Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic response on the Emergency Medical Services workforce, Texas, USA

Q3 Medicine Journal of Emergency Management Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.5055/jem.0761
Maria Mendez, J. Horney
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic response on the Emergency Medical Services workforce, Texas, USA","authors":"Maria Mendez, J. Horney","doi":"10.5055/jem.0761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The physical and mental health impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response on healthcare workers has been extensively studied; less is known about impacts specific to the prehospital Emergency Medical Service’s (EMS) workforce. However, given data about the physical and psychological impacts to EMS workers participating in prior emergencies and disasters, the response to the COVID-19 pandemic likely increased risk among the EMS workforce. \nMethods: EMS agencies in the State of Texas were stratified according to agency structure, eg, fire-based, nonfire-based governmental, hospital-based private, nonhospital-based private, and other. A systematic sample of 10 agencies was selected from each of the five strata. An interview guide was developed to collect information about prior experience with disaster or emergency response, professional roles since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, and alternations to professional roles and EMS systems during both prior responses and the COVID-19 response. Interviews were transcribed and inductively coded to identify themes. \nResults: Five themes were identified in qualitative interviews. These included 1) early pandemic lessons, 2) protocol changes, 3) personal stressors, 4) professional stressors, and 5) lessons learned. Increased workloads, operational changes, fear of transmission to friends and family, and fatigue from working conditions were emphasized by participants. However, adaptations are being identified that could help EMS agencies and their workforces maintain resilience, even during an ongoing emergency response. \nDiscussion: The COVID-19 response created unique professional and personal stressors to the EMS workforce and limited access to coping mechanisms previously used to reduce stress. Targeted studies are needed to guide the implementation of evidence-based interventions to protect the well-being of EMS personnel now and during future public health emergency and disaster responses.","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The physical and mental health impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response on healthcare workers has been extensively studied; less is known about impacts specific to the prehospital Emergency Medical Service’s (EMS) workforce. However, given data about the physical and psychological impacts to EMS workers participating in prior emergencies and disasters, the response to the COVID-19 pandemic likely increased risk among the EMS workforce. Methods: EMS agencies in the State of Texas were stratified according to agency structure, eg, fire-based, nonfire-based governmental, hospital-based private, nonhospital-based private, and other. A systematic sample of 10 agencies was selected from each of the five strata. An interview guide was developed to collect information about prior experience with disaster or emergency response, professional roles since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, and alternations to professional roles and EMS systems during both prior responses and the COVID-19 response. Interviews were transcribed and inductively coded to identify themes. Results: Five themes were identified in qualitative interviews. These included 1) early pandemic lessons, 2) protocol changes, 3) personal stressors, 4) professional stressors, and 5) lessons learned. Increased workloads, operational changes, fear of transmission to friends and family, and fatigue from working conditions were emphasized by participants. However, adaptations are being identified that could help EMS agencies and their workforces maintain resilience, even during an ongoing emergency response. Discussion: The COVID-19 response created unique professional and personal stressors to the EMS workforce and limited access to coping mechanisms previously used to reduce stress. Targeted studies are needed to guide the implementation of evidence-based interventions to protect the well-being of EMS personnel now and during future public health emergency and disaster responses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行应对对紧急医疗服务人员的影响,德克萨斯州,美国
简介:对2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)应对措施对医护人员身心健康的影响进行了广泛研究;对院前急救医疗服务(EMS)工作人员的具体影响知之甚少。然而,鉴于有关参与先前紧急情况和灾难的EMS员工的身体和心理影响的数据,应对新冠肺炎大流行可能会增加EMS员工的风险。方法:根据机构结构对德克萨斯州的EMS机构进行分层,例如,以火灾为基础的政府机构、以非消防为基础的私人机构、以医院为基础的私营机构、非医疗为基础的私立机构和其他机构。从五个阶层中的每一个阶层中选择了10个机构的系统样本。制定了一份访谈指南,以收集有关灾害或应急响应的先前经验、自新冠肺炎大流行开始以来的专业角色,以及先前响应和新冠肺炎响应期间专业角色和EMS系统的变化的信息。访谈被转录并归纳编码,以确定主题。结果:在定性访谈中确定了五个主题。其中包括1)早期疫情教训,2)协议变更,3)个人压力源,4)职业压力源,以及5)经验教训。与会者强调了工作量增加、操作变化、对传播给朋友和家人的恐惧以及工作条件带来的疲劳。然而,正在确定可以帮助EMS机构及其员工保持韧性的适应措施,即使在持续的应急响应中也是如此。讨论:新冠肺炎应对措施为EMS员工带来了独特的职业和个人压力源,并限制了他们使用以前用于减轻压力的应对机制。需要有针对性的研究来指导循证干预措施的实施,以保护EMS人员现在和未来公共卫生紧急情况和灾害应对期间的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
Areas in conflict and emergency response: Navigating complex challenges. Capturing human response to Winter Storm Frankie based on X (formerly known as Twitter) data. Evaluation and comparison of hospital preparedness levels against mass-casualty disasters and the COVID-19 pandemic. Skills for Psychological Recovery train-the-trainer program: For care providers of children with special healthcare needs and disabilities during COVID-19 recovery. Social media and disaster management by the National Emergency Management in Nigeria: What it is and what it should be.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1