Knowledge, Truth, and Education in Post-Normal Times

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ethics and Education Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/17449642.2022.2148382
Kai Horsthemke
{"title":"Knowledge, Truth, and Education in Post-Normal Times","authors":"Kai Horsthemke","doi":"10.1080/17449642.2022.2148382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The advent of Covid-19, a new and highly contagious form of Corona virus, in late 2019 cast a harsh light on human vulnerabilities and on the provocations (and opportunities) facing humanity. Although many of the more drastic measures applied within educational settings have since ceased to apply, at least for the time being, we are not yet ‘past Covid’: many of the challenges that are discussed here still exist. As we faced unprecedented disruption to economies, societies and education systems, the global health pandemic drew attention to existing inequalities and presented a clear picture of steps required for addressing the education of close to one billion students whose learning was hampered due to school closures. The magnitude of this challenge was and still is starkly manifest with the digital divide on the African continen. Democratization of education has been perceived to include facilitation of both formal and epistemic access (including allocation of new technologies for teaching and learning), reconceptualization of knowledge, truth and learning, recognition of ‘other standpoints for knowledge’ and ‘very different knowledge registers,’ recovery of ‘lost knowledge resources’ and connection of ‘multiple ways of knowing,’ and respectful engagement ‘with indigenous and local knowledges,’ idea that merit critical interrogation.","PeriodicalId":45613,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Education","volume":"17 1","pages":"373 - 387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2022.2148382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The advent of Covid-19, a new and highly contagious form of Corona virus, in late 2019 cast a harsh light on human vulnerabilities and on the provocations (and opportunities) facing humanity. Although many of the more drastic measures applied within educational settings have since ceased to apply, at least for the time being, we are not yet ‘past Covid’: many of the challenges that are discussed here still exist. As we faced unprecedented disruption to economies, societies and education systems, the global health pandemic drew attention to existing inequalities and presented a clear picture of steps required for addressing the education of close to one billion students whose learning was hampered due to school closures. The magnitude of this challenge was and still is starkly manifest with the digital divide on the African continen. Democratization of education has been perceived to include facilitation of both formal and epistemic access (including allocation of new technologies for teaching and learning), reconceptualization of knowledge, truth and learning, recognition of ‘other standpoints for knowledge’ and ‘very different knowledge registers,’ recovery of ‘lost knowledge resources’ and connection of ‘multiple ways of knowing,’ and respectful engagement ‘with indigenous and local knowledges,’ idea that merit critical interrogation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后师范时代的知识、真理与教育
摘要新冠肺炎是一种新的高度传染性冠状病毒,于2019年末出现,这让人们对人类的脆弱性和人类面临的挑衅(和机遇)产生了强烈的认识。尽管许多在教育环境中实施的更严厉的措施已经停止适用,至少目前是这样,但我们还没有“度过新冠肺炎”:这里讨论的许多挑战仍然存在。在我们面临经济、社会和教育系统前所未有的破坏之际,全球卫生疫情引起了人们对现有不平等现象的关注,并清楚地表明了解决近10亿学生教育问题所需的步骤,这些学生的学习因学校关闭而受阻。非洲大陆的数字鸿沟过去和现在都清楚地表明了这一挑战的严重性。教育民主化被认为包括促进正式和认识的获取(包括分配用于教学的新技术),重新定义知识、真理和学习的概念,承认“知识的其他观点”和“非常不同的知识登记册”,“恢复‘丢失的知识资源’和‘多种了解方式’的联系,以及尊重‘土著和地方知识’,这一想法值得批判性审问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics and Education
Ethics and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Situated knowledge between purposes and facts and its relation to pedagogical tact Transforming relationships. Pedagogical tact as a utopian figure of mediation Tactlessness as condition for teaching tact: educational reflections based on Adorno Theorising education from within pedagogical tact: a matter of singularity, attunement, and rules-as-not-rules Parents as psychological coaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1