The effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implantation on diabetic macular edema refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Expert Review of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1080/17469899.2022.2118715
Kiyoung Kim, E. Kim, Do Gyun Kim, Seung-Young Yu
{"title":"The effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implantation on diabetic macular edema refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment","authors":"Kiyoung Kim, E. Kim, Do Gyun Kim, Seung-Young Yu","doi":"10.1080/17469899.2022.2118715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implantation for diabetic macular edema (DME) that proved unresponsive to previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. Methods This prospective interventional study recruited 91 patients with refractory DME after previous anti-VEGF treatments in one or both eyes. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST) and macular volume were measured. Results Over the 12 months, a mean of 2.1 ± 0.8 DEX implantations were administered per eye; 26 eyes (28.9%) received 1 implantation, 31 (34.4%) received 2, and 34 (36.7%) received 3. BCVA was significantly improved in the first 6 months, from 54.8 to 59.5 letters. Both CST and macular volume decreased significantly after DEX implantation and maintained these improvements for at least 12 months. Subjects who needed the second DEX implantation had a greater number of prior anti-VEGF injections than did those who needed only one implantation (6.0 vs 3.0). Conclusions Two-thirds of refractory DME required less than two DEX implantations to maintain a dry macula for 12 months. Early switching to intravitreal DEX can be considered as the second-line therapeutic option, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":39989,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2022.2118715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implantation for diabetic macular edema (DME) that proved unresponsive to previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. Methods This prospective interventional study recruited 91 patients with refractory DME after previous anti-VEGF treatments in one or both eyes. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST) and macular volume were measured. Results Over the 12 months, a mean of 2.1 ± 0.8 DEX implantations were administered per eye; 26 eyes (28.9%) received 1 implantation, 31 (34.4%) received 2, and 34 (36.7%) received 3. BCVA was significantly improved in the first 6 months, from 54.8 to 59.5 letters. Both CST and macular volume decreased significantly after DEX implantation and maintained these improvements for at least 12 months. Subjects who needed the second DEX implantation had a greater number of prior anti-VEGF injections than did those who needed only one implantation (6.0 vs 3.0). Conclusions Two-thirds of refractory DME required less than two DEX implantations to maintain a dry macula for 12 months. Early switching to intravitreal DEX can be considered as the second-line therapeutic option, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃体内地塞米松植入治疗抗血管内皮生长因子治疗难治性糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效
摘要目的评价玻璃体内地塞米松(DEX)植入治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)的疗效和安全性,该水肿对先前的抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗无效。方法本前瞻性介入研究招募了91例单眼或双眼接受过抗VEGF治疗的难治性DME患者。所有患者均接受了至少12个月的随访。测量最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中心亚视野厚度(CST)和黄斑体积。结果在12个月内,平均每只眼睛植入2.1±0.8个DEX;26眼(28.9%)接受了1次植入,31眼(34.4%)接受了2次植入,34眼(36.7%)接受了3次植入。BCVA在前6个月显著改善,从54.8个字母增加到59.5个字母。DEX植入后,CST和黄斑体积均显著下降,并保持这些改善至少12个月。与只需要一次植入的受试者相比,需要第二次DEX植入的受受试者之前注射过更多的抗VEGF药物(6.0 vs 3.0)。结论三分之二的难治性DME需要少于两次的DEX植入才能维持干燥黄斑12个月。早期改用玻璃体内DEX可被视为二线治疗选择,尤其是在新冠肺炎大流行期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Ophthalmology
Expert Review of Ophthalmology Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The worldwide problem of visual impairment is set to increase, as we are seeing increased longevity in developed countries. This will produce a crisis in vision care unless concerted action is taken. The substantial value that ophthalmic interventions confer to patients with eye diseases has led to intense research efforts in this area in recent years, with corresponding improvements in treatment, ophthalmic instrumentation and surgical techniques. As a result, the future for ophthalmology holds great promise as further exciting and innovative developments unfold.
期刊最新文献
Advances in the diagnosis of ocular tuberculosis Anterior segment optical coherence tomography in iris and ciliary body tumors: a systematic review Topical ocular local anaesthetics as an adjunctive measure in the day-1 treatment of bacterial keratitis Clinical presentation of ischemic optic neuropathies Crowdsourcing and its applications to ophthalmology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1