Comparison of tragal cartilage and conchal cartilage in tympanoplasty

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Indian Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_142_21
Sohil I. Vadiya, Parth Makwana, S. Khetani, Nisarg Mehta
{"title":"Comparison of tragal cartilage and conchal cartilage in tympanoplasty","authors":"Sohil I. Vadiya, Parth Makwana, S. Khetani, Nisarg Mehta","doi":"10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_142_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and Objectives: The aim and objective of the study are to compare results in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement in cases undergoing tympanoplasty with the use of conchal or tragal cartilage. Materials and Methods: A total of 74 cases of more than 18 and <50 years of age included in this study, where full-thickness cartilage tympanoplasty was performed. Thirty-seven cases included in Group A where tragal full-thickness cartilage was used and 37 cases included in Group B where full-thickness conchal cartilage was used. Results: Thirty-six (97.3%) cases in Group A and 35 (94.6%) cases in Group B had successful and complete graft uptake in this study. Hearing improvement was found to be better with the cases in Group B than Group A. Conclusion: Full-thickness conchal cartilage and tragal cartilage give good graft uptake results and hearing improvement is significantly better with the use of conchal cartilage.","PeriodicalId":44304,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otology","volume":"28 1","pages":"41 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_142_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: The aim and objective of the study are to compare results in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement in cases undergoing tympanoplasty with the use of conchal or tragal cartilage. Materials and Methods: A total of 74 cases of more than 18 and <50 years of age included in this study, where full-thickness cartilage tympanoplasty was performed. Thirty-seven cases included in Group A where tragal full-thickness cartilage was used and 37 cases included in Group B where full-thickness conchal cartilage was used. Results: Thirty-six (97.3%) cases in Group A and 35 (94.6%) cases in Group B had successful and complete graft uptake in this study. Hearing improvement was found to be better with the cases in Group B than Group A. Conclusion: Full-thickness conchal cartilage and tragal cartilage give good graft uptake results and hearing improvement is significantly better with the use of conchal cartilage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼓室成形术中耳甲软骨与耳甲软骨的比较
目的和目的:本研究的目的和目的是比较使用耳甲软骨或耳甲软骨进行鼓室成形术的患者在移植物吸收和听力改善方面的结果。材料与方法:本研究共纳入74例18岁以上、50岁以下患者,行全层软骨鼓室成形术。A组采用耳甲全层软骨37例,B组采用耳甲全层软骨37例。结果:A组36例(97.3%)和B组35例(94.6%)患者成功完成移植物摄取。结论:全层耳甲软骨和耳甲软骨移植的听力改善效果较好,使用全层耳甲软骨对听力的改善效果明显好于a组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Otology
Indian Journal of Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Comparative study between anterior tucking and tunneling of graft in Type-1 tympanoplasty A comparative study of endoscopic versus microscopic tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media Application of finite element model of middle ear in the study of the middle ear biomechanics in normal and diseased states Transmastoid titanium mesh assisted extra dural layered closure of tegmen defect: Case report in a 10 year old Acoustic trauma in soldiers: Pure-tone audiometry versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a tool for early detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1