Study of positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound

Yuanji Zhang, Tao Liu, Zimo Wang, Qi-qi Hua, Rong Guo, Xiaoqing Chen, Shourong Hu, Yumei He, Mei Li, Xiong Yi
{"title":"Study of positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound","authors":"Yuanji Zhang, Tao Liu, Zimo Wang, Qi-qi Hua, Rong Guo, Xiaoqing Chen, Shourong Hu, Yumei He, Mei Li, Xiong Yi","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN131148-20190916-00566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the imaging rate and diagnostic rate of positioning the fetal conus medullaris by three-dimensional ultrasound method to detect atlantoaxial intervertebral space, comparing it with the traditional two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound methods. \n \n \nMethods \nConsecutively 318 singleton fetuses received routine ultrasound screening during the second trimester were enrolled from November 2017 to December 2018 in Shenzhen Luohu People′s Hospital and Shenzhen People′s Hospital. These fetuses included 276 normal cases and 42 abnormal cases. The abnormal group contained 11 cases tethered cords fetuses(tethered cords group) and 31 cases non-tethered fetuses(non-tethered group). A new ultrasound method named detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound and traditional two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound methods were used to acquire and store the images. The positions of the fetal conus medullaris were analyzed blindly and recorded by three experienced physicians using three different methods with off-line software. \n \n \nResults \n①The χ2 test comparing multiple sample rates was used to compare the imaging acquisition success rate of fetal conus medullaris by three ultrasound methods. The test level was adjusted to be α′=0.05/4=0.0125, the results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the three methods in the normal group (χ2=7.39, P=0.025) and the abnormal group (χ2=5.32, P=0.070). ②The χ2 test comparing multiple sample rates was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fetal conus medullaris position in normal group by three methods, it showed there was no significant difference in the correct rate of conus medullaris position in the normal group (χ2=2.52, P=0.284). ③The χ2 test comparing multiple sample rates was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the fetal conus medullaris in tethered cord group and non-tethered group using 3 methods, the difference was not statistically significant in tethered cord group (χ2=1.22, P=0.543), while the difference was statistically significant in non-tethered group(χ2=9.69, P=0.008). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe method of detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound has a high imaging rate and diagnostic accuracy in positioning the fetal conus medullaris. Positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound is better than traditional two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the abnormal non-tethered fetuses, which can provide more valuable information for prenatal diagnosis consultation and prenatal and postnatal care. \n \n \nKey words: \nUltrasonography; Atlanto-axial intervertebral space; Fetal conus medullaris; Tethered cord","PeriodicalId":10224,"journal":{"name":"中华超声影像学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华超声影像学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN131148-20190916-00566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the imaging rate and diagnostic rate of positioning the fetal conus medullaris by three-dimensional ultrasound method to detect atlantoaxial intervertebral space, comparing it with the traditional two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound methods. Methods Consecutively 318 singleton fetuses received routine ultrasound screening during the second trimester were enrolled from November 2017 to December 2018 in Shenzhen Luohu People′s Hospital and Shenzhen People′s Hospital. These fetuses included 276 normal cases and 42 abnormal cases. The abnormal group contained 11 cases tethered cords fetuses(tethered cords group) and 31 cases non-tethered fetuses(non-tethered group). A new ultrasound method named detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound and traditional two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound methods were used to acquire and store the images. The positions of the fetal conus medullaris were analyzed blindly and recorded by three experienced physicians using three different methods with off-line software. Results ①The χ2 test comparing multiple sample rates was used to compare the imaging acquisition success rate of fetal conus medullaris by three ultrasound methods. The test level was adjusted to be α′=0.05/4=0.0125, the results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the three methods in the normal group (χ2=7.39, P=0.025) and the abnormal group (χ2=5.32, P=0.070). ②The χ2 test comparing multiple sample rates was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fetal conus medullaris position in normal group by three methods, it showed there was no significant difference in the correct rate of conus medullaris position in the normal group (χ2=2.52, P=0.284). ③The χ2 test comparing multiple sample rates was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the fetal conus medullaris in tethered cord group and non-tethered group using 3 methods, the difference was not statistically significant in tethered cord group (χ2=1.22, P=0.543), while the difference was statistically significant in non-tethered group(χ2=9.69, P=0.008). Conclusions The method of detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound has a high imaging rate and diagnostic accuracy in positioning the fetal conus medullaris. Positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound is better than traditional two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the abnormal non-tethered fetuses, which can provide more valuable information for prenatal diagnosis consultation and prenatal and postnatal care. Key words: Ultrasonography; Atlanto-axial intervertebral space; Fetal conus medullaris; Tethered cord
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三维超声检测寰枢椎间隙定位胎儿髓圆锥的研究
目的探讨三维超声定位胎儿脊髓圆锥检测寰枢椎间隙的成像率和诊断率,并与传统的二维和三维超声方法进行比较。方法2017年11月至2018年12月,在深圳市罗湖人民医院和深圳市人民医院连续318例孕中期单胎接受常规超声筛查。这些胎儿包括276例正常病例和42例异常病例。异常组包括11例栓系脐带胎儿(栓系脐带组)和31例非栓系胎儿(非栓系组)。采用三维超声检测寰枢椎间隙的新方法和传统的二维、三维超声方法对图像进行采集和存储。三位经验丰富的医生使用三种不同的方法和离线软件对胎儿脊髓圆锥的位置进行了盲分析和记录。结果①应用χ2检验比较三种超声方法对胎儿脊髓圆锥的影像学获取成功率。α′=0.05/4=0.0125,结果表明,三种方法在正常组(χ2=7.39,P=0.025)和异常组(χ2\5.32,P=0.070)之间无统计学差异,结果表明正常组胎儿脊髓圆锥位置的正确率无显著性差异(χ2=2.52,P=0.284),脊髓栓系组差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.22,P=0.543),而非栓系组则有统计学意义(τ2=9.69,P=0.008)。三维超声检测寰枢椎间隙定位胎儿脊髓圆锥优于传统的二维和三维超声定位异常非栓系胎儿,可为产前诊断咨询和产前产后护理提供更有价值的信息。关键词:超声检查;寰枢椎间隙;胎儿脊髓圆锥;系绳
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华超声影像学杂志
中华超声影像学杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9126
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided pathological sampling of cadaver lung tissue in cases of COVID-19 Ultrasound-guided post-mortem tissue sampling in the autopsy of COVID-19 cases: a pilot study The clinical value of ultrasound in the assessment of the severity of COVID-19 Study of positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound Prenatal ultrasound diagnostic clues of congenital dislocation of the knee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1