Comparative Evaluation of the Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Nalbuphine for Treatment of Post Spinal Shivering-A Randomized Prospective Trial.

H. Kaur, S. Kaur, K. Gupta, Amanjot Singh
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of the Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Nalbuphine for Treatment of Post Spinal Shivering-A Randomized Prospective Trial.","authors":"H. Kaur, S. Kaur, K. Gupta, Amanjot Singh","doi":"10.6859/aja.202209/PP.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nShivering is one of the most common complications of spinal anesthesia because of inhibition of the thermoregulatory control. Dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine are the two commonly used drugs for treatment of perioperative shivering, but owing to paucity of their comparative data, we planned this study to compare the efficacy of these two drugs for treatment of post spinal shivering.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study was conducted on 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II patients aged from 18 to 60 years who developed post-spinal shivering of grade III or IV during elective surgeries. These patients were randomly allocated into two groups (40 each). In group D, dexmedetomidine 0.50 μg/kg, and in group N, nalbuphine 0.08 mg/kg was given intravenously for treatment of shivering. Data regarding response time, recurrence rate and success rate along with their adverse effects were noted, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe mean response time was significantly shorter in group D as compared to Group N (1.9 ± 0.6 min and 4.7 ± 1.1 min, respectively; P < 0.001), but the success rate in both groups was 100%. Recurrence of shivering was greater in group N as compared to group D, but this difference was statistically insignificant. Although hypotension and bradycardia were observed more in group D and nausea was observed more in group N, the difference among both the groups was statistically insignificant.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nDexmedetomidine is a better alternative than nalbuphine for treatment of post spinal shivering with quicker response time and comparable side effects.","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202209/PP.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND Shivering is one of the most common complications of spinal anesthesia because of inhibition of the thermoregulatory control. Dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine are the two commonly used drugs for treatment of perioperative shivering, but owing to paucity of their comparative data, we planned this study to compare the efficacy of these two drugs for treatment of post spinal shivering. METHODS This study was conducted on 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II patients aged from 18 to 60 years who developed post-spinal shivering of grade III or IV during elective surgeries. These patients were randomly allocated into two groups (40 each). In group D, dexmedetomidine 0.50 μg/kg, and in group N, nalbuphine 0.08 mg/kg was given intravenously for treatment of shivering. Data regarding response time, recurrence rate and success rate along with their adverse effects were noted, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS The mean response time was significantly shorter in group D as compared to Group N (1.9 ± 0.6 min and 4.7 ± 1.1 min, respectively; P < 0.001), but the success rate in both groups was 100%. Recurrence of shivering was greater in group N as compared to group D, but this difference was statistically insignificant. Although hypotension and bradycardia were observed more in group D and nausea was observed more in group N, the difference among both the groups was statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS Dexmedetomidine is a better alternative than nalbuphine for treatment of post spinal shivering with quicker response time and comparable side effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射右美托咪定和纳洛酮治疗脊髓后颤抖的比较评价——一项随机前瞻性试验。
背景:由于体温调节控制受到抑制,寒战是脊髓麻醉最常见的并发症之一。右美托咪定和纳布啡是治疗围手术期寒战的两种常用药物,但由于缺乏它们的比较数据,我们计划本研究比较这两种药物治疗脊柱后寒战的疗效。方法对80例18 ~ 60岁的美国麻醉医师协会身体状态为I或II的择期手术中出现III或IV级脊髓后寒战的患者进行研究。这些患者被随机分为两组(每组40例)。D组静脉给予右美托咪定0.50 μg/kg, N组静脉给予纳布啡0.08 mg/kg治疗寒战。记录两组患者的反应时间、复发率、成功率及不良反应数据,采用SPSS软件17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)进行统计分析。结果D组患者的平均反应时间显著短于N组(分别为1.9±0.6 min和4.7±1.1 min);P < 0.001),但两组的成功率均为100%。与D组相比,N组颤抖的复发率更高,但这种差异在统计学上不显著。虽然D组低血压、心动过缓较多,N组恶心较多,但两组间差异无统计学意义。结论右美托咪定治疗脊柱后寒战的疗效优于纳布啡,反应时间短,副作用小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of anesthesiology
Asian journal of anesthesiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.
期刊最新文献
Four Approaches of Styletubation for Handling the Orotracheal Intubation: A Technical Tip. Risk of Dementia After Uterus or Prostate Resection: 17-Year Follow-Up of a Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Comparison of Inter-Incisor Distance as a Predictor of Difficult Intubation in Men and Women-A Prospective Observational Study. Deteriorating Hypotension and Trepopnea During Left Lateral Decubitus Position Before Spinal Anesthesia. Practice Algorithm of Rotational Thromboelastometry-Guided (ROTEM-Guided) Bleeding Management in Liver Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1