Reading Argumentative Texts: Effects of the Presence-Absence of Connectives in Reading Comprehension and Cognitive Effort

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Revista Costarricense de Psicologia Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.22544/rcps.v41i02.01
Hector Limón-Fernández, L. Sánchez-Loyo, Luis Alfredo Mayoral-Gutiérrez
{"title":"Reading Argumentative Texts: Effects of the Presence-Absence of Connectives in Reading Comprehension and Cognitive Effort","authors":"Hector Limón-Fernández, L. Sánchez-Loyo, Luis Alfredo Mayoral-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.22544/rcps.v41i02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies prove a strong association between reading and eye movements. Few investigations report the role of connectors and prior knowledge during reading in Spanish, as well as their association with eye movements. The present study aims to evaluate the effects of the presenceabsence of connectors in two argumentative texts on cognitive effort and reading comprehension.Forty-one psychology undergraduate students participated in a reading comprehension task, while their eye movements were recorded. The condition with connectors was related to prior knowledge, the slide time fixation, the slide number fixations, and the slide return fixations. The condition without connectors was related to the return fixations, the time fixation, and the number of fixations. Prior knowledge was correlated with the total time fixation, the total return fixations, and comprehension. This suggests that during reading without connectors more cognitive effort is required, observed in the return fixations; moreover, prior knowledge has an important role in the visual strategies required to process and obtain a representation of text. But participant performance was still good as observed in the scores of the reading comprehension task.","PeriodicalId":41141,"journal":{"name":"Revista Costarricense de Psicologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Costarricense de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22544/rcps.v41i02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies prove a strong association between reading and eye movements. Few investigations report the role of connectors and prior knowledge during reading in Spanish, as well as their association with eye movements. The present study aims to evaluate the effects of the presenceabsence of connectors in two argumentative texts on cognitive effort and reading comprehension.Forty-one psychology undergraduate students participated in a reading comprehension task, while their eye movements were recorded. The condition with connectors was related to prior knowledge, the slide time fixation, the slide number fixations, and the slide return fixations. The condition without connectors was related to the return fixations, the time fixation, and the number of fixations. Prior knowledge was correlated with the total time fixation, the total return fixations, and comprehension. This suggests that during reading without connectors more cognitive effort is required, observed in the return fixations; moreover, prior knowledge has an important role in the visual strategies required to process and obtain a representation of text. But participant performance was still good as observed in the scores of the reading comprehension task.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
议论文阅读:连接词存在与否对阅读理解和认知努力的影响
最近的研究证明,阅读和眼球运动之间有很强的联系。很少有调查报告连接词和先前知识在西班牙语阅读中的作用,以及它们与眼球运动的关系。本研究旨在评估两篇议论文中连接词的存在对认知努力和阅读理解的影响。41名心理学本科生参与了一项阅读理解任务,同时记录他们的眼动。连接器的情况与先验知识、载玻片时间固定、载玻片编号固定和载玻片返回固定有关。无连接器的情况与复位固定、时间固定和固定次数有关。先验知识与总时间注视、总回报注视和理解相关。这表明,在没有连接词的阅读过程中,需要更多的认知努力,在返回注视中观察到;此外,先验知识在处理和获得文本表示所需的视觉策略中发挥着重要作用。但从阅读理解任务的得分来看,参与者的表现仍然很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Costarricense de Psicologia
Revista Costarricense de Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teacher Self-regulation: Validation of Scales in Chile Applied with an Online Technological Tool Validación de la escala Techo de Cristal en trabajadoras durante la pandemia Autoeficacia académica, desempeño y acceso a la educación superior en contexto de pandemia Intervenciones parentales para el desarrollo lingüístico-comunicativo en preescolares con Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo: una revisión sistemática Percepción de los profesionales interventores de organismos colaboradores del Servicio Mejor Niñez sobre la vulneración de los derechos de niños, niñas y adolescentes en comuna centro-sur de Chile: una mirada desde el contexto de pandemia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1