Classic Anthropological Theories to Help Understand Caregiving and Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic

N. Richards, M. Krawczyk
{"title":"Classic Anthropological Theories to Help Understand Caregiving and Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"N. Richards, M. Krawczyk","doi":"10.1080/19428200.2022.2119753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the COVID-19 global pandemic engendered a new social order, the ultimate shape and permanence of which is still unknown. What is known is that in the short term, experiences of caregiving and dying were profoundly reshaped in reaction to this new contagious threat and the effects of that reshaping are still being felt. though these changes have been unprecedented, foundational anthropology theories continue to have relevance and can aid understanding. Our own expertise is in researching and theorizing how societies organize death and dying — their “death systems” 1 — and the cultural beliefs that emerge to make sense of people’s experiences. Here, we summarize some classic anthropological theories that can contribute to our understanding of how dying, and caring for the dying, was affected during this pandemic. even after the global rollout of vaccines, leading to a decrease in COVID-19-related mortality, we continued to see different countries struggle with how best to care for those with the disease, how to “count” those who died and how to minimize risk through regulating the movement of bodies locally and internationally. We believe that a postpandemic world will continue to contain similar or novel infectious disease outbreaks, either regionally or globally, and that the classic theories we outline here can help us to navigate the future terrain of end-of-life care in the Global North.","PeriodicalId":90439,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology now","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology now","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19428200.2022.2119753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the COVID-19 global pandemic engendered a new social order, the ultimate shape and permanence of which is still unknown. What is known is that in the short term, experiences of caregiving and dying were profoundly reshaped in reaction to this new contagious threat and the effects of that reshaping are still being felt. though these changes have been unprecedented, foundational anthropology theories continue to have relevance and can aid understanding. Our own expertise is in researching and theorizing how societies organize death and dying — their “death systems” 1 — and the cultural beliefs that emerge to make sense of people’s experiences. Here, we summarize some classic anthropological theories that can contribute to our understanding of how dying, and caring for the dying, was affected during this pandemic. even after the global rollout of vaccines, leading to a decrease in COVID-19-related mortality, we continued to see different countries struggle with how best to care for those with the disease, how to “count” those who died and how to minimize risk through regulating the movement of bodies locally and internationally. We believe that a postpandemic world will continue to contain similar or novel infectious disease outbreaks, either regionally or globally, and that the classic theories we outline here can help us to navigate the future terrain of end-of-life care in the Global North.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帮助理解新冠肺炎大流行期间护理和死亡的经典人类学理论
新冠肺炎全球大流行产生了一种新的社会秩序,其最终形态和持久性仍然未知。已知的是,在短期内,照顾和死亡的经历在应对这种新的传染性威胁时发生了深刻的重塑,这种重塑的影响仍然存在。尽管这些变化是前所未有的,但人类学的基础理论仍然具有相关性,有助于理解。我们自己的专业知识是研究和理论化社会如何组织死亡和死亡——他们的“死亡系统”1——以及为理解人们的经历而出现的文化信仰。在这里,我们总结了一些经典的人类学理论,这些理论有助于我们理解在这场疫情期间,死亡和照顾垂死者是如何受到影响的。即使在全球推出疫苗,导致新冠肺炎相关死亡率下降之后,我们仍然看到不同的国家在努力解决如何最好地照顾患者,如何“统计”死亡人数,以及如何通过监管当地和国际上的尸体流动来最大限度地减少风险。我们相信,疫情后的世界将继续在区域或全球范围内遏制类似或新的传染病爆发,我们在这里概述的经典理论可以帮助我们驾驭全球北方未来的临终关怀领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teaching with ChatGPT: Critiquing Generative Artificial Intelligence from the Classroom Anthropology Has One Job (On Genocide in the United States) Traveling Together and Journeying Apart, Revisiting Highway Words, Like Viruses, Spill Over. Consider “Porn” Framing Holism: Sinker, Line and Hook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1