X-ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part II: Sensitivity to Rotation Stage Errors.

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Pub Date : 2019-07-11 DOI:10.1002/HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.6028/JRES.124.015
B. Muralikrishnan, Megan Shilling, Steve Phillips, Wei Ren, Vincent D. Lee, F. Kim
{"title":"X-ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part II: Sensitivity to Rotation Stage Errors.","authors":"B. Muralikrishnan, Megan Shilling, Steve Phillips, Wei Ren, Vincent D. Lee, F. Kim","doi":"10.1002/HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.6028/JRES.124.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of standards for evaluating the performance of X-ray computed tomography (XCT) instruments is ongoing within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) working committees. A key challenge in developing documentary standards is to identify test procedures that are sensitive to known error sources. In Part I of this work, we described the effect of geometry errors associated with the detector and determined their influence through simulations on sphere center-to-center distance errors and sphere form errors for spheres located in the tomographically reconstructed measurement volume. We also introduced a new simulation method, the single-point ray tracing method, to efficiently perform the distance and form error computations and presented data validating the method. In this second part, also based on simulation studies, we describe the effect of errors associated with the rotation stage on sphere center-to-center distance errors and sphere form errors for spheres located in the tomographically reconstructed measurement volume. We recommend optimal sphere center locations that are most sensitive to rotation stage errors for consideration by documentary standards committees in the development of test procedures for performance evaluation.","PeriodicalId":54766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","volume":"124 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.6028/JRES.124.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The development of standards for evaluating the performance of X-ray computed tomography (XCT) instruments is ongoing within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) working committees. A key challenge in developing documentary standards is to identify test procedures that are sensitive to known error sources. In Part I of this work, we described the effect of geometry errors associated with the detector and determined their influence through simulations on sphere center-to-center distance errors and sphere form errors for spheres located in the tomographically reconstructed measurement volume. We also introduced a new simulation method, the single-point ray tracing method, to efficiently perform the distance and form error computations and presented data validating the method. In this second part, also based on simulation studies, we describe the effect of errors associated with the rotation stage on sphere center-to-center distance errors and sphere form errors for spheres located in the tomographically reconstructed measurement volume. We recommend optimal sphere center locations that are most sensitive to rotation stage errors for consideration by documentary standards committees in the development of test procedures for performance evaluation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
X射线计算机断层扫描仪器性能评估,第二部分:对旋转台误差的敏感性。
美国机械工程师学会(ASME)和国际标准化组织(ISO)工作委员会正在制定评估x射线计算机断层扫描(XCT)仪器性能的标准。制定文件标准的一个关键挑战是确定对已知错误源敏感的测试程序。在本工作的第一部分中,我们描述了与探测器相关的几何误差的影响,并通过模拟确定了它们对位于层析重建测量体中的球体的球体中心到中心距离误差和球体形状误差的影响。本文还介绍了一种新的仿真方法——单点光线追踪法,以有效地进行距离和形状误差的计算,并给出了验证该方法的数据。在第二部分中,同样基于仿真研究,我们描述了与旋转阶段相关的误差对层析重建测量体中球体中心到中心距离误差和球体形状误差的影响。我们推荐对旋转阶段误差最敏感的最佳球体中心位置,以供文件标准委员会在制定性能评估测试程序时考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is the flagship publication of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It has been published under various titles and forms since 1904, with its roots as Scientific Papers issued as the Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. In 1928, the Scientific Papers were combined with Technologic Papers, which reported results of investigations of material and methods of testing. This new publication was titled the Bureau of Standards Journal of Research. The Journal of Research of NIST reports NIST research and development in metrology and related fields of physical science, engineering, applied mathematics, statistics, biotechnology, information technology.
期刊最新文献
Disinfection of Respirators with Ultraviolet Radiation. Capacity Models and Transmission Risk Mitigation: An Engineering Framework to Predict the Effect of Air Disinfection by Germicidal Ultraviolet Radiation. Inactivation of Pathogens in Air Using Ultraviolet Direct Irradiation Below Exposure Limits. Acceptance Testing Methodology for the Production of Standard Reference Material 2806: Medium Test Dust in Hydraulic Fluid. Toward a New Primary Standardization of Radionuclide Massic Activity Using Microcalorimetry and Quantitative Milligram-Scale Samples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1