The role of intuiting practices in navigating strategic opportunities

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Long Range Planning Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102323
Christian Walsh , Paul Knott , Jamie Collins
{"title":"The role of intuiting practices in navigating strategic opportunities","authors":"Christian Walsh ,&nbsp;Paul Knott ,&nbsp;Jamie Collins","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study addresses the question of how strategists use intuiting practices in the process of sensing, navigating and creating strategic opportunities. Existing literature highlights the significant role and nature of intuition in strategy from a theoretical cognitive perspective, but does not examine intuition empirically as a practice utilised by strategists. We undertook a two-year longitudinal study of seven strategists in high-technology firms as they attempted to progress new strategic opportunities. Using abductive analysis of the resulting data, we found that when navigating novel opportunities the practitioners’ intuiting practices were predominantly based on unfolding creative and social types of intuition, as opposed to a rapid expertise-based intuition, previously thought to be the dominant type. We extend existing typologies to propose a dynamic cyclic model of unfolding intuiting practice in the opportunity navigation process. This model draws on dual process theory and includes phases of intimation, investigation, validation and incubation. We found that strategists cycle through these different phases in order to navigate novel spaces, leading to continuation or abandonment of the opportunity development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":"56 3","pages":"Article 102323"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Long Range Planning","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630123000304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study addresses the question of how strategists use intuiting practices in the process of sensing, navigating and creating strategic opportunities. Existing literature highlights the significant role and nature of intuition in strategy from a theoretical cognitive perspective, but does not examine intuition empirically as a practice utilised by strategists. We undertook a two-year longitudinal study of seven strategists in high-technology firms as they attempted to progress new strategic opportunities. Using abductive analysis of the resulting data, we found that when navigating novel opportunities the practitioners’ intuiting practices were predominantly based on unfolding creative and social types of intuition, as opposed to a rapid expertise-based intuition, previously thought to be the dominant type. We extend existing typologies to propose a dynamic cyclic model of unfolding intuiting practice in the opportunity navigation process. This model draws on dual process theory and includes phases of intimation, investigation, validation and incubation. We found that strategists cycle through these different phases in order to navigate novel spaces, leading to continuation or abandonment of the opportunity development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直觉实践在把握战略机遇中的作用
本研究解决了战略家如何在感知、导航和创造战略机会的过程中使用直觉实践的问题。现有文献从理论认知的角度强调了直觉在战略中的重要作用和本质,但没有将直觉作为战略家使用的实践进行实证研究。我们对7位高科技公司的战略家进行了一项为期两年的纵向研究,研究他们如何寻求新的战略机会。通过对结果数据的溯因分析,我们发现,在把握新机会时,实践者的直觉实践主要基于展开的创造性和社会性直觉,而不是之前被认为是主导类型的基于专业知识的快速直觉。我们扩展了现有的类型学,提出了在机会导航过程中展开直觉实践的动态循环模型。该模型借鉴了双过程理论,包括暗示、调查、验证和孵化阶段。我们发现,战略家在这些不同的阶段中循环,以导航新的空间,从而导致机会开发的延续或放弃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Long Range Planning (LRP) is an internationally renowned journal specializing in the field of strategic management. Since its establishment in 1968, the journal has consistently published original research, garnering a strong reputation among academics. LRP actively encourages the submission of articles that involve empirical research and theoretical perspectives, including studies that provide critical assessments and analysis of the current state of knowledge in crucial strategic areas. The primary user base of LRP primarily comprises individuals from academic backgrounds, with the journal playing a dual role within this community. Firstly, it serves as a platform for the dissemination of research findings among academic researchers. Secondly, it serves as a channel for the transmission of ideas that can be effectively utilized in educational settings. The articles published in LRP cater to a diverse audience, including practicing managers and students in professional programs. While some articles may focus on practical applications, others may primarily target academic researchers. LRP adopts an inclusive approach to empirical research, accepting studies that draw on various methodologies such as primary survey data, archival data, case studies, and recognized approaches to data collection.
期刊最新文献
Outside vs. inside succession: Environmental and organizational contexts, strategic decision, and firm performance Inward internationalization and cross border acquisitions by emerging economy multinational enterprises: The moderating role of family and institutional ownership Meaning is in the eye of the beholder: Reconciling business model design with customer meaning-making Too much of a good thing: Addressing the shape of relationship between positive media sentiment and IPO performance Opening up emotionally: How top managers use peripheral actors' emotional expressions during inclusive strategy formulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1