Psychological aspects of soccer and futsal players: A systematic review

Q3 Psychology Suma Psicologica Pub Date : 2022-04-20 DOI:10.14349/sumapsi.2022.v29.n1.4
Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues Alves, Amanda dos Santos Oliveira, Mayara Juliana Paes, Joice Mara Facco Stefanello
{"title":"Psychological aspects of soccer and futsal players: A systematic review","authors":"Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues Alves, Amanda dos Santos Oliveira, Mayara Juliana Paes, Joice Mara Facco Stefanello","doi":"10.14349/sumapsi.2022.v29.n1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The present systematic review aimed to compile the information available in the literature having to do with sport psychology regarding futsal and soccer players, in order to identify which psychological constructs are being investigated in these athletes and by means of which instruments and analysis techniques. Method: The search was carried out in the APA (PsycINFO), EBSCO (SportDiscus), PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo, Science Direct, Scopus, BVS and EMBASE databases, with the following descriptors: psychological construct; psychological factor; psychological variable; psychological phenomenon; soccer; futsal and athlete, in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Results: Initially, 66 studies met the established eligibility criteria. Of these, 46 studies were conducted with soccer players, 19 with futsal players and one with athletes who participate in both sports. The psychological constructs most studied in the soccer modality were anxiety, stress, motivation, coping, motivational climate, depression, self-efficacy and group cohesion. With regard to the futsal modality, the most studied psychological constructs were group cohesion, perfectionism, motivation, athlete satisfaction, leadership style, perceived parenting styles and burnout. Conclusions: Group cohesion was associated with several other psychological aspects of an individual nature, with cohesion being the construct of both modalities which is of the greatest interest to researchers possibly because it is a collective modality. It can be established that important psychological factors have not been studied in soccer and futsal modalities, especially among female athletes. Therefore, it is recommended that the research carried out with male athletes be extended to include female populations.","PeriodicalId":38992,"journal":{"name":"Suma Psicologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suma Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2022.v29.n1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: The present systematic review aimed to compile the information available in the literature having to do with sport psychology regarding futsal and soccer players, in order to identify which psychological constructs are being investigated in these athletes and by means of which instruments and analysis techniques. Method: The search was carried out in the APA (PsycINFO), EBSCO (SportDiscus), PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo, Science Direct, Scopus, BVS and EMBASE databases, with the following descriptors: psychological construct; psychological factor; psychological variable; psychological phenomenon; soccer; futsal and athlete, in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Results: Initially, 66 studies met the established eligibility criteria. Of these, 46 studies were conducted with soccer players, 19 with futsal players and one with athletes who participate in both sports. The psychological constructs most studied in the soccer modality were anxiety, stress, motivation, coping, motivational climate, depression, self-efficacy and group cohesion. With regard to the futsal modality, the most studied psychological constructs were group cohesion, perfectionism, motivation, athlete satisfaction, leadership style, perceived parenting styles and burnout. Conclusions: Group cohesion was associated with several other psychological aspects of an individual nature, with cohesion being the construct of both modalities which is of the greatest interest to researchers possibly because it is a collective modality. It can be established that important psychological factors have not been studied in soccer and futsal modalities, especially among female athletes. Therefore, it is recommended that the research carried out with male athletes be extended to include female populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
足球和五人制足球运动员的心理方面:系统综述
引言:本系统综述的目的是汇编有关五人制足球和足球运动员的运动心理学文献中的信息,以确定在这些运动员中正在研究哪些心理结构,以及通过哪些工具和分析技术。方法:在APA (PsycINFO)、EBSCO (SportDiscus)、PubMed、Web of Science、Scielo、Science Direct、Scopus、BVS和EMBASE数据库中进行检索,描述词为:心理建构;心理因素;心理变量;心理现象;足球;五人制和运动员,英语,西班牙语和葡萄牙语。结果:最初,66项研究符合既定的资格标准。其中,46项研究是针对足球运动员的,19项是针对五人制足球运动员的,还有一项是针对同时参加两项运动的运动员的。足球模态中研究最多的心理构念是焦虑、压力、动机、应对、动机气候、抑郁、自我效能和群体凝聚力。在五人制运动员形态中,被研究最多的心理构念是群体凝聚力、完美主义、动机、运动员满意度、领导风格、感知父母教养方式和倦怠。结论:群体凝聚力与个体性质的其他几个心理方面有关,凝聚力是两种模式的构建,这可能是研究人员最感兴趣的,因为它是一种集体模式。可以确定的是,在足球和五人制足球运动中,尤其是在女运动员中,重要的心理因素尚未得到研究。因此,建议将以男性运动员为对象进行的研究扩展到女性人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suma Psicologica
Suma Psicologica Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Escala de Percepción de Reforzamiento Medioambiental (EROS): evidencias de validez en una muestra colombiana Changes in food habits and food-related satisfaction before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in dual-earner families with adolescents Resiliencia y violencia en el noviazgo: un estudio explicativopredictivo e instrumental con adolescentes colombianos Minding the gap: The moderating role of education between subjective health and social life perception and Internet use time Valoración de prácticas sociales que hacen uso de especies animales no humanas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1