Securitization of Climate and Environmental Protection in China’s New Normal

SSRN Pub Date : 2020-09-04 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3686466
A. Hernandez, Charmaine G. Misalucha-Willoughby
{"title":"Securitization of Climate and Environmental Protection in China’s New Normal","authors":"A. Hernandez, Charmaine G. Misalucha-Willoughby","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3686466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Around 2009, China’s economy has become the largest greenhouse-gas emitter. Climate protection policies have gradually entered the ‘high politics’ sphere in China particularly when climate and environmental protection have proved to be effective tools in achieving other political goals. When Xi Jinping came to power in 2012, China has entered into the “new normal” with a more comprehensive economic strategy that includes or even elevates a wide range of climate and environmental protection policies. China’s economic development is now shifting the balance of growth away from heavy-industrial investment and toward a more sustainable growth. Why – and how – did China change its tune? The key driver of change on the political importance of climate and environmental protection is China’s effort to recentralize governance. At the same time, while acknowledging that centralization is itself not the end but also a means to other political goals, this paper focuses on how the securitization of climate change and environmental protection has effectively served multiple purposes. It serves as a guiding principle on socioeconomic development and it serves as legitimacy to reestablish control by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) with Xi at the helm. With the linkage of climate and environmental protection to these political goals, China’s experience becomes distinct from the usual securitization process. Also, China shows that while most political processes do not formally include democratic deliberation or the direct approval of an audience, climate and environmental protection does encourage more latent forms of participation not only of citizens, but of experts. Therefore, the process of securitization is also feasible in non-democratic societies","PeriodicalId":74863,"journal":{"name":"SSRN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3686466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Around 2009, China’s economy has become the largest greenhouse-gas emitter. Climate protection policies have gradually entered the ‘high politics’ sphere in China particularly when climate and environmental protection have proved to be effective tools in achieving other political goals. When Xi Jinping came to power in 2012, China has entered into the “new normal” with a more comprehensive economic strategy that includes or even elevates a wide range of climate and environmental protection policies. China’s economic development is now shifting the balance of growth away from heavy-industrial investment and toward a more sustainable growth. Why – and how – did China change its tune? The key driver of change on the political importance of climate and environmental protection is China’s effort to recentralize governance. At the same time, while acknowledging that centralization is itself not the end but also a means to other political goals, this paper focuses on how the securitization of climate change and environmental protection has effectively served multiple purposes. It serves as a guiding principle on socioeconomic development and it serves as legitimacy to reestablish control by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) with Xi at the helm. With the linkage of climate and environmental protection to these political goals, China’s experience becomes distinct from the usual securitization process. Also, China shows that while most political processes do not formally include democratic deliberation or the direct approval of an audience, climate and environmental protection does encourage more latent forms of participation not only of citizens, but of experts. Therefore, the process of securitization is also feasible in non-democratic societies
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国新常态下的气候与环境保护证券化
2009年前后,中国经济已成为最大的温室气体排放国。在中国,气候保护政策已逐渐进入“高层政治”领域,尤其是在气候和环境保护已被证明是实现其他政治目标的有效工具的情况下。中国的经济发展正在改变增长的平衡,从重工业投资转向更可持续的增长。中国为什么——以及如何——改变了态度?气候和环境保护的政治重要性发生变化的关键驱动因素是中国重新集中治理的努力。与此同时,在承认中央集权本身不是目的,而是实现其他政治目标的手段的同时,本文关注的是气候变化和环境保护的证券化如何有效地服务于多种目的。随着气候和环境保护与这些政治目标的联系,中国的经验与通常的证券化过程有所不同。此外,中国表明,虽然大多数政治进程没有正式包括民主审议或听众的直接批准,但气候和环境保护确实鼓励更多潜在形式的参与,不仅是公民,还有专家。因此,证券化的过程在非民主社会中也是可行的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rvd2 Limits Senescent Cell Accumulation in Atherosclerotic Plaques Stocks as a Hedge against Inflation: Does Corporate Profitability Keep Up with Inflation? How Useful Is a Prospectus in Identifying Greenwashing versus True ESG Funds? Beyond Direct Indexing: Dynamic Direct Long-Short Investing The Hidden Cost in Costless Put-Spread Collars: Rebalance Timing Luck
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1