{"title":"Rethinking Workplace Learning and Development Catalyzed by Complexity","authors":"Karen E. Watkins, V. Marsick","doi":"10.1177/15344843231186629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workplace learning models were historically developed in a relatively stable, predictable, somewhat compartmentalized world. But today we live in radical uncertainty and contingency. The world is a real-time, real-consequences, multiplayer, high stakes gaming table. No one living through the Global Reset (Schwab & Malleret, 2020) of COVID-19 would have any trouble agreeing that we are in an age of such complexity that it is likely to require a rethinking of all that we do. Complexity has changed the workplace learning playing field. Complexity derives from the Latin word complexus—meaning “surrounding, encompassing”; the past participle of complecti—meaning “to encircle, embrace”; and plectere—meaning “to weave, braid, twine, entwine”. The word complex is “a whole comprised of interconnected parts” (Online Etymology Dictionary) that are also interdependent. Scholars (e.g., Lee, 2003; Weick & Sutcliffe, 2001) began examining complexity’s impact on work and organizations decades ago. What brings it to the fore today? And how in particular is complexity changing workplace learning and development? What features of complexity are impacting their design and implementation? These are the questions we sought to answer in Rethinking Workplace Learning and Development (Watkins & Marsick, 2023). Our book features responses to these questions by a purposeful sample of L&D leaders, who joined us for remote coffee and conversations. We subsequently invited a purposeful sample of leading Workplace Learning & Development practitioners and Chief Learning Officers (CLOs) to discuss how they see Learning & Development adapting to support change in organizations and systems. In this article, we share some of their stories, views and predictions about learning in organizations of different sizes, purposes, and cultures.","PeriodicalId":51474,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"333 - 344"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231186629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Workplace learning models were historically developed in a relatively stable, predictable, somewhat compartmentalized world. But today we live in radical uncertainty and contingency. The world is a real-time, real-consequences, multiplayer, high stakes gaming table. No one living through the Global Reset (Schwab & Malleret, 2020) of COVID-19 would have any trouble agreeing that we are in an age of such complexity that it is likely to require a rethinking of all that we do. Complexity has changed the workplace learning playing field. Complexity derives from the Latin word complexus—meaning “surrounding, encompassing”; the past participle of complecti—meaning “to encircle, embrace”; and plectere—meaning “to weave, braid, twine, entwine”. The word complex is “a whole comprised of interconnected parts” (Online Etymology Dictionary) that are also interdependent. Scholars (e.g., Lee, 2003; Weick & Sutcliffe, 2001) began examining complexity’s impact on work and organizations decades ago. What brings it to the fore today? And how in particular is complexity changing workplace learning and development? What features of complexity are impacting their design and implementation? These are the questions we sought to answer in Rethinking Workplace Learning and Development (Watkins & Marsick, 2023). Our book features responses to these questions by a purposeful sample of L&D leaders, who joined us for remote coffee and conversations. We subsequently invited a purposeful sample of leading Workplace Learning & Development practitioners and Chief Learning Officers (CLOs) to discuss how they see Learning & Development adapting to support change in organizations and systems. In this article, we share some of their stories, views and predictions about learning in organizations of different sizes, purposes, and cultures.
期刊介绍:
As described elsewhere, Human Resource Development Review is a theory development journal for scholars of human resource development and related disciplines. Human Resource Development Review publishes articles that make theoretical contributions on theory development, foundations of HRD, theory building methods, and integrative reviews of the relevant literature. Papers whose central focus is empirical findings, including empirical method and design are not considered for publication in Human Resource Development Review. This journal encourages submissions that provide new theoretical insights to advance our understanding of human resource development and related disciplines. Such papers may include syntheses of existing bodies of theory, new substantive theories, exploratory conceptual models, taxonomies and typology developed as foundations for theory, treatises in formal theory construction, papers on the history of theory, critique of theory that includes alternative research propositions, metatheory, and integrative literature reviews with strong theoretical implications. Papers addressing foundations of HRD might address philosophies of HRD, historical foundations, definitions of the field, conceptual organization of the field, and ethical foundations. Human Resource Development Review takes a multi-paradigm view of theory building so submissions from different paradigms are encouraged.