Men Think they Know More about Networks

Z. Neal
{"title":"Men Think they Know More about Networks","authors":"Z. Neal","doi":"10.2478/connections-2022-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The fields of social network analysis and network science have recently undertaken efforts to address issues of gender diversity and representation. However, despite these important efforts, subtle threats to representation are likely to persist. I use a 2023 global survey of 260 network researchers to show that men rate themselves as having more expertise with networks than women. This is troubling because, to the extent that women believe they lack the expertise to be considered for awards or collaboration opportunities, it can impede other efforts to diversify the field. I conclude by discussing some possible explanations for this finding and some possible strategies for addressing its consequences.","PeriodicalId":88856,"journal":{"name":"Connections (Toronto, Ont.)","volume":"43 1","pages":"50 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connections (Toronto, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/connections-2022-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The fields of social network analysis and network science have recently undertaken efforts to address issues of gender diversity and representation. However, despite these important efforts, subtle threats to representation are likely to persist. I use a 2023 global survey of 260 network researchers to show that men rate themselves as having more expertise with networks than women. This is troubling because, to the extent that women believe they lack the expertise to be considered for awards or collaboration opportunities, it can impede other efforts to diversify the field. I conclude by discussing some possible explanations for this finding and some possible strategies for addressing its consequences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男性认为他们更了解社交网络
摘要社会网络分析和网络科学领域最近努力解决性别多样性和代表性问题。然而,尽管做出了这些重要努力,但对代表权的微妙威胁可能依然存在。我在2023年对260名网络研究人员进行了一项全球调查,结果显示,男性认为自己在网络方面比女性更有专业知识。这令人不安,因为如果女性认为自己缺乏获得奖项或合作机会所需的专业知识,这可能会阻碍该领域多样化的其他努力。最后,我讨论了对这一发现的一些可能解释以及解决其后果的一些可能策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Satisfaction with Retirement: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis with Social Network Analysis On the Effect of Reciprocal Dyadic Relations on the Share of Lexical Practices Men Think they Know More about Networks ScriptNet: An integrated criminological-network analysis tool Isolation, cohesion and contingent network effects: the case of school attachment and engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1