Crowdsourcing and its applications to ophthalmology

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Expert Review of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI:10.1080/17469899.2023.2200935
Junsang Cho, Wendy Zhang, Grayson W. Armstrong, Daniel Cho, S. Culican
{"title":"Crowdsourcing and its applications to ophthalmology","authors":"Junsang Cho, Wendy Zhang, Grayson W. Armstrong, Daniel Cho, S. Culican","doi":"10.1080/17469899.2023.2200935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction The aim of this study was to review the literature on the application of crowdsourcing in the field of ophthalmology. As the concept of crowdsourcing continues to receive interest, this review describes an analysis of the benefits, limitations, and future directions of crowdsourcing in the context of specific cases. A search of major research databases was performed to identify articles with specific reference to crowdsourcing within the field of ophthalmology. Seventeen total studies used crowdsourcing in a branch of ophthalmology. Crowdsourcing was used in three capacities: evaluation of ophthalmic imaging, collection of data, and assessment of surgery or surgical outcomes. Crowdsourcing holds the potential for rapid, economic data processing and reducing the task burden on experts. The main limitation of crowdsourcing is the potential for error due to inexperience of lay assessors. Areas covered Crowdsourcing was applied in three capacities: evaluation of ophthalmic imaging, collection of data, and assessment of surgery or surgical outcomes. Expert opinion Crowdsourcing has been utilized within ophthalmology and holds potential for rapid, economical data processing and reducing task burden on experts. While the use of crowdsourcing may still be nascent, prior reports indicate promise. This report aims to show how crowdsourcing has been applied in ophthalmology. The main limitation of crowdsourcing has been the potential for error due to lay assessor inexperience, though a potential solution is to use trained assessors. We hope to highlight the past, present, and future of crowdsourcing within ophthalmology through this comprehensive review.","PeriodicalId":39989,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","volume":"18 1","pages":"113 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2023.2200935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The aim of this study was to review the literature on the application of crowdsourcing in the field of ophthalmology. As the concept of crowdsourcing continues to receive interest, this review describes an analysis of the benefits, limitations, and future directions of crowdsourcing in the context of specific cases. A search of major research databases was performed to identify articles with specific reference to crowdsourcing within the field of ophthalmology. Seventeen total studies used crowdsourcing in a branch of ophthalmology. Crowdsourcing was used in three capacities: evaluation of ophthalmic imaging, collection of data, and assessment of surgery or surgical outcomes. Crowdsourcing holds the potential for rapid, economic data processing and reducing the task burden on experts. The main limitation of crowdsourcing is the potential for error due to inexperience of lay assessors. Areas covered Crowdsourcing was applied in three capacities: evaluation of ophthalmic imaging, collection of data, and assessment of surgery or surgical outcomes. Expert opinion Crowdsourcing has been utilized within ophthalmology and holds potential for rapid, economical data processing and reducing task burden on experts. While the use of crowdsourcing may still be nascent, prior reports indicate promise. This report aims to show how crowdsourcing has been applied in ophthalmology. The main limitation of crowdsourcing has been the potential for error due to lay assessor inexperience, though a potential solution is to use trained assessors. We hope to highlight the past, present, and future of crowdsourcing within ophthalmology through this comprehensive review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
众包及其在眼科中的应用
摘要:本研究的目的是回顾众包在眼科领域应用的文献。随着众包概念不断受到关注,本文将结合具体案例分析众包的好处、局限性和未来发展方向。我们对主要的研究数据库进行了检索,以确定眼科领域中具体涉及众包的文章。共有17项研究在眼科的一个分支中使用了众包。众包被用于三个方面:眼科成像评估、数据收集和手术或手术结果评估。众包具有快速、经济的数据处理和减轻专家任务负担的潜力。众包的主要限制是由于非专业评估人员缺乏经验而产生错误的可能性。众包在三个方面得到了应用:眼科成像评估、数据收集和手术或手术结果评估。专家意见众包已被应用于眼科,具有快速、经济的数据处理和减轻专家任务负担的潜力。虽然众包的使用可能仍处于萌芽阶段,但之前的报告显示了前景。本报告旨在展示众包在眼科中的应用。众包的主要限制是由于外行评估人员缺乏经验而可能出现错误,尽管一个潜在的解决方案是使用训练有素的评估人员。我们希望通过这篇全面的综述来强调眼科众包的过去、现在和未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Ophthalmology
Expert Review of Ophthalmology Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The worldwide problem of visual impairment is set to increase, as we are seeing increased longevity in developed countries. This will produce a crisis in vision care unless concerted action is taken. The substantial value that ophthalmic interventions confer to patients with eye diseases has led to intense research efforts in this area in recent years, with corresponding improvements in treatment, ophthalmic instrumentation and surgical techniques. As a result, the future for ophthalmology holds great promise as further exciting and innovative developments unfold.
期刊最新文献
How Genome-Wide Association Studies Transform Care for Patients at Risk of Glaucoma. Systemic and Ocular Associations of Keratoconus. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS): a systematic review, implications for the sans case definition Stem cell therapy in retinal diseases: current evidence Morphometric analysis of orbital CT scan in a Jordanian sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1