The Engineering Project Organization Society and megaprojects: literature analysis using keywords

A. Cerić, J. Sertić
{"title":"The Engineering Project Organization Society and megaprojects: literature analysis using keywords","authors":"A. Cerić, J. Sertić","doi":"10.2478/otmcj-2018-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyze how the Engineering Project Organization Society (EPOS) has addressed the issue of megaprojects at their annual conferences organized from 2006 to 2016. The literature analysis used in this paper is a form of content analysis. It focuses on the usage of a particular term in scientific papers. In this case, the key term is “megaprojects” or “mega-projects”. Papers in which this term appears are selected for further analysis. The findings show that the main keyword “megaproject” or “mega-project” appears 22 times in the identified papers. It appears in 10 titles and nine abstracts. Most important for this literature analysis, it appears in seven lists of keywords. Literature analysis proceeded by analyzing the associated keywords in the seven papers in which the main keyword “megaproject” or “mega-projects” can be found in the listed keywords. The analysis shows that the main associated keywords are “governance”, “complexity”, and “trust”. This research provides a view of the collective understanding of megaprojects within the EPOS community and helps to shape further research in this field. In addition, the results of this research can be seen as a step forward for scholars and practitioners to discuss and develop a new theoretical framework for better understanding of megaproject governance.","PeriodicalId":42309,"journal":{"name":"Organization Technology and Management in Construction","volume":"11 1","pages":"1968 - 1974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Technology and Management in Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyze how the Engineering Project Organization Society (EPOS) has addressed the issue of megaprojects at their annual conferences organized from 2006 to 2016. The literature analysis used in this paper is a form of content analysis. It focuses on the usage of a particular term in scientific papers. In this case, the key term is “megaprojects” or “mega-projects”. Papers in which this term appears are selected for further analysis. The findings show that the main keyword “megaproject” or “mega-project” appears 22 times in the identified papers. It appears in 10 titles and nine abstracts. Most important for this literature analysis, it appears in seven lists of keywords. Literature analysis proceeded by analyzing the associated keywords in the seven papers in which the main keyword “megaproject” or “mega-projects” can be found in the listed keywords. The analysis shows that the main associated keywords are “governance”, “complexity”, and “trust”. This research provides a view of the collective understanding of megaprojects within the EPOS community and helps to shape further research in this field. In addition, the results of this research can be seen as a step forward for scholars and practitioners to discuss and develop a new theoretical framework for better understanding of megaproject governance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程项目组织学会与大型项目:使用关键词的文献分析
摘要本文的目的是分析工程项目组织协会(EPOS)如何在2006年至2016年组织的年度会议上解决大型项目问题。本文所使用的文献分析是内容分析的一种形式。它关注的是科学论文中某一特定术语的用法。在这种情况下,关键术语是“大型项目”或“巨型项目”。选择出现该术语的论文进行进一步分析。研究结果显示,主要关键词“megaproject”或“megaprogram”在已识别的论文中出现了22次。它出现在10个标题和9个摘要中。对于这篇文献分析来说,最重要的是,它出现在七个关键词列表中。文献分析通过分析七篇论文中的相关关键词来进行,其中主要关键词“megaproject”或“mega-projects”可以在列出的关键词中找到。分析表明,主要相关关键词是“治理”、“复杂性”和“信任”。这项研究提供了一种对EPOS社区内大型项目的集体理解的观点,并有助于形成该领域的进一步研究。此外,这项研究的结果可以被视为学者和从业者讨论和开发一个新的理论框架以更好地理解大型项目治理的又一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: project practitioners’ perspectives Exploring the social legitimacy of urban road PPPs in Nigeria Capability improvement measures of the public sector for implementation of building information modeling in construction projects Linking life cycle BIM data to a facility management system using Revit Dynamo Investigation of the poor-quality practices on building construction sites in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1