The Cold War Origins of the “Crisis of Democracy”

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.3167/DT.2018.050104
Kyong-Min Son
{"title":"The Cold War Origins of the “Crisis of Democracy”","authors":"Kyong-Min Son","doi":"10.3167/DT.2018.050104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article suggests that a “crisis of democracy” can be understood\nnot simply as a deterioration of specific representative institutions\nbut as a repositioning of democratic politics vis-à-vis other principles of social\ncoordination, most notably the capitalist market, and the attendant decline\nof democratic subjectivity—people’s attunement to claims appealing\nto the common good. I trace this process to the post–World War II era. I\nshow that the crisis of democracy was shaped by the substantive imperative\nof fusing democracy with free-market capitalism. Many postwar democratic\ntheorists believed that the welfare state could manage the tension latent in\nthis fusion. But an analysis of Friedrich Hayek’s theory of neoliberal democracy,\nwhich recognizes that tension more acutely, reveals that the incorporation\nof free-market capitalism creates tendencies that undermine democracy\nfrom within.","PeriodicalId":42255,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/DT.2018.050104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/DT.2018.050104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article suggests that a “crisis of democracy” can be understood not simply as a deterioration of specific representative institutions but as a repositioning of democratic politics vis-à-vis other principles of social coordination, most notably the capitalist market, and the attendant decline of democratic subjectivity—people’s attunement to claims appealing to the common good. I trace this process to the post–World War II era. I show that the crisis of democracy was shaped by the substantive imperative of fusing democracy with free-market capitalism. Many postwar democratic theorists believed that the welfare state could manage the tension latent in this fusion. But an analysis of Friedrich Hayek’s theory of neoliberal democracy, which recognizes that tension more acutely, reveals that the incorporation of free-market capitalism creates tendencies that undermine democracy from within.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“民主危机”的冷战根源
本文认为,“民主危机”不仅可以理解为具体代议制的恶化,而且可以理解为民主政治相对于-à-vis其他社会协调原则的重新定位,最明显的是资本主义市场,以及随之而来的民主主体性的衰落——人们对呼吁共同利益的诉求的协调。我把这个过程追溯到二战后的时代。民主危机是由将民主与自由市场资本主义融合在一起的实质要求造成的。许多战后民主理论家认为,福利国家可以控制这种融合中潜在的紧张关系。但是,对弗里德里希·哈耶克的新自由主义民主理论的分析表明,自由市场资本主义的结合产生了从内部破坏民主的趋势。哈耶克的新自由主义民主理论更敏锐地认识到这种紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Democratic Theory is a peer-reviewed journal published and distributed by Berghahn. It encourages philosophical and interdisciplinary contributions that critically explore democratic theory—in all its forms. Spanning a range of views, the journal offers a cross-disciplinary forum for diverse theoretical questions to be put forward and systematically examined. It advances non-Western as well as Western ideas and is actively based on the premise that there are many forms of democracies and many types of democrats. As a forum for debate, the journal challenges theorists to ask and answer the perennial questions that plague the field of democratization studies: Why is democracy so prominent in the world today? What is the meaning of democracy? Will democracy continue to expand? Are current forms of democracy sufficient to give voice to “the people” in an increasingly fragmented and divided world? Who leads in democracy? What types of non-Western democratic theories are there? Should democrats always defend democracy? Should democrats be fearful of de-democratization, post-democracies, and the rise of hybridized regimes?
期刊最新文献
Chinese Contemplations on Utopian and Dystopian Democratic Governance Socialist Democracy Conceptualizing Difference West By Not West Democracies Across Cultures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1