Interactivist Refutation of Radical Epistemic Skepticism Characteristic of Postmodern Literary Studies and Fiction

J. Teske, Robert Mirski
{"title":"Interactivist Refutation of Radical Epistemic Skepticism Characteristic of Postmodern Literary Studies and Fiction","authors":"J. Teske, Robert Mirski","doi":"10.54103/2037-2426/19781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postmodern fiction and literary theory have endorsed radical skepticism about knowledge, which was partly conditioned by philosophers’ inability to provide a viable epistemology that would resolve the radical skeptical problems. Most recent developments in both fiction and theory have largely ignored the apparently still unresolved issue and have instead embraced the position of active commitment that presupposes that knowledge is in fact possible. In this text, we address this apparent oversight and present an interactivist ontology of the mind and culture that explains how we can acquire knowledge about the world, and why the postmodern radical skepticism is ungrounded. We argue that once the interactivist theory of cognition as well as ontology of the mind and culture are assumed, the skeptical problems that troubled postmodern thought become non-problems and further pursuit of epistemically evaluable theory of culture (fiction included) gains solid theoretical grounds.","PeriodicalId":41992,"journal":{"name":"Enthymema-International Journal of Literary Criticism Literary Theory and Philosophy of Literature","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enthymema-International Journal of Literary Criticism Literary Theory and Philosophy of Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-2426/19781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postmodern fiction and literary theory have endorsed radical skepticism about knowledge, which was partly conditioned by philosophers’ inability to provide a viable epistemology that would resolve the radical skeptical problems. Most recent developments in both fiction and theory have largely ignored the apparently still unresolved issue and have instead embraced the position of active commitment that presupposes that knowledge is in fact possible. In this text, we address this apparent oversight and present an interactivist ontology of the mind and culture that explains how we can acquire knowledge about the world, and why the postmodern radical skepticism is ungrounded. We argue that once the interactivist theory of cognition as well as ontology of the mind and culture are assumed, the skeptical problems that troubled postmodern thought become non-problems and further pursuit of epistemically evaluable theory of culture (fiction included) gains solid theoretical grounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后现代文学研究和小说的激进认知怀疑主义特征的互动主义反驳
后现代小说和文学理论支持对知识的激进怀疑主义,这在一定程度上是因为哲学家无法提供一种可行的认识论来解决激进的怀疑主义问题。小说和理论的最新发展在很大程度上忽略了这个显然仍未解决的问题,而是接受了积极承诺的立场,这种立场以知识事实上是可能的为前提。在本文中,我们解决了这一明显的疏忽,并提出了一个关于思想和文化的互动主义本体论,解释了我们如何获得关于世界的知识,以及为什么后现代激进怀疑论是没有根据的。我们认为,一旦假设了互动主义的认知理论以及心理和文化本体论,困扰后现代思想的怀疑问题就不再是问题,进一步追求可认知评估的文化理论(包括小说)就获得了坚实的理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wilhelm Dilthey e il secondo mondo della letteratura Dispositivo ecfrastico e la sua temporalità Édouard Glissant e Salman Rushdie. Pensare il mondo, scrivere il mondo Interactivist Refutation of Radical Epistemic Skepticism Characteristic of Postmodern Literary Studies and Fiction Recensione di Emanuela Piga Bruni, La macchina fragile. L’inconscio artificiale fra letteratura, cinema e televisione (Carocci, 2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1