Development of the “literary evolution” concept by Yuri Tynyanov in the works of Sergei Averintsev

A. Markov
{"title":"Development of the “literary evolution” concept by Yuri Tynyanov in the works of Sergei Averintsev","authors":"A. Markov","doi":"10.54103/2037-2426/15219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the concept of “literary evolution” proposed by Yuri Tynyanov could not be applied to the late Soviet official literature, Sergei Averintsev using this concept examined the relationship between philosophy, sophistry, rhetorics and everyday consciousness in classical Greece. Tynyanov's theory of “parallel series” turned out to be productive for the reconstruction of the tasks of the ancient philosopher and for the interpretation of Plato's dialogues. According Averintsev, Plato acted within the sophistic field, creating irreducible terminology and untranslatable phrases as a moment of the entire further evolution of Western literature. Consideration of Russian formalism as the context of Averintsev's thought proves his contribution to the discussion of Platonism as a tool for posing philosophical problems and of the perspective of philosophy in the postcolonial discussion. \n","PeriodicalId":41992,"journal":{"name":"Enthymema-International Journal of Literary Criticism Literary Theory and Philosophy of Literature","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enthymema-International Journal of Literary Criticism Literary Theory and Philosophy of Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-2426/15219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the concept of “literary evolution” proposed by Yuri Tynyanov could not be applied to the late Soviet official literature, Sergei Averintsev using this concept examined the relationship between philosophy, sophistry, rhetorics and everyday consciousness in classical Greece. Tynyanov's theory of “parallel series” turned out to be productive for the reconstruction of the tasks of the ancient philosopher and for the interpretation of Plato's dialogues. According Averintsev, Plato acted within the sophistic field, creating irreducible terminology and untranslatable phrases as a moment of the entire further evolution of Western literature. Consideration of Russian formalism as the context of Averintsev's thought proves his contribution to the discussion of Platonism as a tool for posing philosophical problems and of the perspective of philosophy in the postcolonial discussion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尤里·泰尼扬诺夫“文学进化”概念在谢尔盖·阿维林采夫作品中的发展
由于尤里·泰尼扬诺夫提出的“文学进化”概念不能适用于苏联后期的官方文学,谢尔盖·阿维林采夫利用这一概念考察了古典希腊哲学、诡辩、修辞学和日常意识之间的关系。Tynyanov的“平行序列”理论对古代哲学家的任务重建和柏拉图对话录的解释都是有益的。根据Averintsev的说法,柏拉图在诡辩领域中行动,创造了不可简化的术语和不可翻译的短语,作为西方文学进一步发展的一个时刻。以俄国形式主义为背景考察阿维林采夫的思想,可以证明他对柏拉图主义作为提出哲学问题的工具的讨论以及在后殖民讨论中哲学视角的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wilhelm Dilthey e il secondo mondo della letteratura Dispositivo ecfrastico e la sua temporalità Édouard Glissant e Salman Rushdie. Pensare il mondo, scrivere il mondo Interactivist Refutation of Radical Epistemic Skepticism Characteristic of Postmodern Literary Studies and Fiction Recensione di Emanuela Piga Bruni, La macchina fragile. L’inconscio artificiale fra letteratura, cinema e televisione (Carocci, 2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1