Influence of Automated Façades on Occupants

Pedro De la Barra, A. Luna-Navarro, A. Prieto, C. Vásquez, Ulrick Knaack
{"title":"Influence of Automated Façades on Occupants","authors":"Pedro De la Barra, A. Luna-Navarro, A. Prieto, C. Vásquez, Ulrick Knaack","doi":"10.47982/jfde.2022.powerskin.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies performing building simulations showed that the automated control of façades can provide higher levels of indoor environmental quality and lower energy demand in buildings, in comparison to manually controlled scenarios. However, in several case studies with human volunteers, automated  controls were found to be disruptive or unsatisfactory for occupants. For instance, automated façades became a source of dissatisfaction for occupants when they did not fulfil individual environmental requirements, did not provide personal control options, or did not correctly integrate occupant preferences with façade operation in energy-efficient controls. This article reviews current evidence from empirical studies with human volunteers to identify the key factors that affect occupant response to automated façades. Only twenty-six studies were found to empirically investigate occupant response to automated façades from 1998 onwards. Among the reviewed studies, five groups of factors were found to influence occupant interaction with automated façades and namely: (1) personal factors, (2) environmental conditions, (3) type and mode of operation, (4) type of façade technology, and (5) contextual factors.. Overall, occupant response to automated façades is often poorly considered in research studies reviewed because of the following three reasons: (i) the lack of established methods or procedures for assessing occupant response to automated façade controls,  (ii) poor understanding of occupant multi-domain comfort preferences in terms of façade operation, (iii) fragmented research landscape, on one hand results are mainly related to similar contextual or climatic conditions, which undermines their applicability to other climates, while on the other hand the lack of replication within the same conditions, which also undermines replicability within the same condition.  Lastly, this paper suggests future research directions to achieve a holistic and more comprehensive understanding of occupant response to automated façades, aiming to achieve more user-centric automated façade solutions and advanced control algorithms. In particular, research on the impact of personal factors on occupant satisfaction with automated controls is deemed paramount.","PeriodicalId":37451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2022.powerskin.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several studies performing building simulations showed that the automated control of façades can provide higher levels of indoor environmental quality and lower energy demand in buildings, in comparison to manually controlled scenarios. However, in several case studies with human volunteers, automated  controls were found to be disruptive or unsatisfactory for occupants. For instance, automated façades became a source of dissatisfaction for occupants when they did not fulfil individual environmental requirements, did not provide personal control options, or did not correctly integrate occupant preferences with façade operation in energy-efficient controls. This article reviews current evidence from empirical studies with human volunteers to identify the key factors that affect occupant response to automated façades. Only twenty-six studies were found to empirically investigate occupant response to automated façades from 1998 onwards. Among the reviewed studies, five groups of factors were found to influence occupant interaction with automated façades and namely: (1) personal factors, (2) environmental conditions, (3) type and mode of operation, (4) type of façade technology, and (5) contextual factors.. Overall, occupant response to automated façades is often poorly considered in research studies reviewed because of the following three reasons: (i) the lack of established methods or procedures for assessing occupant response to automated façade controls,  (ii) poor understanding of occupant multi-domain comfort preferences in terms of façade operation, (iii) fragmented research landscape, on one hand results are mainly related to similar contextual or climatic conditions, which undermines their applicability to other climates, while on the other hand the lack of replication within the same conditions, which also undermines replicability within the same condition.  Lastly, this paper suggests future research directions to achieve a holistic and more comprehensive understanding of occupant response to automated façades, aiming to achieve more user-centric automated façade solutions and advanced control algorithms. In particular, research on the impact of personal factors on occupant satisfaction with automated controls is deemed paramount.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动化住宅对居住者的影响
几项进行建筑模拟的研究表明,与人工控制的情况相比,自动控制空调可以提供更高水平的室内环境质量和更低的建筑能源需求。然而,在几个人类志愿者的案例研究中,自动控制被发现是破坏性的,或者对居住者不满意。例如,当自动空调不能满足个人环境要求,不能提供个人控制选项,或者在节能控制中没有正确地将乘客的偏好与空调操作结合起来时,就会引起居住者的不满。本文回顾了目前对人类志愿者的实证研究,以确定影响乘员对自动驾驶反应的关键因素。从1998年起,只有26项研究对乘客对自动驾驶汽车的反应进行了实证调查。在回顾的研究中,发现有五组因素影响乘员与自动交通系统的互动,即:(1)个人因素,(2)环境条件,(3)操作类型和模式,(4)交通技术类型,以及(5)环境因素。总的来说,由于以下三个原因,在审查的研究中,乘员对自动交通系统的反应通常没有得到充分考虑:(i)缺乏既定的方法或程序来评估乘员对自动空气污染控制的反应;(ii)对乘员在空气污染操作方面的多域舒适偏好了解不足;(iii)研究景观分散,一方面结果主要与相似的背景或气候条件有关,这破坏了它们对其他气候的适用性;另一方面,在相同条件下缺乏复制。这也破坏了相同条件下的可复制性。最后,本文提出了未来的研究方向,以实现更全面、更全面地了解乘员对自动化道路的反应,旨在实现更以用户为中心的自动化道路解决方案和先进的控制算法。特别是,研究个人因素对乘员对自动控制满意度的影响被认为是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Facade Design and Engineering
Journal of Facade Design and Engineering Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Facade Design and Engineering presents new research results and new proven practice in the field of facade design and engineering. The goal is to improve building technologies, as well as process management and architectural design. This journal is a valuable resource for professionals and academics involved in the design and engineering of building envelopes, including the following disciplines: Architecture Façade Engineering Climate Design Building Services Integration Building Physics Façade Design and Construction Management Novel Material Applications. The journal will be directed at the scientific community, but it will also feature papers that focus on the dissemination of science into practice and industrial innovations. In this way, readers explore the interaction between scientific developments, technical considerations and management issues.
期刊最新文献
Data-driven and LCA-based Framework for environmental and circular assessment of Modular Curtain Walls Energy retrofit with prefabricated timber-based façade modules: pre- and post-comparison between two identical buildings Definition and design of a prefabricated and modular façade system to incorporate solar harvesting technologies Energy-saving potential of thermochromic coatings in transparent building envelope components Off-site prefabricated hybrid façade systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1