Demanding recognition: a new Framework for the Study of Political Clientelism

IF 1.9 1区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES African Affairs Pub Date : 2023-05-17 DOI:10.1093/afraf/adad014
Kathleen Klaus, Jeffrey W. Paller, Martha Wilfahrt
{"title":"Demanding recognition: a new Framework for the Study of Political Clientelism","authors":"Kathleen Klaus, Jeffrey W. Paller, Martha Wilfahrt","doi":"10.1093/afraf/adad014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Despite increasingly programmatic politics and competitive elections, political clientelism remains an enduring feature of African politics. More so, while politicians rarely deliver on political promises, citizens continue to demand and participate in patron–client relations. While moral economy and instrumentalist accounts offer insight into the puzzling persistence of political clientelism, we offer an additional framework based on demands for social recognition. Beyond expectations of materialist exchange or the performance of cultural norms, citizens expect their political leaders to recognize them as dignified human beings and members of an identity group. Drawing on evidence from three diverse African contexts—urban Ghana, rural Senegal, and coastal Kenya—we argue that citizens engage in political clientelism as a vehicle for demanding three dimensions of social recognition: (i) To be seen and heard by leaders, (ii) to be respected as agents in the political process, and (iii) to be politically included and protected from harm. By providing new insights into the enduring logics of clientelism, citizen strategies amidst unequal power relationships, and the role of emotions in democratic politics, we aim to reconcile existing approaches and bring them into a more unified framework.","PeriodicalId":7508,"journal":{"name":"African Affairs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adad014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite increasingly programmatic politics and competitive elections, political clientelism remains an enduring feature of African politics. More so, while politicians rarely deliver on political promises, citizens continue to demand and participate in patron–client relations. While moral economy and instrumentalist accounts offer insight into the puzzling persistence of political clientelism, we offer an additional framework based on demands for social recognition. Beyond expectations of materialist exchange or the performance of cultural norms, citizens expect their political leaders to recognize them as dignified human beings and members of an identity group. Drawing on evidence from three diverse African contexts—urban Ghana, rural Senegal, and coastal Kenya—we argue that citizens engage in political clientelism as a vehicle for demanding three dimensions of social recognition: (i) To be seen and heard by leaders, (ii) to be respected as agents in the political process, and (iii) to be politically included and protected from harm. By providing new insights into the enduring logics of clientelism, citizen strategies amidst unequal power relationships, and the role of emotions in democratic politics, we aim to reconcile existing approaches and bring them into a more unified framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
要求承认:政治庇护主义研究的新框架
尽管越来越多的纲领性政治和竞争性选举,政治庇护主义仍然是非洲政治的一个持久特征。更重要的是,尽管政客们很少兑现政治承诺,但公民们继续要求并参与到庇护关系中来。虽然道德经济学和工具主义的解释提供了对政治庇护主义令人费解的持久性的洞察,但我们提供了一个基于社会认可需求的额外框架。除了期待物质交换或文化规范的表现之外,公民还希望他们的政治领导人承认他们是有尊严的人,是一个身份群体的成员。根据来自三个不同非洲背景的证据——加纳城市、塞内加尔农村和肯尼亚沿海——我们认为,公民参与政治庇护主义是一种要求社会认可的三个方面的工具:(i)被领导人看到和听到,(ii)在政治过程中作为代理人受到尊重,(iii)在政治上被纳入并免受伤害。通过对庇护主义的持久逻辑、不平等权力关系中的公民策略以及情感在民主政治中的作用提供新的见解,我们的目标是调和现有的方法,并将它们纳入一个更统一的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Affairs
African Affairs Multiple-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
17.90%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: African Affairs is published on behalf of the Royal African Society. It publishes articles on recent political, social and economic developments in sub-Saharan countries. Also included are historical studies that illuminate current events in the continent. Each issue of African Affairs contains a substantial section of book reviews, with occasional review articles. There is also an invaluable list of recently published books, and a listing of articles on Africa that have appeared in non-Africanist journals.
期刊最新文献
The urbanization of conflict? Patterns of armed conflict and protest in Africa Itinerary of a Christian Ex-Boko Haram bomb maker in Cameroon The production of climate security futures in the West African Sahel Policing and Citizen Trust in Kenya: How Community Policing Shapes Local Trust-Building and Collaboration Stigmatized Professions and Ambiguous Subjects: Methodological Reflections from Sanitation Workers and Opioid Consumption in Sierra Leone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1