Analysis on early clinical features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Guan-jun Li, Jun Xu, Gang Mei, Ling Yue, Jing-hua Wang, Huafang Li
{"title":"Analysis on early clinical features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia","authors":"Guan-jun Li, Jun Xu, Gang Mei, Ling Yue, Jing-hua Wang, Huafang Li","doi":"10.3969/CJCNN.V17I11.1692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Although the early behavioral symptoms of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are prominent, early diagnosis for bvFTD is difficult due to confusion with other mental disorders, and lack of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic criteria, etc. In this paper, we summarized the important reviews in recent years and analyzed the clinical characteristics of bvFTD patients to improve the detection of early symptoms in bvFTD.  Methods Twenty-three possible or probable bvFTD patients were diagnosed according to International Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Criteria Consortium (FTDC). Self-designed questionnaires designed by Shanghai Mental Health Center were used to collect sociodemographic data and general information of patients. Their clinical characteristics were summarized, including abnormal behaviors, cognitive impairment, psychotic symptoms and other symptoms. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) were used to make neuropsychological tests and compare with similar overseas studies (control group, N = 66).  Results Eleven male patients and 12 female patients were included in our study. Compared with control group, the average age of onset [(50.83 ± 11.55) years vs. (57.00 ± 10.00) years; t = 3.863, P = 0.000] and average age of diagnosis [(53.22 ± 11.55) years vs. (61.00 ± 9.00) years;  t = 13.423,  P = 0.000] of bvFTD patients were smaller. The study showed that bvFTD patients had more apathy or indolence [95.65% (22/23) vs. 65.15% (43/66); χ 2 = 8.057,  P = 0.005], loss of sympathy or empathy [95.65% (22/23) vs. 33.33% (22/66); χ 2 = 26.499,  P = 0.000], while patients in control group showed more derepression behavior [98.48% (65/66) vs. 52.17% (12/23); χ 2 = 27.514,  P = 0.000] and continuous, stiff, obsessive and/or ritualized behavior [95.45% (63/66) vs. 30.43% (7/23); adjusted χ 2 = 39.159,  P = 0.000]. For cognitive impairment, bvFTD patients presented apraxia [69.56% (16/23) vs. 22.73% (15/66); χ 2 = 16.484,  P = 0.000] and executive dysfunction [82.61% (19/23) vs. 59.09% (39/66); χ 2 = 4.156,  P = 0.041]. In psychotic symptoms, patients in control group showed hallucination and delusion [33.33% (22/66) vs. 4.35% (1/23); χ 2 = 7.477,  P = 0.006].  Conclusions While the behavioral symptoms of bvFTD patients are varied, memory disorder can be one of the primal symptoms. Compared with similar foreign studies, the different composition of behavior symptoms of our bvFTD patients may be caused by cultural differences among evaluators in the understanding of some clinical symptoms in patients. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2017.11.010","PeriodicalId":10113,"journal":{"name":"中国现代神经疾病杂志","volume":"17 1","pages":"834-839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国现代神经疾病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/CJCNN.V17I11.1692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Although the early behavioral symptoms of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are prominent, early diagnosis for bvFTD is difficult due to confusion with other mental disorders, and lack of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic criteria, etc. In this paper, we summarized the important reviews in recent years and analyzed the clinical characteristics of bvFTD patients to improve the detection of early symptoms in bvFTD.  Methods Twenty-three possible or probable bvFTD patients were diagnosed according to International Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Criteria Consortium (FTDC). Self-designed questionnaires designed by Shanghai Mental Health Center were used to collect sociodemographic data and general information of patients. Their clinical characteristics were summarized, including abnormal behaviors, cognitive impairment, psychotic symptoms and other symptoms. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) were used to make neuropsychological tests and compare with similar overseas studies (control group, N = 66).  Results Eleven male patients and 12 female patients were included in our study. Compared with control group, the average age of onset [(50.83 ± 11.55) years vs. (57.00 ± 10.00) years; t = 3.863, P = 0.000] and average age of diagnosis [(53.22 ± 11.55) years vs. (61.00 ± 9.00) years;  t = 13.423,  P = 0.000] of bvFTD patients were smaller. The study showed that bvFTD patients had more apathy or indolence [95.65% (22/23) vs. 65.15% (43/66); χ 2 = 8.057,  P = 0.005], loss of sympathy or empathy [95.65% (22/23) vs. 33.33% (22/66); χ 2 = 26.499,  P = 0.000], while patients in control group showed more derepression behavior [98.48% (65/66) vs. 52.17% (12/23); χ 2 = 27.514,  P = 0.000] and continuous, stiff, obsessive and/or ritualized behavior [95.45% (63/66) vs. 30.43% (7/23); adjusted χ 2 = 39.159,  P = 0.000]. For cognitive impairment, bvFTD patients presented apraxia [69.56% (16/23) vs. 22.73% (15/66); χ 2 = 16.484,  P = 0.000] and executive dysfunction [82.61% (19/23) vs. 59.09% (39/66); χ 2 = 4.156,  P = 0.041]. In psychotic symptoms, patients in control group showed hallucination and delusion [33.33% (22/66) vs. 4.35% (1/23); χ 2 = 7.477,  P = 0.006].  Conclusions While the behavioral symptoms of bvFTD patients are varied, memory disorder can be one of the primal symptoms. Compared with similar foreign studies, the different composition of behavior symptoms of our bvFTD patients may be caused by cultural differences among evaluators in the understanding of some clinical symptoms in patients. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2017.11.010
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为变异性额颞叶痴呆的早期临床特征分析
背景尽管行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)的早期行为症状突出,但由于与其他精神障碍混淆,诊断标准缺乏敏感性和特异性等原因,bvFTD的早期诊断很困难,我们总结了近年来的重要综述,并分析了bvFTD患者的临床特征,以提高对bvFTD早期症状的检测。方法根据国际行为变异性额颞叶痴呆标准联合会(FTDC)对23例可能或可能的bvFTD患者进行诊断。采用上海市精神卫生中心自行设计的调查表,收集患者的社会人口学资料和一般信息。总结其临床特点,包括行为异常、认知障碍、精神病症状等。采用简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、日常生活能力(ADL)和临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)进行神经心理测试,并与国外类似研究进行比较(对照组,N=66)。结果11例男性患者和12例女性患者被纳入本研究。与对照组相比,bvFTD患者的平均发病年龄[(50.83±11.55)岁对(57.00±10.00)岁;t=3.863,P=0.000]和平均诊断年龄[(53.22±11.5 5)年对(61.00±9.00)年;t=13.423,P=0.0000]较小。研究表明,bvFTD患者表现出更多的冷漠或懒惰[95.65%(22/23)vs.65.15%(43/66);χ2=8.057,P=0.005],失去同情或同理心[95.65%,22/23)vs 33.33%(22/66),强迫和/或仪式化行为[95.45%(63/66)vs.30.43%(7/23);校正后的χ2=39.159,P=0.000]。对于认知障碍,bvFTD患者表现为失用症[69.56%(16/23)vs.22.73%(15/66);χ2=16.484,P=0.0000]和执行功能障碍[82.61%(19/23)vs.59.09%(39/66);χ0=4.156,P=0.041]。在精神病症状中,对照组患者出现幻觉和妄想[33.33%(22/66)vs.4.35%(1/23);χ2=7.477,P=0.006]。与国外类似研究相比,我们bvFTD患者行为症状组成的不同可能是由于评估者对患者某些临床症状的理解存在文化差异所致。DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731017.11.010
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国现代神经疾病杂志
中国现代神经疾病杂志 Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4914
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Analysis of related factors for restless legs syndrome in hemodialysis patients The role of butyrylcholinesterase in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease Risk factors for in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery origin after stent implantation: a Meta-analysis Interpretation of "Chinese classification of cerebrovascular diseases (2015)" Analysis on risk factors for post-stroke emotional incontinence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1