Evaluation of Institutional Development : Case on Private Forest Farmer Group in Sumbawa Regency

D. Diniyati
{"title":"Evaluation of Institutional Development : Case on Private Forest Farmer Group in Sumbawa Regency","authors":"D. Diniyati","doi":"10.15294/KOMUNITAS.V11I1.17580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although a large number of studies have been conducted to evaluate the success of farmer groups, a comprehensive evaluations starting from group formation process has not been carried out much.  This research rates the success of farmer groups as a vehicle to improve the livelihoods of farmers in the area of Management Unit of Production Forest (KPHP) of Puncak Ngengas-Batu Lanteh, Sumbawa. The success was measured by evaluating three roles of farmer groups namely,  a) class for learning, b) forum for collaboration, and c) unit for production. This research was conducted in two periods, i.e. on April 2016 and April 2017. The sample consisted of 20 forest farmers selected purposively, the data were collected through interviews and focus group discussion techniques and analysed descriptively. This study revealed that the roles scale of farmer groups as class for learning and as a forum for collaboration were categorized as low level, while as a unit for production was categorized as moderate level. These categories show that in general the farmer group had not succeeded in carrying out its function as a class for learning, and as a vehicle for collaboration, except as a unit for production. This weak condition was utilized by middlemen to take advantages from marketing activity by controlling forest product prices.  The Kanada farmer group was categorized in the beginner group which needs 75 % intervention from outsider such as continual mentoring by counsellors to grow the attitude from working alone to working together in a group. ","PeriodicalId":17912,"journal":{"name":"KOMUNITAS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KOMUNITAS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/KOMUNITAS.V11I1.17580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although a large number of studies have been conducted to evaluate the success of farmer groups, a comprehensive evaluations starting from group formation process has not been carried out much.  This research rates the success of farmer groups as a vehicle to improve the livelihoods of farmers in the area of Management Unit of Production Forest (KPHP) of Puncak Ngengas-Batu Lanteh, Sumbawa. The success was measured by evaluating three roles of farmer groups namely,  a) class for learning, b) forum for collaboration, and c) unit for production. This research was conducted in two periods, i.e. on April 2016 and April 2017. The sample consisted of 20 forest farmers selected purposively, the data were collected through interviews and focus group discussion techniques and analysed descriptively. This study revealed that the roles scale of farmer groups as class for learning and as a forum for collaboration were categorized as low level, while as a unit for production was categorized as moderate level. These categories show that in general the farmer group had not succeeded in carrying out its function as a class for learning, and as a vehicle for collaboration, except as a unit for production. This weak condition was utilized by middlemen to take advantages from marketing activity by controlling forest product prices.  The Kanada farmer group was categorized in the beginner group which needs 75 % intervention from outsider such as continual mentoring by counsellors to grow the attitude from working alone to working together in a group. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度发展评价:以松巴哇县私营林农团体为例
尽管已经进行了大量的研究来评估农民群体的成功,但从群体形成过程开始的综合评估并没有进行太多。这项研究评价了农民团体作为改善松巴哇Puncak Ngengas Batu Lanteh生产林管理单位(KPHP)地区农民生计的工具所取得的成功。成功是通过评估农民群体的三个角色来衡量的,即a)学习课堂,b)合作论坛和c)生产单位。本研究分两个阶段进行,即2016年4月和2017年4月。样本由20名有意选择的森林农民组成,通过访谈和焦点小组讨论技术收集数据,并进行描述性分析。这项研究表明,农民群体作为学习课堂和合作论坛的角色尺度被归类为低水平,而作为生产单位的角色尺度则被归类为中等水平。这些类别表明,总的来说,农民群体除了作为生产单位之外,并没有成功地履行其作为学习课堂和合作工具的职能。中间商利用这一薄弱条件,通过控制森林产品价格,从营销活动中获取优势。金田农民群体被归类为初级群体,需要75%的局外人干预,例如顾问的持续指导,以培养从单独工作到团队合作的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
How Does Social Capital Work in Developing Karimunjawa Maritime Tourism? Is It Possible That Marine Based Infrastructure Development is Resolve Inequality Development In the Coastal Community? Islamic Boarding School Based on Women’s Empowerment and Equality Adolescents’ Subjective Well-Being of Indonesian Migrant Worker’s Families: The Role of Social Support and Parental Communication Social and Cultural Capital in Islamic Religious Education: Case Study of Madrasah Diniyah Nurul Huda Sarimulyo Blora
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1