{"title":"Evaluation of Institutional Development : Case on Private Forest Farmer Group in Sumbawa Regency","authors":"D. Diniyati","doi":"10.15294/KOMUNITAS.V11I1.17580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although a large number of studies have been conducted to evaluate the success of farmer groups, a comprehensive evaluations starting from group formation process has not been carried out much. This research rates the success of farmer groups as a vehicle to improve the livelihoods of farmers in the area of Management Unit of Production Forest (KPHP) of Puncak Ngengas-Batu Lanteh, Sumbawa. The success was measured by evaluating three roles of farmer groups namely, a) class for learning, b) forum for collaboration, and c) unit for production. This research was conducted in two periods, i.e. on April 2016 and April 2017. The sample consisted of 20 forest farmers selected purposively, the data were collected through interviews and focus group discussion techniques and analysed descriptively. This study revealed that the roles scale of farmer groups as class for learning and as a forum for collaboration were categorized as low level, while as a unit for production was categorized as moderate level. These categories show that in general the farmer group had not succeeded in carrying out its function as a class for learning, and as a vehicle for collaboration, except as a unit for production. This weak condition was utilized by middlemen to take advantages from marketing activity by controlling forest product prices. The Kanada farmer group was categorized in the beginner group which needs 75 % intervention from outsider such as continual mentoring by counsellors to grow the attitude from working alone to working together in a group. ","PeriodicalId":17912,"journal":{"name":"KOMUNITAS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KOMUNITAS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/KOMUNITAS.V11I1.17580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although a large number of studies have been conducted to evaluate the success of farmer groups, a comprehensive evaluations starting from group formation process has not been carried out much. This research rates the success of farmer groups as a vehicle to improve the livelihoods of farmers in the area of Management Unit of Production Forest (KPHP) of Puncak Ngengas-Batu Lanteh, Sumbawa. The success was measured by evaluating three roles of farmer groups namely, a) class for learning, b) forum for collaboration, and c) unit for production. This research was conducted in two periods, i.e. on April 2016 and April 2017. The sample consisted of 20 forest farmers selected purposively, the data were collected through interviews and focus group discussion techniques and analysed descriptively. This study revealed that the roles scale of farmer groups as class for learning and as a forum for collaboration were categorized as low level, while as a unit for production was categorized as moderate level. These categories show that in general the farmer group had not succeeded in carrying out its function as a class for learning, and as a vehicle for collaboration, except as a unit for production. This weak condition was utilized by middlemen to take advantages from marketing activity by controlling forest product prices. The Kanada farmer group was categorized in the beginner group which needs 75 % intervention from outsider such as continual mentoring by counsellors to grow the attitude from working alone to working together in a group.
尽管已经进行了大量的研究来评估农民群体的成功,但从群体形成过程开始的综合评估并没有进行太多。这项研究评价了农民团体作为改善松巴哇Puncak Ngengas Batu Lanteh生产林管理单位(KPHP)地区农民生计的工具所取得的成功。成功是通过评估农民群体的三个角色来衡量的,即a)学习课堂,b)合作论坛和c)生产单位。本研究分两个阶段进行,即2016年4月和2017年4月。样本由20名有意选择的森林农民组成,通过访谈和焦点小组讨论技术收集数据,并进行描述性分析。这项研究表明,农民群体作为学习课堂和合作论坛的角色尺度被归类为低水平,而作为生产单位的角色尺度则被归类为中等水平。这些类别表明,总的来说,农民群体除了作为生产单位之外,并没有成功地履行其作为学习课堂和合作工具的职能。中间商利用这一薄弱条件,通过控制森林产品价格,从营销活动中获取优势。金田农民群体被归类为初级群体,需要75%的局外人干预,例如顾问的持续指导,以培养从单独工作到团队合作的态度。