Is the Future of Peacekeeping Female? Middle Powers, Liberal Internationalism and the 1325 Agenda

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI:10.1080/17502977.2023.2214962
M. Zahar, Laurence Deschamps-Laporte
{"title":"Is the Future of Peacekeeping Female? Middle Powers, Liberal Internationalism and the 1325 Agenda","authors":"M. Zahar, Laurence Deschamps-Laporte","doi":"10.1080/17502977.2023.2214962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n At a time when the liberal international order is in crisis, several middle powers including Canada have taken the lead in pushing for the inclusion of women in peace operations under the banner of the 1325 agenda. This article assesses the implementation of the 1325 agenda in peacekeeping operations. We contend that the limited results of the agenda should primarily be attributed to the way liberal middle powers promoted it, rather than to opposition from conservative or less gendered-minded UN member states. We conclude by reflecting on the vulnerability of this agenda to changes in the dominant international ethos.","PeriodicalId":46629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2023.2214962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT At a time when the liberal international order is in crisis, several middle powers including Canada have taken the lead in pushing for the inclusion of women in peace operations under the banner of the 1325 agenda. This article assesses the implementation of the 1325 agenda in peacekeeping operations. We contend that the limited results of the agenda should primarily be attributed to the way liberal middle powers promoted it, rather than to opposition from conservative or less gendered-minded UN member states. We conclude by reflecting on the vulnerability of this agenda to changes in the dominant international ethos.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维和的未来是女性吗?中等强国、自由国际主义和1325议程
摘要在自由主义国际秩序陷入危机之际,包括加拿大在内的几个中间大国率先在1325议程的旗帜下推动将妇女纳入和平行动。本文评估了1325号决议议程在维和行动中的执行情况。我们认为,该议程的有限结果主要应归因于自由派中间大国推动该议程的方式,而不是来自保守派或性别意识较低的联合国成员国的反对。最后,我们反思了这一议程易受主导国际精神变化影响的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding is a cross-disciplinary journal devoted to critical analysis of international intervention, focussing on interactions and practices that shape, influence and transform states and societies. In 21st century political practice, states and other actors increasingly strive to transplant what they see as normatively progressive political orders to other contexts. Accordingly, JISB focuses on the complex interconnections and mutually shaping interactions between donor and recipient communities within military, economic, social, or other interventional contexts, and welcomes perspectives on political life of, and beyond, European state-building processes. The journal brings together academics and practitioners from cross-disciplinary backgrounds, including international relations, political science, political economy, sociology, international law, social anthropology, geography, and regional studies. The editors are particularly interested in specific or comparative in-depth analyses of contemporary or historical interventions and state-building processes that are grounded in careful fieldwork and/or innovative methodologies. Multi or cross-disciplinary contributions and theoretically challenging pieces that broaden the study of intervention and state building to encompass processes of decision-making, or the complex interplay between actors on the ground, are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Correlates of Peace: Religious Determinants of Interreligious Peace Invoking ‘the Customary’ in the Formalization of Land Reform in Liberia and Sierra Leone Inclusivity in Practice: Patchworks of Inclusion at Multiple Tracks in the Colombian Peace Process Women, Peace and Security in EU Interventions: Analysing EULEX and Operation Irini Local Turn in Knowledge Production About Post-Conflict Societies: The Case of the Balkan Peace Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1