Reading Poetry and Prose: Eye Movements and Acoustic Evidence

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Discourse Processes Pub Date : 2022-01-25 DOI:10.1080/0163853X.2021.2015188
Stefan Blohm, Stefano Versace, Sanja Methner, Valentin Wagner, M. Schlesewsky, Winfried Menninghaus
{"title":"Reading Poetry and Prose: Eye Movements and Acoustic Evidence","authors":"Stefan Blohm, Stefano Versace, Sanja Methner, Valentin Wagner, M. Schlesewsky, Winfried Menninghaus","doi":"10.1080/0163853X.2021.2015188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We examined genre-specific reading strategies for literary texts and hypothesized that text categorization (literary prose vs. poetry) modulates both how readers gather information from a text (eye movements) and how they realize its phonetic surface form (speech production). We recorded eye movements and speech while college students (N = 32) orally read identical texts that we categorized and formatted as either literary prose or poetry. We further varied the text position of critical regions (text-initial vs. text-medial) to compare how identical information is read and articulated with and without context; this allowed us to assess whether genre-specific reading strategies make differential use of identical context information. We observed genre-dependent differences in reading and speaking tempo that reflected several aspects of reading and articulation. Analyses of regions of interests revealed that word-skipping increased particularly while readers progressed through the texts in the prose condition; speech rhythm was more pronounced in the poetry condition irrespective of the text position. Our results characterize strategic poetry and prose reading, indicate that adjustments of reading behavior partly reflect differences in phonetic surface form, and shed light onto the dynamics of genre-specific literary reading. They generally support a theory of literary comprehension that assumes distinct literary processing modes and incorporates text categorization as an initial processing step.","PeriodicalId":11316,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Processes","volume":"59 1","pages":"159 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Processes","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.2015188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examined genre-specific reading strategies for literary texts and hypothesized that text categorization (literary prose vs. poetry) modulates both how readers gather information from a text (eye movements) and how they realize its phonetic surface form (speech production). We recorded eye movements and speech while college students (N = 32) orally read identical texts that we categorized and formatted as either literary prose or poetry. We further varied the text position of critical regions (text-initial vs. text-medial) to compare how identical information is read and articulated with and without context; this allowed us to assess whether genre-specific reading strategies make differential use of identical context information. We observed genre-dependent differences in reading and speaking tempo that reflected several aspects of reading and articulation. Analyses of regions of interests revealed that word-skipping increased particularly while readers progressed through the texts in the prose condition; speech rhythm was more pronounced in the poetry condition irrespective of the text position. Our results characterize strategic poetry and prose reading, indicate that adjustments of reading behavior partly reflect differences in phonetic surface form, and shed light onto the dynamics of genre-specific literary reading. They generally support a theory of literary comprehension that assumes distinct literary processing modes and incorporates text categorization as an initial processing step.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
读诗文:眼动与声学证据
摘要:我们研究了文学文本的特定类型阅读策略,并假设文本分类(文学散文与诗歌)既调节了读者从文本中收集信息的方式(眼球运动),也调节了他们如何实现文本的语音表面形式(言语产生)。当大学生(N=32)口头阅读我们分类并格式化为文学散文或诗歌的相同文本时,我们记录了他们的眼球运动和言语。我们进一步改变了关键区域的文本位置(文本首字母与文本中间字母),以比较在有上下文和无上下文的情况下如何阅读和表达相同的信息;这使我们能够评估特定类型的阅读策略是否对相同的上下文信息进行了差异化利用。我们观察到在阅读和口语节奏方面存在着与体裁相关的差异,这些差异反映了阅读和发音的几个方面。对兴趣区域的分析表明,在散文条件下,当读者阅读文本时,跳字现象尤其明显;在诗歌条件下,无论文本位置如何,语音节奏都更为明显。我们的研究结果表征了策略性诗歌和散文阅读,表明阅读行为的调整部分反映了语音表面形式的差异,并揭示了特定类型文学阅读的动态。他们通常支持一种文学理解理论,该理论假设不同的文学处理模式,并将文本分类作为初始处理步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Discourse Processes is a multidisciplinary journal providing a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas from diverse disciplines sharing a common interest in discourse--prose comprehension and recall, dialogue analysis, text grammar construction, computer simulation of natural language, cross-cultural comparisons of communicative competence, or related topics. The problems posed by multisentence contexts and the methods required to investigate them, although not always unique to discourse, are sufficiently distinct so as to require an organized mode of scientific interaction made possible through the journal.
期刊最新文献
Can gestures speak louder than words? The effect of gestural discourse markers on discourse expectations. Dyadic differences in empathy scores are associated with kinematic similarity during conversational question-answer pairs. The underlying mechanisms of the persuasiveness of different types of satirical news messages. Children’s understanding of referential nominal metaphors: a path to the heart of text comprehension An interactional practice of registering expectation discrepancy: the use of the turn-initial token are in Japanese
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1