Talking to the Enemy: Difficult Conversations and Ethnopolitical Conflict

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q4 MANAGEMENT Negotiation and Conflict Management Research Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.1111/ncmr.12187
D. Ellis
{"title":"Talking to the Enemy: Difficult Conversations and Ethnopolitical Conflict","authors":"D. Ellis","doi":"10.1111/ncmr.12187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reviews intractability qualities and uses the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as an example of the difficult conversations that characterize the conflict between competing groups. There are two typical research trends for analyzing group conflict. These are either a rational model or intractable conflict model. The rational model assumes that differences are over realistic issues such as scarce resources. The intractable model focuses on identity and emotions. Intractable conflicts are recalcitrant, nonrational, and particularly resistant to resolution. They generate difficult conversations. The argument here demonstrates how intractability establishes the descriptive conditions for difficult conversations about conflicts. These conditions are incommensurate cultural narratives, narrative particularity, existential threat, power differences, and delegitimization. Islam and the West and the Israelis and Palestinians are used as examples. Finally, such difficult divides must attend to five issues that ameliorate difficult conversations, namely, inclusion, maximization of arguments and reasons, controlling undue influences, dialogic equality, and the value of deliberation.","PeriodicalId":45732,"journal":{"name":"Negotiation and Conflict Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ncmr.12187","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Negotiation and Conflict Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The article reviews intractability qualities and uses the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as an example of the difficult conversations that characterize the conflict between competing groups. There are two typical research trends for analyzing group conflict. These are either a rational model or intractable conflict model. The rational model assumes that differences are over realistic issues such as scarce resources. The intractable model focuses on identity and emotions. Intractable conflicts are recalcitrant, nonrational, and particularly resistant to resolution. They generate difficult conversations. The argument here demonstrates how intractability establishes the descriptive conditions for difficult conversations about conflicts. These conditions are incommensurate cultural narratives, narrative particularity, existential threat, power differences, and delegitimization. Islam and the West and the Israelis and Palestinians are used as examples. Finally, such difficult divides must attend to five issues that ameliorate difficult conversations, namely, inclusion, maximization of arguments and reasons, controlling undue influences, dialogic equality, and the value of deliberation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与敌人对话:艰难的对话与民族政治冲突
这篇文章回顾了棘手的品质,并以以巴冲突为例,说明了竞争团体之间冲突的艰难对话。分析群体冲突有两种典型的研究趋势。这些要么是理性模型,要么是棘手的冲突模型。理性模型假设差异是在资源稀缺等现实问题上产生的。这个棘手的模型关注的是身份和情感。难以解决的冲突是顽固的、非理性的,尤其难以解决。它们产生了困难的对话。这里的论点证明了棘手是如何为关于冲突的艰难对话建立描述性条件的。这些条件是文化叙事的不通约性、叙事的特殊性、生存威胁、权力差异和非合法性。伊斯兰教和西方以及以色列人和巴勒斯坦人被用作例子。最后,这种困难的分歧必须涉及五个问题,即包容、论点和理由的最大化、控制不当影响、对话平等和审议的价值,这些问题可以改善困难的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Value from Control: Subjective Valuations of Negotiations by Principals and Agents Why are Women Less Likely to Negotiate? The Influence of Expectancy Considerations and Contextual Framing on Gender Differences in the Initiation of Negotiation There is No Away: Where Do People Go When They Avoid an Interpersonal Conflict? Valuing Cooperation and Constructive Controversy: A Tribute to David W. Johnson Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1