Voting-based Approach in Consensus Clustering through q-fold cross-validation

IF 0.6 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis Pub Date : 2019-11-20 DOI:10.1285/I20705948V12N3P657
Norin Rahayu Shamsuddin, N. Mahat
{"title":"Voting-based Approach in Consensus Clustering through q-fold cross-validation","authors":"Norin Rahayu Shamsuddin, N. Mahat","doi":"10.1285/I20705948V12N3P657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past 50 years, extensive research have been carried out to understand how clustering work in classifying data into meaningful groups. Various clustering algorithms and cluster validity indexes have been proposedand improvised to obtain the best clustering result. However, there is noclustering method that is able to give consistent results on similar structureof a dataset. An alternative mechanism to control the variation of resultsand improved the quality of traditional clustering is through consensus clustering. In this paper, we generate multiple partitions of consensus clusteringthrough a resampling method by employing q-fold cross-validation approach.q-fold cross-validation approach is able to speed-up the consensus partitionsprocedure with qth iterations. To encounter with different number of cluster labels occur in the partitions, we employed voting-based method in the second stage of consensus clustering to obtain optimal consensus partition.The performance of optimal consensus partitions is evaluated from Silhouetteplot","PeriodicalId":44770,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V12N3P657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, extensive research have been carried out to understand how clustering work in classifying data into meaningful groups. Various clustering algorithms and cluster validity indexes have been proposedand improvised to obtain the best clustering result. However, there is noclustering method that is able to give consistent results on similar structureof a dataset. An alternative mechanism to control the variation of resultsand improved the quality of traditional clustering is through consensus clustering. In this paper, we generate multiple partitions of consensus clusteringthrough a resampling method by employing q-fold cross-validation approach.q-fold cross-validation approach is able to speed-up the consensus partitionsprocedure with qth iterations. To encounter with different number of cluster labels occur in the partitions, we employed voting-based method in the second stage of consensus clustering to obtain optimal consensus partition.The performance of optimal consensus partitions is evaluated from Silhouetteplot
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于投票的q-fold交叉验证共识聚类方法
在过去的50年里,已经进行了广泛的研究,以了解聚类如何将数据分类为有意义的组。为了获得最佳聚类结果,人们提出并改进了各种聚类算法和聚类有效性指标。然而,没有一种聚类方法能够在数据集的相似结构上给出一致的结果。另一种控制结果变化和提高传统聚类质量的机制是通过共识聚类。本文采用q-fold交叉验证方法,通过重采样方法生成共识聚类的多个分区。q倍交叉验证方法能够通过QTH迭代加速共识划分过程。针对分区中出现不同数量的聚类标签的情况,我们在共识聚类的第二阶段采用基于投票的方法来获得最优共识分区。通过剪影图对最优共识分区的性能进行了评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Data Analysis of Accuracy of US Weather Forecastes Extended asymmetry model based on logit transformation and decomposition of symmetry for square contingency tables with ordered categories Generalized Quasi Lindley Distribution: Theoretical Properties, Estimation Methods, and Applications Almost unbiased ridge estimator in the count data regression models Does the elimination of work flexibility contribute to reducing wage inequality? Empirical evidence from Ecuador
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1