Dutch first in Dutch higher education policy

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Policy Futures in Education Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1177/14782103231175943
Jessica Schiltmans
{"title":"Dutch first in Dutch higher education policy","authors":"Jessica Schiltmans","doi":"10.1177/14782103231175943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past 15 years, the number of international students in tertiary education doubled to reach 5.6 million students in 2018 and is expected to grow to 6.9 million in 2030 (Choudaha and Van Rest, 2018). In the Netherlands, the percentage of international degree seeking students is relatively high and growing fast from 4% in 2010 to more than 10% in 2017 where the average in OECD countries was 6% (OECD, 2020). Initially, this growth was perceived as positive, seen as a sign of good quality of Dutch higher education, and it was stimulated by government policy. However in the past few years, this development has led to a public debate on the downsides of this growth; the accessibility- and the quality of higher education (IBO, 2019). The latter being impacted by increased pressure on HEI because of growing student numbers. The use of the English language is also part of the discussion on quality. The debate eventually resulted in a policy proposal called Taal en Toegankelijkheid which translates into Language and Accessibility that was sent to the House of Representatives by the Minister of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) in September 2019 (Van Engelshoven, 2019b). The aim of the bill is to safeguard the quality of education, promote Dutch language skills, to guarantee accessibility of higher education and to control the influx of international students in the Netherlands (Van Engelshoven, 2019a). Before the bill was approved by the Senate, the Dutch Cabinet stepped out of power in January 2021 and the bill was declared controversial which means no decision will be made until a new Cabinet is installed (Bikker, 2021). Using the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF), this paper unravels the agenda-setting process that has led to the aforementioned government policy proposal.","PeriodicalId":46984,"journal":{"name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Futures in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231175943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past 15 years, the number of international students in tertiary education doubled to reach 5.6 million students in 2018 and is expected to grow to 6.9 million in 2030 (Choudaha and Van Rest, 2018). In the Netherlands, the percentage of international degree seeking students is relatively high and growing fast from 4% in 2010 to more than 10% in 2017 where the average in OECD countries was 6% (OECD, 2020). Initially, this growth was perceived as positive, seen as a sign of good quality of Dutch higher education, and it was stimulated by government policy. However in the past few years, this development has led to a public debate on the downsides of this growth; the accessibility- and the quality of higher education (IBO, 2019). The latter being impacted by increased pressure on HEI because of growing student numbers. The use of the English language is also part of the discussion on quality. The debate eventually resulted in a policy proposal called Taal en Toegankelijkheid which translates into Language and Accessibility that was sent to the House of Representatives by the Minister of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) in September 2019 (Van Engelshoven, 2019b). The aim of the bill is to safeguard the quality of education, promote Dutch language skills, to guarantee accessibility of higher education and to control the influx of international students in the Netherlands (Van Engelshoven, 2019a). Before the bill was approved by the Senate, the Dutch Cabinet stepped out of power in January 2021 and the bill was declared controversial which means no decision will be made until a new Cabinet is installed (Bikker, 2021). Using the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF), this paper unravels the agenda-setting process that has led to the aforementioned government policy proposal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰高等教育政策中的荷兰第一
在过去的15年里,高等教育的国际学生人数翻了一番,2018年达到560万,预计到2030年将增长到690万(Choudaha和Van Rest,2018)。在荷兰,寻求国际学位的学生比例相对较高,并从2010年的4%快速增长到2017年的10%以上,经合组织国家的平均水平为6%(经合组织,2020)。最初,这种增长被认为是积极的,被视为荷兰高等教育质量良好的标志,并受到政府政策的刺激。然而,在过去几年中,这一事态发展引发了关于这种增长的负面影响的公开辩论;高等教育的可及性和质量(IBO,2019)。后者由于学生人数的增加而受到高等教育压力增加的影响。英语的使用也是关于质量的讨论的一部分。这场辩论最终产生了一项名为Taal en Toegankelijkheid的政策提案,该提案翻译为语言和无障碍,由教育、文化和科学部长于2019年9月发送给众议院(Van Engelshoven,2019b)。该法案的目的是保障教育质量,提高荷兰语技能,保障高等教育的可及性,并控制国际学生涌入荷兰(Van Engelshoven,2019a)。在该法案获得参议院批准之前,荷兰内阁于2021年1月下台,该法案被宣布有争议,这意味着在新内阁成立之前不会做出任何决定(Bikker,2021)。本文使用多流框架(MSF),揭示了导致上述政府政策提案的议程制定过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Policy Futures in Education
Policy Futures in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
An analysis of Australian teacher workforce policy: Challenges and opportunities for teacher recruitment and retention Guest editorial: Considering the global-local relationships in education Perpetual emergency education: Urban refugee education in Thailand is disrupted during the COVID-19 Governance dynamics and local autonomy in large-scale governmental funding: The case of Sweden’s campaign to improve equity Tracing neoliberal discourse in school documentation. The analysis of educational projects in Barcelona state schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1