The Participatory Design and Management of Public Open Space through the Digital Portal

Q2 Social Sciences Built Environment Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.2148/benv.48.2.280
Matej Niksic
{"title":"The Participatory Design and Management of Public Open Space through the Digital Portal","authors":"Matej Niksic","doi":"10.2148/benv.48.2.280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the European context, various e-participatory tools have been introduced in the last two decades that are often used without giving citizens a co-deciding role. The article explores this in the case of Ljubljana, the capital city of Slovenia, by analysing the public portal for the\n citizens' initiatives that was developed by the local government. It analyses the characteristics of the portal. Choosing a testing area, it addresses the following questions: what kind of projects are being proposed by citizens? Are these proposals addressing future development challenges\n or merely current maintenance issues? How does the city administration handle these initiatives at the level of communication – do they provide precise replies to questions, proposals, and arguments? Are development-oriented citizens' initiatives considered by the city authorities? The\n article argues that the portal is more of a crowdsourced way of monitoring the maintenance-related issues across the city and has not much to do with the collection of the citizens' initiatives related to qualitative improvements to the city. Understanding the deficiencies of such portals\n in the context of the Global North it points out the need for a more critical transfer of digital tools to the Global South where the participatory practices in designing and managing public open spaces are more fragile.","PeriodicalId":53715,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.48.2.280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the European context, various e-participatory tools have been introduced in the last two decades that are often used without giving citizens a co-deciding role. The article explores this in the case of Ljubljana, the capital city of Slovenia, by analysing the public portal for the citizens' initiatives that was developed by the local government. It analyses the characteristics of the portal. Choosing a testing area, it addresses the following questions: what kind of projects are being proposed by citizens? Are these proposals addressing future development challenges or merely current maintenance issues? How does the city administration handle these initiatives at the level of communication – do they provide precise replies to questions, proposals, and arguments? Are development-oriented citizens' initiatives considered by the city authorities? The article argues that the portal is more of a crowdsourced way of monitoring the maintenance-related issues across the city and has not much to do with the collection of the citizens' initiatives related to qualitative improvements to the city. Understanding the deficiencies of such portals in the context of the Global North it points out the need for a more critical transfer of digital tools to the Global South where the participatory practices in designing and managing public open spaces are more fragile.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于数字门户的公共开放空间参与式设计与管理
在欧洲背景下,在过去二十年中引入了各种电子参与工具,这些工具的使用往往没有赋予公民共同决定的角色。文章以斯洛文尼亚首都卢布尔雅那为例,通过分析当地政府开发的公民倡议公共门户网站,探讨了这一点。分析了门户网站的特点。选择一个测试区,它解决了以下问题:公民提出了什么样的项目?这些建议是针对未来的发展挑战,还是仅仅针对当前的维护问题?城市管理部门如何在沟通层面处理这些举措——它们是否对问题、建议和争论提供了准确的答复?城市当局是否考虑了以发展为导向的公民倡议?文章认为,该门户网站更多的是一种众包方式,用于监测整个城市的维护相关问题,与收集与城市质量改善相关的公民倡议没有太大关系。了解这些门户网站在全球北方的不足之处,它指出需要将数字工具更关键地转移到全球南方,在那里,设计和管理公共开放空间的参与性做法更为脆弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Built Environment
Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Carceral Displacement: The Root Shock of Mass Criminalization Displacement in Place: Root Shock in the Pearse Street Community, Dublin Root Shock's Missing Appendix Using Situation Analysis for Critical Policy Studies and Beyond Root Shock as Social Discipline Marginalization and Racism in Irish Social, Asylum, and Refugee Policies 'We Couldn't Get the Big Win' A Situation Analysis of the Stress of Gentrification at Differing Points in the Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1