The dark side of licensing cryptocurrency exchanges as payment institutions

Q2 Social Sciences Law and Financial Markets Review Pub Date : 2019-03-03 DOI:10.1080/17521440.2019.1626545
Hossein Nabilou
{"title":"The dark side of licensing cryptocurrency exchanges as payment institutions","authors":"Hossein Nabilou","doi":"10.1080/17521440.2019.1626545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ultimate objective of cryptocurrencies is to become a payment system substituting, complementing, or competing with the conventional payment systems. Irrespective of whether such an objective could be accomplished, the functional similarities between certain cryptocurrencies and fiat money has persuaded competent authorities of certain EU Member States to grant payment institution licenses to cryptocurrency exchanges. At first blush, granting such an authorization would seem to be a step forward as it would bring otherwise unregulated cryptocurrency exchanges within the scope of the existing payment regulatory framework. However, this authorization effectively applies payment laws to new payment infrastructures that rely on volatile settlement assets with probabilistic finality. Since the volatility and finality risks cannot be fully addressed under the existing payment laws, an alternative policy option would be granting a special license to cryptocurrency businesses or introducing ring-fencing mechanisms to protect the conventional payment systems from the risks of cryptocurrency payments.","PeriodicalId":43241,"journal":{"name":"Law and Financial Markets Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17521440.2019.1626545","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Financial Markets Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2019.1626545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The ultimate objective of cryptocurrencies is to become a payment system substituting, complementing, or competing with the conventional payment systems. Irrespective of whether such an objective could be accomplished, the functional similarities between certain cryptocurrencies and fiat money has persuaded competent authorities of certain EU Member States to grant payment institution licenses to cryptocurrency exchanges. At first blush, granting such an authorization would seem to be a step forward as it would bring otherwise unregulated cryptocurrency exchanges within the scope of the existing payment regulatory framework. However, this authorization effectively applies payment laws to new payment infrastructures that rely on volatile settlement assets with probabilistic finality. Since the volatility and finality risks cannot be fully addressed under the existing payment laws, an alternative policy option would be granting a special license to cryptocurrency businesses or introducing ring-fencing mechanisms to protect the conventional payment systems from the risks of cryptocurrency payments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
授权加密货币交易所作为支付机构的阴暗面
加密货币的最终目标是成为替代、补充或与传统支付系统竞争的支付系统。不管这样的目标是否可以实现,某些加密货币和法定货币之间的功能相似性已经说服了某些欧盟成员国的主管当局向加密货币交易所授予支付机构许可证。乍一看,授予这样的授权似乎是向前迈出的一步,因为它将把原本不受监管的加密货币交易所纳入现有支付监管框架的范围。然而,该授权有效地将支付法律应用于依赖于具有概率终局性的不稳定结算资产的新支付基础设施。由于现有支付法律无法完全解决波动性和最终风险,因此另一种政策选择是向加密货币业务颁发特别许可证或引入围栏机制,以保护传统支付系统免受加密货币支付风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Law and Financial Markets Review is a new, independent, English language journal devoted to providing high quality information, comment and analysis for lawyers specialising in banking and financial market issues and to others with interests in legal and regulatory developments affecting the financial markets. Published four times a year LFMR contains articles written by leading experts providing a forum for practical guidance on, as well as reflective and topical analysis of, all major jurisdictions, with a particular focus on the interaction between the law and market practice and behaviour.
期刊最新文献
The fallout from the forex cartels: what legacy for foreign exchange regulation? Supervision of conduct of business: ensuring a fair deal for clients in Europe’s smallest member state Unleashing India's inventive capital: intellectual property as loan collateral Fintech: finance, technology and regulation The EU proposal for a Regulation on the transparency and integrity of ESG rating activities on 13 June 2023: the missing piece of sustainable finance regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1