profitability of soyabeans in the southern Guinea Savannah of Ghana

S. Adjei-Nsiah, J. K. Ahiakpa, K. Gyan, F. Kanampiu
{"title":"Influence of phosphorus fertiliser blends on grain yield, nutrient concentration, and profitability of soyabeans in the southern Guinea Savannah of Ghana","authors":"S. Adjei-Nsiah, J. K. Ahiakpa, K. Gyan, F. Kanampiu","doi":"10.1080/02571862.2021.1959660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted on-farm trials in the southern Guinea savannah of Ghana in 2016 and 2017 to evaluate soyabean response to three fertiliser blends to guide farmers towards profitable adoption of appropriate phosphorus fertiliser blend for improved soyabean production. Old Yara Legume, New Yara Legume and Triple Superphosphate fertiliser blends were evaluated. In both years, the phosphorus fertiliser blends were evaluated in a Randomised Complete Block Design with 20, 30, and 40 kg P ha−1 application rates together with control. Phosphorus fertiliser application increased soyabean yields by 1 070 kg ha−1. In 2016, fertiliser blend use efficiency ranged from 2.9 kg grain per kg fertiliser blend applied with the New Yara Legume applied at 40 kg P ha−1 to 7.4 kg grain per kg fertiliser blend applied with the Triple Superphosphate applied at 40 kg P ha−1 with significant differences between treatments. In 2017, blend use efficiency ranged from 2.5 kg grain per kg fertiliser blend applied with Old Yara Legume applied at 40 kg P ha−1 to 9.2 kg grain per kg fertiliser blend applied with the Triple Superphosphate applied at 40 kg P ha−1 with significant differences between treatments. However, phosphorus use efficiency did not significantly differ between the different treatments both in the 2016 and 2017 trials. In both 2016 and 2017 trials, the highest benefit cost ratio was attained at the lowest application rate for all the three fertiliser blends suggesting the need to review the current application rate of 30 kg P fertiliser ha−1 promoted in northern Ghana. Furthermore, the provision of credit and/or subsidy for farmers by the government is required to enable uptake and utilisation of fertilisers by farmers.","PeriodicalId":21920,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2021.1959660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We conducted on-farm trials in the southern Guinea savannah of Ghana in 2016 and 2017 to evaluate soyabean response to three fertiliser blends to guide farmers towards profitable adoption of appropriate phosphorus fertiliser blend for improved soyabean production. Old Yara Legume, New Yara Legume and Triple Superphosphate fertiliser blends were evaluated. In both years, the phosphorus fertiliser blends were evaluated in a Randomised Complete Block Design with 20, 30, and 40 kg P ha−1 application rates together with control. Phosphorus fertiliser application increased soyabean yields by 1 070 kg ha−1. In 2016, fertiliser blend use efficiency ranged from 2.9 kg grain per kg fertiliser blend applied with the New Yara Legume applied at 40 kg P ha−1 to 7.4 kg grain per kg fertiliser blend applied with the Triple Superphosphate applied at 40 kg P ha−1 with significant differences between treatments. In 2017, blend use efficiency ranged from 2.5 kg grain per kg fertiliser blend applied with Old Yara Legume applied at 40 kg P ha−1 to 9.2 kg grain per kg fertiliser blend applied with the Triple Superphosphate applied at 40 kg P ha−1 with significant differences between treatments. However, phosphorus use efficiency did not significantly differ between the different treatments both in the 2016 and 2017 trials. In both 2016 and 2017 trials, the highest benefit cost ratio was attained at the lowest application rate for all the three fertiliser blends suggesting the need to review the current application rate of 30 kg P fertiliser ha−1 promoted in northern Ghana. Furthermore, the provision of credit and/or subsidy for farmers by the government is required to enable uptake and utilisation of fertilisers by farmers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在加纳南部几内亚大草原,混合磷肥对粮食产量、养分浓度和大豆盈利能力的影响
我们于2016年和2017年在加纳南部几内亚大草原进行了农场试验,以评估大豆对三种肥料混合物的反应,以指导农民采用适当的磷肥混合物来提高大豆产量。对老亚拉豆科、新亚拉豆科和三元过磷酸钾混交肥进行了评价。在这两年中,采用随机完全区组设计,分别以20、30和40 kg P ha - 1施用量以及对照对磷肥混合物进行评估。施用磷肥可使大豆产量增加1 070公斤/公顷。2016年,混合肥料的利用效率为每公斤2.9公斤粒与施用40公斤磷- 1的新雅拉豆科作物混合肥料,每公斤7.4公斤粒与施用40公斤磷- 1的三元过磷酸钙混合肥料,处理之间存在显著差异。2017年,混合肥料的利用效率为每公斤2.5公斤粒与40公斤磷- 1的老雅拉豆科作物混合施用,每公斤9.2公斤粒与40公斤磷- 1的三磷酸混合施用,处理之间存在显著差异。然而,在2016年和2017年的试验中,不同处理之间的磷利用效率没有显著差异。在2016年和2017年的试验中,所有三种肥料混合物在最低施用量下获得了最高的效益成本比,这表明有必要审查目前在加纳北部推广的30公斤磷肥每公顷的施用量。此外,需要政府向农民提供信贷和/或补贴,以使农民能够吸收和利用肥料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Plant and Soil
South African Journal of Plant and Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal has a proud history of publishing quality papers in the fields of applied plant and soil sciences and has, since its inception, recorded a vast body of scientific information with particular reference to South Africa.
期刊最新文献
The impact of planting dates and hybrid selection on sunflower seed yield and oil content Comparison of the effectiveness of mined and by-product South African gypsums and other calcium sources for soil sodicity remediation Nutrient uptake and yield response of wheat ( Triticum spp.) to different fertiliser applications in Ethiopia Transpiration efficiency of lucerne under unlimited soil water conditions during the first growing season Digital soil mapping enables informed decision-making to conserve soils within protected areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1