Public support for decarbonisation policies: Between self-interest and social need for alleviating energy and transport poverty in the United Kingdom

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy and climate change Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100099
Paul Upham , Neil Simcock , Benjamin Sovacool , Gerardo A. Torres Contreras , Kirsten Jenkins , Mari Martiskainen
{"title":"Public support for decarbonisation policies: Between self-interest and social need for alleviating energy and transport poverty in the United Kingdom","authors":"Paul Upham ,&nbsp;Neil Simcock ,&nbsp;Benjamin Sovacool ,&nbsp;Gerardo A. Torres Contreras ,&nbsp;Kirsten Jenkins ,&nbsp;Mari Martiskainen","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Policies for transitions to decarbonised energy and transport systems have implications for social welfare. Here we firstly investigate, via focus groups, public support for policies that have implications for energy and transport poverty in a country with a sizeable incidence of both, the United Kingdom (UK). We then examine which of the publics’ policy preferences concur with those of a wider group of expert stakeholders (n = 47), observing concurrence in the top choices of both for: (i) better public transport; mandating improved energy efficiency in (ii) rental housing and (iii) new homes; and (iv) expanding an income supplement scheme (such as the Warm Home Discount). While the public are relatively supportive of policy for electric vehicles, expert stakeholders see the shift to convergent electrification and digitalisation in domestic contexts as carrying risks for lower income households and those less digitally literate. We highlight that many of the public questioned view themselves as likely to be worthy of assistance, given the level of price inflation in the UK. We conclude that decarbonisation policies require careful attention not only to infrastructure, but to social welfare policy if they are to carry public support.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100099"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278723000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Policies for transitions to decarbonised energy and transport systems have implications for social welfare. Here we firstly investigate, via focus groups, public support for policies that have implications for energy and transport poverty in a country with a sizeable incidence of both, the United Kingdom (UK). We then examine which of the publics’ policy preferences concur with those of a wider group of expert stakeholders (n = 47), observing concurrence in the top choices of both for: (i) better public transport; mandating improved energy efficiency in (ii) rental housing and (iii) new homes; and (iv) expanding an income supplement scheme (such as the Warm Home Discount). While the public are relatively supportive of policy for electric vehicles, expert stakeholders see the shift to convergent electrification and digitalisation in domestic contexts as carrying risks for lower income households and those less digitally literate. We highlight that many of the public questioned view themselves as likely to be worthy of assistance, given the level of price inflation in the UK. We conclude that decarbonisation policies require careful attention not only to infrastructure, but to social welfare policy if they are to carry public support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对脱碳政策的支持:在英国缓解能源和交通贫困的自身利益和社会需求之间
向脱碳能源和运输系统过渡的政策对社会福利有影响。在这里,我们首先通过焦点小组调查公众对影响能源和交通贫困的政策的支持,在一个能源和交通贫困发生率很高的国家,英国。然后,我们研究了哪些公众的政策偏好与更广泛的专家利益相关者群体的政策偏好相一致(n = 47),观察了两者在以下方面的首选的一致性:(i)更好的公共交通;要求在(ii)出租房屋和(iii)新房屋中提高能源效率;(iv)扩大收入补助计划(例如“温暖之家折扣”)。尽管公众相对支持电动汽车政策,但专家利益相关者认为,在国内环境下向电气化和数字化融合的转变,对低收入家庭和数字文化程度较低的家庭带来了风险。我们强调,考虑到英国的物价通胀水平,许多接受调查的公众认为自己可能值得得到帮助。我们的结论是,如果脱碳政策要获得公众的支持,不仅需要对基础设施予以密切关注,还需要对社会福利政策予以密切关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of decarbonisation challenges for the process industry in Sweden and Norway Green certificates for optimizing low-carbon hydrogen supply chain Cobalt-based molecular electrocatalyst-mediated green hydrogen generation: A potential pathway for decarbonising steel industry Advancing equitable value chains for the global hydrogen economy Health and air pollutant emission impacts of net zero CO2 by 2050 scenarios from the energy modeling forum 37 study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1