One-for-One Companies: Helpful or Harmful?

Grace A. Taylor
{"title":"One-for-One Companies: Helpful or Harmful?","authors":"Grace A. Taylor","doi":"10.14434/iujur.v4i1.24398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One-for-one companies, such as TOMS and Warby Parker, have become a common occurrence in the marketplace. These companies promise to donate a good or service for every product purchased. To date, millions of products have been donated worldwide. This paper seeks to analyze the positive and negative impacts of the one-for-one model on both the one-for-one company and the people receiving product donations. A specific focus of the paper is to determine whether the one-for-one model is helpful or harmful to companies and beneficiaries. To gather information, I contacted sixteen one-for-one companies and asked for reports, gathered preliminary research completed by news outlets such as Forbes and the New York Times, and analyzed academic research. The study finds that the one-for-one model can be both helpful and harmful, depending on the conditions in which the giving is done. For example, if there is an immediate need for a good that cannot be produced in the beneficiary country, then a donation would be beneficial. However, if a donation such as shoes ultimately takes away jobs and reduces the market in the beneficiary country, then it causes more harm and long-term damage than it prevents. As this model becomes more common, it is important that consumers know the impact of their purchases on the beneficiaries and the companies know the benefits and repercussions of their actions.","PeriodicalId":92647,"journal":{"name":"Indiana University journal of undergraduate research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana University journal of undergraduate research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/iujur.v4i1.24398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

One-for-one companies, such as TOMS and Warby Parker, have become a common occurrence in the marketplace. These companies promise to donate a good or service for every product purchased. To date, millions of products have been donated worldwide. This paper seeks to analyze the positive and negative impacts of the one-for-one model on both the one-for-one company and the people receiving product donations. A specific focus of the paper is to determine whether the one-for-one model is helpful or harmful to companies and beneficiaries. To gather information, I contacted sixteen one-for-one companies and asked for reports, gathered preliminary research completed by news outlets such as Forbes and the New York Times, and analyzed academic research. The study finds that the one-for-one model can be both helpful and harmful, depending on the conditions in which the giving is done. For example, if there is an immediate need for a good that cannot be produced in the beneficiary country, then a donation would be beneficial. However, if a donation such as shoes ultimately takes away jobs and reduces the market in the beneficiary country, then it causes more harm and long-term damage than it prevents. As this model becomes more common, it is important that consumers know the impact of their purchases on the beneficiaries and the companies know the benefits and repercussions of their actions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一对一公司:有益还是有害?
一对一的公司,如TOMS和Warby Parker,已经成为市场上常见的事情。这些公司承诺为购买的每一件产品捐赠商品或服务。迄今为止,全球已捐赠了数百万件产品。本文试图分析一对一模式对一公司和接受产品捐赠的人的积极和消极影响。本文的一个具体重点是确定一对一模式对公司和受益人是有益还是有害。为了收集信息,我联系了16家一对一的公司,要求提供报告,收集了《福布斯》和《纽约时报》等新闻媒体完成的初步研究,并分析了学术研究。研究发现,一对一的模式既有帮助,也有有害,这取决于捐赠的条件。例如,如果急需一种无法在受惠国生产的商品,那么捐赠将是有益的。然而,如果像鞋子这样的捐赠最终夺走了受益国的就业机会并减少了市场,那么它所造成的伤害和长期损害就比它所预防的要大。随着这种模式越来越普遍,重要的是消费者要知道他们的购买对受益人的影响,公司也要知道他们行为的好处和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Familiar Music on Long-Term Declarative Memory in College Students Three Strikes and You’re Out: The Demographics of Indiana’s Habitual Offender Law Influences and Willingness to Receive Future COVID-19 Vaccination by Demographic Data and Proposed Interventions Proposed fMRI Study: The Role of Self-Generated Object Formation in Novel Object Category Learning Practices and Perspectives of Mental Health in the Balkan Countries: A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1