"An analogue study examining Attitude Change Theory and its implications for dissemination and implementation of empirically supported treatments"

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.24193/JEBP.2018.2.15
L. D. Seligman, Andrew L. Geers, Erin F. Swedish, Joseph D Hovey, Gabriela Hurtado
{"title":"\"An analogue study examining Attitude Change Theory and its implications for dissemination and implementation of empirically supported treatments\"","authors":"L. D. Seligman, Andrew L. Geers, Erin F. Swedish, Joseph D Hovey, Gabriela Hurtado","doi":"10.24193/JEBP.2018.2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the promise of research-based treatments, dissemination into community settings has been problematic. Attitudes toward these treatments may be partially responsible for the slow uptake. Building on the functional theory of attitudes, it was hypothesized that presenting emotion-focused rather than cognitively-focused information about a treatment would produce more positive attitudes toward the treatment in individuals interested in clinical practice. To test this hypothesis, 144 students (116 women; M age = 22.46 years) completed a measure of vocational interest and evaluated a treatment after reading either an emotional or cognitive passage about the treatment. Consistent with the hypothesis, participants’ interests in clinical activities were related to more favorable reactions to the emotional passage but not the cognitive passage. This effect was partially mediated by message elaboration. Findings suggest that presenting clinicians with emotionally rich information on treatment options may help bridge the gap between research and practice. compared to a no passages were matched approximate reading and","PeriodicalId":43042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/JEBP.2018.2.15","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the promise of research-based treatments, dissemination into community settings has been problematic. Attitudes toward these treatments may be partially responsible for the slow uptake. Building on the functional theory of attitudes, it was hypothesized that presenting emotion-focused rather than cognitively-focused information about a treatment would produce more positive attitudes toward the treatment in individuals interested in clinical practice. To test this hypothesis, 144 students (116 women; M age = 22.46 years) completed a measure of vocational interest and evaluated a treatment after reading either an emotional or cognitive passage about the treatment. Consistent with the hypothesis, participants’ interests in clinical activities were related to more favorable reactions to the emotional passage but not the cognitive passage. This effect was partially mediated by message elaboration. Findings suggest that presenting clinicians with emotionally rich information on treatment options may help bridge the gap between research and practice. compared to a no passages were matched approximate reading and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一项检验态度改变理论及其对经验支持治疗的传播和实施的影响的模拟研究”
尽管基于研究的治疗有希望,但在社区环境中的传播一直存在问题。对这些治疗方法的态度可能是缓慢吸收的部分原因。建立在态度功能理论的基础上,假设呈现以情绪为中心而不是以认知为中心的治疗信息会使对临床实践感兴趣的个体对治疗产生更积极的态度。为了验证这一假设,144名学生(116名女性;(年龄= 22.46岁)完成了一项职业兴趣测量,并在阅读了关于治疗的情感或认知文章后对治疗进行了评估。与假设一致,参与者对临床活动的兴趣与对情绪通道的更有利反应有关,而与认知通道无关。该效应部分由信息细化介导。研究结果表明,向临床医生提供有关治疗方案的丰富情感信息可能有助于弥合研究与实践之间的差距。与a相比,没有文章匹配近似阅读和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal is devoted to the advancement of the clinical theory and practice of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBP) (e.g., evidence-based psychological assessments, evidence-based psychological treatments). The journal publishes original papers dealing with EBP and psychology, psychiatry, the medical and mental specialties, and allied areas of science.
期刊最新文献
Social Anxiety from an Attachment Theory Perspective: The Mediating Role of Early Maladaptive Schema Domains and Rejection Sensitivity Mental health literacy: A Survey of the Public’s Ability to Recognize Mental Disorders and Their Knowledge about the Effectiveness of Helpful Interventions to Help the Victims The Longitudinal Mediating Effect of Distress Tolerance in a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial Mindfulness and Self-compassion Decrease Emotional Symptoms, Self-criticism, Rumination and Worry in College Students: A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Group Self-compassion-based Interventions Effect of Training on Beliefs About Exposure Therapy in Experienced Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1