COVID-19 Health Communication Networks on Twitter: Identifying Sources, Disseminators, and Brokers

Ian Kim, T. Valente
{"title":"COVID-19 Health Communication Networks on Twitter: Identifying Sources, Disseminators, and Brokers","authors":"Ian Kim, T. Valente","doi":"10.21307/connections-2019.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19)’s devastating effects on the physical and mental health of the public are unlike previous medical crises, in part because of people’s collective access to communication technologies. Unfortunately, a clear understanding of the diffusion of health information on social media is lacking, which has a potentially negative impact on the effectiveness of emergency communication. This study applied social network analysis approaches to examine patterns of #COVID19 information flow on Twitter. A total of 1,404,496 publicly available tweets from 946,940 U.S. users were retrieved and analyzed. Particular attention was paid to the structures of retweet and mention networks and identification of influential users: information sources, disseminators, and brokers. Overall, COVID-19 information was not transmitted efficiently. Findings pointed to the importance of fostering connections between clusters to promote the diffusion in both networks. Lots of localized clusters limited the spread of timely information, causing difficulty in establishing any momentum in shaping urgent public actions. Rather than health and communication professionals, there was dominant involvement of non-professional users responsible for major COVID-19 information generation and dissemination, suggesting a lack of credibility and accuracy in the information. Inadequate influence of health officials and government agencies in brokering information contributed to concerns about the spread of dis/misinformation to the public. Significant differences in the type of influential users existed across roles and across networks. Conceptual and practical implications for emergency communication strategies are discussed.","PeriodicalId":88856,"journal":{"name":"Connections (Toronto, Ont.)","volume":"40 1","pages":"129 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connections (Toronto, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2019.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19)’s devastating effects on the physical and mental health of the public are unlike previous medical crises, in part because of people’s collective access to communication technologies. Unfortunately, a clear understanding of the diffusion of health information on social media is lacking, which has a potentially negative impact on the effectiveness of emergency communication. This study applied social network analysis approaches to examine patterns of #COVID19 information flow on Twitter. A total of 1,404,496 publicly available tweets from 946,940 U.S. users were retrieved and analyzed. Particular attention was paid to the structures of retweet and mention networks and identification of influential users: information sources, disseminators, and brokers. Overall, COVID-19 information was not transmitted efficiently. Findings pointed to the importance of fostering connections between clusters to promote the diffusion in both networks. Lots of localized clusters limited the spread of timely information, causing difficulty in establishing any momentum in shaping urgent public actions. Rather than health and communication professionals, there was dominant involvement of non-professional users responsible for major COVID-19 information generation and dissemination, suggesting a lack of credibility and accuracy in the information. Inadequate influence of health officials and government agencies in brokering information contributed to concerns about the spread of dis/misinformation to the public. Significant differences in the type of influential users existed across roles and across networks. Conceptual and practical implications for emergency communication strategies are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推特上的新冠肺炎健康传播网络:识别来源、传播者和经纪人
摘要2019年冠状病毒疾病(新冠肺炎)对公众身心健康的破坏性影响不同于以往的医疗危机,部分原因是人们集体获得了通信技术。不幸的是,人们对社交媒体上健康信息的传播缺乏明确的了解,这可能会对紧急沟通的有效性产生负面影响。这项研究应用社交网络分析方法来研究推特上#COVID19信息流的模式。共检索并分析了946940名美国用户的1404496条公开推文。特别关注转发和提及网络的结构以及有影响力的用户的识别:信息来源、传播者和经纪人。总体而言,新冠肺炎信息没有得到有效传播。研究结果指出,促进集群之间的联系对于促进两个网络中的传播具有重要意义。许多本地化的集群限制了及时信息的传播,导致难以在形成紧急公共行动方面建立任何势头。负责新冠肺炎主要信息生成和传播的非专业用户主要参与,而不是卫生和通信专业人员,这表明信息缺乏可信度和准确性。卫生官员和政府机构在信息中介方面的影响力不足,加剧了人们对向公众传播虚假信息的担忧。不同角色和不同网络的影响力用户类型存在显著差异。讨论了应急沟通策略的概念和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Satisfaction with Retirement: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis with Social Network Analysis On the Effect of Reciprocal Dyadic Relations on the Share of Lexical Practices Men Think they Know More about Networks ScriptNet: An integrated criminological-network analysis tool Isolation, cohesion and contingent network effects: the case of school attachment and engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1