On the Legal Person Personality Denial System

Niu Jingbo
{"title":"On the Legal Person Personality Denial System","authors":"Niu Jingbo","doi":"10.22158/sssr.v4n2p26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Company personality independence and shareholders limited liability is the basic principles of the company law, legal person personality denial system is the company personality independence and shareholders limited liability exceptions, legal person personality denial system stipulates the abuse of company legal person independent status and shareholders limited liability shareholders bear joint and several liability for the company’s debt, the responsibility of the system does not involve the actual control of the company. But in reality, no matter what the size or nature of the company, the emergence of the actual controllers is always inevitable and commonplace. The actual controller of the company is not a shareholder of the company in small and medium-sized enterprises, but they often use their dominant position to abuse the independent status of the company and infringe the interests of creditors. Usually, the practice is to control the company through other shareholders in the form of capital contribution or manipulate the company in other ways. In view of the prominent problem that the actual controller abusing the independent status of legal person infringes on the interests of creditors in practice, it is necessary to summarize the judicial practice experience to strengthen the responsibility of the actual controller. Whether the legal personality denial system as the basis of the judgment is applicable to the actual controller is worth thinking and studying.","PeriodicalId":74882,"journal":{"name":"Studies in social science research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in social science research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/sssr.v4n2p26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Company personality independence and shareholders limited liability is the basic principles of the company law, legal person personality denial system is the company personality independence and shareholders limited liability exceptions, legal person personality denial system stipulates the abuse of company legal person independent status and shareholders limited liability shareholders bear joint and several liability for the company’s debt, the responsibility of the system does not involve the actual control of the company. But in reality, no matter what the size or nature of the company, the emergence of the actual controllers is always inevitable and commonplace. The actual controller of the company is not a shareholder of the company in small and medium-sized enterprises, but they often use their dominant position to abuse the independent status of the company and infringe the interests of creditors. Usually, the practice is to control the company through other shareholders in the form of capital contribution or manipulate the company in other ways. In view of the prominent problem that the actual controller abusing the independent status of legal person infringes on the interests of creditors in practice, it is necessary to summarize the judicial practice experience to strengthen the responsibility of the actual controller. Whether the legal personality denial system as the basis of the judgment is applicable to the actual controller is worth thinking and studying.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论法人人格否认制度
公司人格独立和股东有限责任是公司法的基本原则,法人人格否认制度是公司人格独立和股东有限责任的例外,法人人格否认制度规定公司法人独立地位和股东有限责任的滥用,股东对公司债务承担连带责任;责任制不涉及公司的实际控制权。但在现实中,无论公司的规模或性质如何,实际控制人的出现总是不可避免的,也是司空见惯的。在中小企业中,公司实际控制人并非公司股东,但往往利用支配地位滥用公司的独立地位,侵害债权人的利益。通常的做法是通过其他股东以出资的形式控制公司或以其他方式操纵公司。针对实践中实际控制人滥用法人独立地位侵害债权人利益的突出问题,有必要总结司法实践经验,强化实际控制人责任。作为判断依据的法人人格否认制度是否适用于实际控制人值得思考和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Field Research on Corruption in Private Enterprise -- Taking the "Criminal Law Amendment (12)" as an Opportunity The Relationship between Physical Exercise and Subjective Well-being: a Meta-Analysis based on The Chinese Student Population Application of Power Electronics Technology in Renewable Energy Systems Susan Glaspell’s “Trifles”: A Feminist/Post-Structuralist Reading Research on the Constitutional Reform of Kyrgyzstan and Its Influence on Political Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1