Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review

IF 0.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Digestive Endoscopy Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1755304
P. Pal, M. Ramchandani, P. Inavolu, D. Reddy, M. Tandan
{"title":"Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review","authors":"P. Pal, M. Ramchandani, P. Inavolu, D. Reddy, M. Tandan","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1755304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR.\n Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022.\n Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (TTS) clips, loop and clips, over the scope clips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20–25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery.\n Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.","PeriodicalId":43098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022. Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (TTS) clips, loop and clips, over the scope clips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20–25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery. Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内窥镜全厚度切除术的系统评价
背景 内镜全厚度切除术(EFTR)是一种新兴的治疗选择,用于切除上皮下病变(SELs)和上皮肿瘤。我们旨在系统地回顾EFTR的技术、应用、结果和并发症。方法 使用PubMed进行系统的文献检索。2001年至2022年2月,所有涉及EFTR的相关原创研究文章以及描述新颖/罕见技术的病例报告/系列都被纳入审查。后果 筛选引用文献7739篇,最终纳入参考文献141篇。与暴露的EFTR相比,未暴露的EFTR具有更低的腹膜污染或肿瘤植入的概率。在暴露的EFTR中,与非隧道方法相比,隧道品种的腹膜播种或污染风险较低。闭合技术包括穿透镜(TTS)夹、环和夹、超镜夹(OTSC)、全厚切除装置(FTRD)和内窥镜缝合/折叠/缝合装置。EFTR的适应症范围从食道到直肠,包括固有肌层(MP)、非提升性腺瘤、复发性腺瘤,甚至早期癌症(EGC)或浅表性结直肠癌引起的SEL。其他适应症包括困难部位(涉及阑尾口或憩室)和运动障碍的全厚活检。FTRD的主要局限性是在较小病变(<20-25 mm),这可以通过混合EFTR技术来规避。浅表性胃肠道恶性肿瘤的肿瘤切除和淋巴结清扫可以通过结合EFTR和NOTES的混合自然口-腔内内镜手术(NOTES)来完成。出血、穿孔、阑尾炎、肠结肠瘘、FTRD功能障碍、腹膜肿瘤植入和污染是各种不良事件之一。需要将OTSC后伪影与复发/残留病变区分开来,以避免再次FTRD/手术。结论 EFTR是治疗SELs、复发性和非升降性腺瘤、困难部位肿瘤和浅表胃肠道癌的安全有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
28.60%
发文量
35
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digestive Endoscopy (JDE) is the official publication of the Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India that has over 1500 members. The society comprises of several key clinicians in this field from different parts of the country and has key international speakers in its advisory board. JDE is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, print and online journal publishing quarterly. It focuses on original investigations, reviews, case reports and clinical images as well as key investigations including but not limited to cholangiopancreatography, fluoroscopy, capsule endoscopy etc.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Polyp Detection and Characterization Accidental Ingestion of Live Ants Linear Endoscopic Ultrasound Examination of the Biliary System and Its Clinical Applications Pill Esophagitis: Clinical and Endoscopic Profile Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopic Polyp Detection and Characterization: Merging Computer Technology and Endoscopic Skill for Better Patient Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1