Modern Barbarism: Causes and Consequences

A. Malashenko, Y. Nisnevich, A. Ryabov
{"title":"Modern Barbarism: Causes and Consequences","authors":"A. Malashenko, Y. Nisnevich, A. Ryabov","doi":"10.1080/10611428.2021.1911529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article is dedicated to analysis of the phenomenon typically referred to as “barbarism,” which remains in social and political practice to this day. The authors focus on so-called “vertical barbarism.” Unlike the “horizontal” barbarism known since antiquity, this type of barbarism relates not to a direct clash of peoples, but to complex social processes, in particular to powerful vertical mobility and a massive increase in opportunities for broad segments of population to gain access to achievements of civilization. The authors believe that the birth of vertical barbarism relates to the phenomenon described by the Spanish philosopher Ortega y Gasset as “the revolt of the masses.” This was one of the most significant social and cultural shifts in human history, when the development of democracy and industrial technology gave rise to a new kind of social space that brought the “mass man” to the forefront of social and political life. As a result of the revolt of the masses, during the first half of the 20th century, a wave of vertical barbarism swept across Europe, leading to the establishment of fascist, Nazi, and right-wing authoritarian regimes in a series of European countries. After the end of World War II, this first wave of vertical barbarism receded in favor of the formation of consumer society, in which the mass man turned from an aggressive political subject into its relatively passive object. The authors interpret the political engagement of the mass man in recent years as a new wave of vertical barbarism. They believe that behind this wave lie the fear and frustration of a mass man who has failed to adapt to the sharp expansion of his living space, and the qualitative transformation of the social sphere caused by the late 19th–early 20th century development of democracy and technological revolution. This situation is aggravated by a lack of appropriate attention to these shifts by the political structures and powers that be, which leads to a sense of abandonment that motivates the mass man to revolt against the established order and challenge modern civilization.","PeriodicalId":85479,"journal":{"name":"Russian social science review : a journal of translations","volume":"62 1","pages":"115 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611428.2021.1911529","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian social science review : a journal of translations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611428.2021.1911529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The article is dedicated to analysis of the phenomenon typically referred to as “barbarism,” which remains in social and political practice to this day. The authors focus on so-called “vertical barbarism.” Unlike the “horizontal” barbarism known since antiquity, this type of barbarism relates not to a direct clash of peoples, but to complex social processes, in particular to powerful vertical mobility and a massive increase in opportunities for broad segments of population to gain access to achievements of civilization. The authors believe that the birth of vertical barbarism relates to the phenomenon described by the Spanish philosopher Ortega y Gasset as “the revolt of the masses.” This was one of the most significant social and cultural shifts in human history, when the development of democracy and industrial technology gave rise to a new kind of social space that brought the “mass man” to the forefront of social and political life. As a result of the revolt of the masses, during the first half of the 20th century, a wave of vertical barbarism swept across Europe, leading to the establishment of fascist, Nazi, and right-wing authoritarian regimes in a series of European countries. After the end of World War II, this first wave of vertical barbarism receded in favor of the formation of consumer society, in which the mass man turned from an aggressive political subject into its relatively passive object. The authors interpret the political engagement of the mass man in recent years as a new wave of vertical barbarism. They believe that behind this wave lie the fear and frustration of a mass man who has failed to adapt to the sharp expansion of his living space, and the qualitative transformation of the social sphere caused by the late 19th–early 20th century development of democracy and technological revolution. This situation is aggravated by a lack of appropriate attention to these shifts by the political structures and powers that be, which leads to a sense of abandonment that motivates the mass man to revolt against the established order and challenge modern civilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代野蛮主义:原因与后果
摘要本文致力于分析“野蛮”现象,这种现象至今仍存在于社会和政治实践中。作者关注所谓的“纵向野蛮”。与自古以来已知的“横向”野蛮不同,这种野蛮与民族之间的直接冲突无关,而是与复杂的社会进程有关,特别是与强大的纵向流动和广大人口获得文明成就的机会的大幅增加有关。作者认为,垂直野蛮的诞生与西班牙哲学家奥尔特加·加塞特所描述的“群众的反抗”现象有关。这是人类历史上最重要的社会和文化转变之一,当民主和工业技术的发展产生了一种新的社会空间,将“大众人”带到了社会和政治生活的前沿。由于群众的反抗,在20世纪上半叶,一股垂直的野蛮浪潮席卷了整个欧洲,导致在一系列欧洲国家建立了法西斯、纳粹和右翼威权政权。第二次世界大战结束后,这种垂直野蛮的第一波浪潮消退,有利于消费社会的形成,在消费社会中,大众从一个咄咄逼人的政治主体变成了相对被动的对象。作者将近年来群众的政治参与解释为新的垂直野蛮浪潮。他们认为,在这股浪潮的背后,隐藏着一个大众的恐惧和沮丧,他未能适应生活空间的急剧扩张,以及19世纪末20世纪初民主和技术革命的发展所导致的社会领域的质的转变。由于政治结构和权力对这些转变缺乏适当的关注,这种情况更加恶化,这导致了一种被抛弃的感觉,促使大众反抗既定秩序,挑战现代文明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Consequences of Changes in Russia’s Age Distribution During Demographic Waves The Population Replacement of Russia: Objectives, Trends, Factors, and Possible Outcomes by 2024 The Russian Intelligentsia and Russia’s Social Institutions: Trust or Alienation In This Issue: Existential Dilemmas What Is the State of Russian Society After 20 Years of Putin?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1