Elven-Latin and Semitic Adûnaic: Linguistic, Religious, and Political Strife in Tolkien's Island of Númenor

Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal of Inklings Studies Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.3366/ink.2023.0176
Pamina Fernández Camacho
{"title":"Elven-Latin and Semitic Adûnaic: Linguistic, Religious, and Political Strife in Tolkien's Island of Númenor","authors":"Pamina Fernández Camacho","doi":"10.3366/ink.2023.0176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tolkien's island of Númenor is a window on the classical tradition and its depiction of ancient civilizations such as Egypt, Persia, and Carthage. It connects Tolkien with two nineteenth-century trends: the attempt, fashionable among British intellectuals, to search for the ‘Semitic’ roots of their culture, and the negative association, established by hostile European countries, between the British empire and Carthage. Like Carthage, Númenor is a thalassocracy, engaging in the reviled practice of human sacrifice in honour of Melkor (a name strongly reminiscent of the Phoenician god Melkart), and its language, Adûnaic, has a ‘Semitic colouring’. But this language coexists with another, Quenya, described by Tolkien himself as ‘Elven-Latin’, used for ‘ceremony, and for high matters of lore and song’. Those two languages create a symbolic divide that harkens back to something that affected Tolkien personally: the centuries-long strife between Anglican Protestantism and Catholicism in his own country. This creates an interesting parallel with the original fable used by Tolkien as point of departure: Plato's story of the rise and fall of Atlantis, interpreted by modern scholars as a tale of Athens and its gradual slide into what the philosopher believed to be the wrong path.","PeriodicalId":37069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inklings Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inklings Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ink.2023.0176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tolkien's island of Númenor is a window on the classical tradition and its depiction of ancient civilizations such as Egypt, Persia, and Carthage. It connects Tolkien with two nineteenth-century trends: the attempt, fashionable among British intellectuals, to search for the ‘Semitic’ roots of their culture, and the negative association, established by hostile European countries, between the British empire and Carthage. Like Carthage, Númenor is a thalassocracy, engaging in the reviled practice of human sacrifice in honour of Melkor (a name strongly reminiscent of the Phoenician god Melkart), and its language, Adûnaic, has a ‘Semitic colouring’. But this language coexists with another, Quenya, described by Tolkien himself as ‘Elven-Latin’, used for ‘ceremony, and for high matters of lore and song’. Those two languages create a symbolic divide that harkens back to something that affected Tolkien personally: the centuries-long strife between Anglican Protestantism and Catholicism in his own country. This creates an interesting parallel with the original fable used by Tolkien as point of departure: Plato's story of the rise and fall of Atlantis, interpreted by modern scholars as a tale of Athens and its gradual slide into what the philosopher believed to be the wrong path.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精灵拉丁语和闪米特语Adûnaic:托尔金《努梅诺岛》中的语言、宗教和政治斗争
托尔金的努梅诺岛是一扇了解古典传统及其对埃及、波斯和迦太基等古代文明描绘的窗户。它将托尔金与19世纪的两种趋势联系在一起:一种是英国知识分子试图寻找其文化的“犹太主义”根源,另一种是敌对的欧洲国家在大英帝国和迦太基之间建立的负面联系。与迦太基一样,努梅诺是一个地中海协会,从事为纪念梅尔科(一个让人强烈想起腓尼基神梅尔卡特的名字)而进行的备受诟病的人类祭祀活动,其语言阿都奈克语具有“闪米特色彩”。但这种语言与另一种昆雅语共存,昆雅语被托尔金自己描述为“精灵拉丁语”,用于“仪式、传说和歌曲的高级事务”。这两种语言造成了一种象征性的分歧,这让人想起了影响托尔金个人的事情:在他自己的国家,圣公会新教和天主教之间长达数百年的冲突。这与托尔金作为出发点的原始寓言形成了一个有趣的相似之处:柏拉图关于亚特兰蒂斯兴衰的故事,被现代学者解读为雅典的故事,它逐渐滑向哲学家认为的错误道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Inklings Studies
Journal of Inklings Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Holly Ordway, Tolkien’s Faith: A Spiritual Biography James E. Siburt, Myth, Magic, and Power in Tolkien’s Middle-earth: Developing a Model for Understanding Power and Leadership Adam Edward Carnehl, The Artist as Divine Symbol: Chesterton’s Theological Aesthetic Janka Kascakova and David Levente Palatinus (eds), J.R.R. Tolkien in Central Europe: Contexts, Directions, and the Legacy ‘He seems to be at the back of all the stories’: The Subtlety of Narnian Providence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1