Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: project practitioners’ perspectives

Virender Kumar, Amrendra Pandey, Rahul Singh
{"title":"Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: project practitioners’ perspectives","authors":"Virender Kumar, Amrendra Pandey, Rahul Singh","doi":"10.2478/otmcj-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Project management is primarily practitioner-oriented and loaded with many critical success factors (CSFs), and although these are well-evidenced in theory, they do not deliver as efficiently as factors of interest to project professionals during execution. The present study explores the perceptions of senior project managers (PMs) about project success, CSFs and complexity in large construction projects. Data from project practitioners were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using content analysis. The participants were selected with convenience sampling method given the complex understanding of the domain and included highly experienced PMs from the global community with expertise in project management. PMs perceive a small number of CSFs in contrast to the large exhaustive CSFs listed in the questionnaire surveys. Though important, traditional constraints of the Iron Triangle are considered inadequate in defining project success. Project professionals are seen as relying more on other performance indicators for defining a project as a success. They perceive complex construction projects in terms of a large number of interfaces, complex working systems and uncertainty. The findings of this paper suggest that project practitioners perceive differently about the CSFs and project success.","PeriodicalId":42309,"journal":{"name":"Organization Technology and Management in Construction","volume":"15 1","pages":"1 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Technology and Management in Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Project management is primarily practitioner-oriented and loaded with many critical success factors (CSFs), and although these are well-evidenced in theory, they do not deliver as efficiently as factors of interest to project professionals during execution. The present study explores the perceptions of senior project managers (PMs) about project success, CSFs and complexity in large construction projects. Data from project practitioners were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using content analysis. The participants were selected with convenience sampling method given the complex understanding of the domain and included highly experienced PMs from the global community with expertise in project management. PMs perceive a small number of CSFs in contrast to the large exhaustive CSFs listed in the questionnaire surveys. Though important, traditional constraints of the Iron Triangle are considered inadequate in defining project success. Project professionals are seen as relying more on other performance indicators for defining a project as a success. They perceive complex construction projects in terms of a large number of interfaces, complex working systems and uncertainty. The findings of this paper suggest that project practitioners perceive differently about the CSFs and project success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
项目成功和建筑项目的关键成功因素:项目从业者的观点
摘要项目管理主要以从业者为导向,并包含许多关键的成功因素(CSF),尽管这些因素在理论上得到了很好的证明,但在执行过程中,它们并不像项目专业人员感兴趣的因素那样有效。本研究探讨了高级项目经理(PM)对大型建筑项目中项目成功、CSF和复杂性的看法。通过半结构化访谈收集项目从业者的数据,并使用内容分析进行分析。鉴于对该领域的复杂理解,参与者采用方便的抽样方法进行选择,其中包括来自全球社区的具有项目管理专业知识的经验丰富的PM。与问卷调查中列出的大量详尽的CSF相比,PM认为CSF数量较少。尽管很重要,但铁三角的传统约束被认为不足以定义项目的成功。项目专业人员被视为更多地依赖其他绩效指标来定义项目的成功。他们从大量的接口、复杂的工作系统和不确定性的角度来看待复杂的建设项目。本文的研究结果表明,项目从业者对CSF和项目成功的看法不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: project practitioners’ perspectives Exploring the social legitimacy of urban road PPPs in Nigeria Capability improvement measures of the public sector for implementation of building information modeling in construction projects Linking life cycle BIM data to a facility management system using Revit Dynamo Investigation of the poor-quality practices on building construction sites in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1