{"title":"Taking Legitimacy Seriously: A Return to Deontology","authors":"Eric Heinze","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3209155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opponents of hate speech bans commonly suggest that messages can enjoy full freedom of expression, but government may nevertheless legitimately regulate the manner of expression. That is often true, as with adjusting noise volumes or preventing litter. However, hate speech bans always impose penalties solely on the basis of offensive or provocative viewpoints, and therefore can never plausibly be called regulations of the sheer manner of expression.","PeriodicalId":81001,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional commentary","volume":"32 1","pages":"631-650"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional commentary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3209155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Opponents of hate speech bans commonly suggest that messages can enjoy full freedom of expression, but government may nevertheless legitimately regulate the manner of expression. That is often true, as with adjusting noise volumes or preventing litter. However, hate speech bans always impose penalties solely on the basis of offensive or provocative viewpoints, and therefore can never plausibly be called regulations of the sheer manner of expression.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
