{"title":"Special Issue on a vision for corrosion-resistant and resilient reinforced concrete systems: An introduction","authors":"D. Trejo, R. Pillai","doi":"10.1080/23789689.2023.2192557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reinforced concrete is, in general, a very durable system. However, as designers pursue more efficient structural designs and subject these structures to more aggressive environments, these systems become increasingly susceptible to corrosion. Corrosion of steel reinforcement is one of the more prevalent mechanisms of deterioration in reinforced concrete systems. As the world’s infrastructure ages, the cost of repair and replacement of these systems increase at rapid rates. As new models, designs, materials and construction methods become available, the service life of these systems should be extended. This Special Issue initially focuses on current practices used throughout the world to mitigate corrosion of the steel reinforcement embedded in concrete. Alexander et al., Li and Ueda, and Geiker et al. provide an overview for durability based design in South Africa, Asia and Europe. The authors note that both prescriptiveand performance-based methods are currently in use with the objective of ensuring durability. All authors note the use of models, especially models to predict the ingress of chlorides into concrete, should be used to better predict the service life. However, Alexander et al. critique exposure classifications and conclude that both rational service life designs and relevant environmental exposure classifications are sorely needed. The authors also recommend that exposure classifications account for the various factors that influence reinforcement corrosion and the resulting structural damage. Li and Ueda review the state-of-theart of durability design in Asia and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the current practices. The authors ultimately recommend a ‘multi-barrier’ strategy to achieve long-term performance and corrosion resistance of reinforced concrete systems. Geiker at al. provide a European perspective on durability design and argue that designers must understand basic deterioration mechanisms and resulting damage to better design the infrastructure systems. The authors also note that service life models should include the time from corrosion initiation to the end of life (i.e., the propagation phase) to provide more resilient designs. In addition to the design for durability perspectives from the different regions, understanding how to better predict and quantify factors that influence the service life are critical for improving resilience. Ogunsanya et al. present how the use of different de-icing chemicals can influence the critical chloride threshold, a critical parameter for assessing service life. Boschmann Käthler et al. present a review of how the critical chloride threshold values are assessed and make recommendations on how to quantify these critical chloride values. Interestingly, such a critical parameter for assessing the service life of reinforced concrete system has no standardized testing protocol (although advances are underway in several locales). Ahmed and Vaddey present interesting work on chloride testing of various cementitious systems and recommend that water-soluble chloride testing be used to quantify chlorides in concrete. Standardizing testing requirements are essential for ensuring corrosionresistant structures and yet the pursuit is on-going. Shakouri and Dhandapani & Santhanam focus on buildup and transport rates of chlorides in concrete systems. Shakouri reported on the surface build-up rate of chlorides and assesshow these build-up rates influence service life. He concluded that a universal test is needed to assess surface chlorides; interestingly, this is another critical input parameter for assessing the service life and yet there is limited standardization. Shakouri also reported the need for long-term field data. Dhandapani and Santhanam compared various test methods currently used to quantify chloride transport rates under various exposure conditions and report good correlation between several testing methods. Although much of the literature on chloride transport and service life of reinforced concrete systems focus on uncracked concrete, cracking in concrete is common. Yet limited work has been performed to assess how cracks influence corrosion and resulting service life of reinforced concrete systems. O’Reilly et al. assessed the corrosion performance of reinforced concrete specimens containing narrow cracks and reported that these narrow cracks can promote corrosion and potentially","PeriodicalId":45395,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure","volume":"8 1","pages":"143 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2023.2192557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reinforced concrete is, in general, a very durable system. However, as designers pursue more efficient structural designs and subject these structures to more aggressive environments, these systems become increasingly susceptible to corrosion. Corrosion of steel reinforcement is one of the more prevalent mechanisms of deterioration in reinforced concrete systems. As the world’s infrastructure ages, the cost of repair and replacement of these systems increase at rapid rates. As new models, designs, materials and construction methods become available, the service life of these systems should be extended. This Special Issue initially focuses on current practices used throughout the world to mitigate corrosion of the steel reinforcement embedded in concrete. Alexander et al., Li and Ueda, and Geiker et al. provide an overview for durability based design in South Africa, Asia and Europe. The authors note that both prescriptiveand performance-based methods are currently in use with the objective of ensuring durability. All authors note the use of models, especially models to predict the ingress of chlorides into concrete, should be used to better predict the service life. However, Alexander et al. critique exposure classifications and conclude that both rational service life designs and relevant environmental exposure classifications are sorely needed. The authors also recommend that exposure classifications account for the various factors that influence reinforcement corrosion and the resulting structural damage. Li and Ueda review the state-of-theart of durability design in Asia and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the current practices. The authors ultimately recommend a ‘multi-barrier’ strategy to achieve long-term performance and corrosion resistance of reinforced concrete systems. Geiker at al. provide a European perspective on durability design and argue that designers must understand basic deterioration mechanisms and resulting damage to better design the infrastructure systems. The authors also note that service life models should include the time from corrosion initiation to the end of life (i.e., the propagation phase) to provide more resilient designs. In addition to the design for durability perspectives from the different regions, understanding how to better predict and quantify factors that influence the service life are critical for improving resilience. Ogunsanya et al. present how the use of different de-icing chemicals can influence the critical chloride threshold, a critical parameter for assessing service life. Boschmann Käthler et al. present a review of how the critical chloride threshold values are assessed and make recommendations on how to quantify these critical chloride values. Interestingly, such a critical parameter for assessing the service life of reinforced concrete system has no standardized testing protocol (although advances are underway in several locales). Ahmed and Vaddey present interesting work on chloride testing of various cementitious systems and recommend that water-soluble chloride testing be used to quantify chlorides in concrete. Standardizing testing requirements are essential for ensuring corrosionresistant structures and yet the pursuit is on-going. Shakouri and Dhandapani & Santhanam focus on buildup and transport rates of chlorides in concrete systems. Shakouri reported on the surface build-up rate of chlorides and assesshow these build-up rates influence service life. He concluded that a universal test is needed to assess surface chlorides; interestingly, this is another critical input parameter for assessing the service life and yet there is limited standardization. Shakouri also reported the need for long-term field data. Dhandapani and Santhanam compared various test methods currently used to quantify chloride transport rates under various exposure conditions and report good correlation between several testing methods. Although much of the literature on chloride transport and service life of reinforced concrete systems focus on uncracked concrete, cracking in concrete is common. Yet limited work has been performed to assess how cracks influence corrosion and resulting service life of reinforced concrete systems. O’Reilly et al. assessed the corrosion performance of reinforced concrete specimens containing narrow cracks and reported that these narrow cracks can promote corrosion and potentially
期刊介绍:
Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the sustainable development of resilient communities.
Sustainability is defined in relation to the ability of infrastructure to address the needs of the present without sacrificing the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Resilience is considered in relation to both natural hazards (like earthquakes, tsunami, hurricanes, cyclones, tornado, flooding and drought) and anthropogenic hazards (like human errors and malevolent attacks.) Resilience is taken to depend both on the performance of the built and modified natural environment and on the contextual characteristics of social, economic and political institutions. Sustainability and resilience are considered both for physical and non-physical infrastructure.